CoC: Color of Clowns

Go Boo Me... I've Seen What Makes you Cheer


I'm awarding myself the Furry Peace Prize, for my contributions to interspecies relationships, since I'm the sole resident inside Zunesha (the zoning laws are complicated. Basically, I gerrymandered Zunesha's innards to make myself the only official resident, then elected myself as King)

Thank you, thank you very much.

As Johnny Bravo would say, do the monkey with me.



I'd like to thank Interspecies Reviewers, the Lion King, the Pokemon Franchise, the Conejo Club, Eiichiro Oda...

Join us for the "Backstabber Peace Prize" later this week, you'll never guess who's going to win
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/sports/comments/1pfc5x2 Oh, this will do numbers with the meat and potatoes crowd…watch this be the thing that finally makes the base turn on him :risitameh:
Actually soccer is a more accurate name than “football”.

“Football” is a generic term used to describe various different sports where people kick balls. American Football and Soccer are the most famous of these. But there are other variations of this game.

Soccer refers to association football, which is what most of the world refers to as “football”.
 
Actually soccer is a more accurate name than “football”.

“Football” is a generic term used to describe various different sports where people kick balls. American Football and Soccer are the most famous of these. But there are other variations of this game.

Soccer refers to association football, which is what most of the world refers to as “football”.
:seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously::seriously:
 
I barely post in here nowadays. I spent months away too. We are not the same.
That's not why I said that
Actually soccer is a more accurate name than “football”.

“Football” is a generic term used to describe various different sports where people kick balls. American Football and Soccer are the most famous of these. But there are other variations of this game.

Soccer refers to association football, which is what most of the world refers to as “football”.
It's not that hard to just name soccer football and name the American football something else
I myself am American from birth yet I know how dumb this is
 
Actually soccer is a more accurate name than “football”.

“Football” is a generic term used to describe various different sports where people kick balls. American Football and Soccer are the most famous of these. But there are other variations of this game.

Soccer refers to association football, which is what most of the world refers to as “football”.
armored Rugby ain't Football

now cry
 
You are forever dooming yourself to lose the audience. You are basically admitting that you will ignore what they said and meant, all in order to push a context that you assume.
The only audience that I will lose is the one that don't think beyond. Only Zenos think that I didn't look at the words. I did. This person equated letting themselves be influenced in their beliefs by OP with a overally parasocial activity. Which is 1. Dumb. 2. Negates the fact that their beliefs are necessarily influenced by it, even subtly. As such, Zenos actually didn't looked at the words, and you are projecting.
 
Continental Europe once held 25% of global GDP. Today it clings to 14%, nearly half its global weight erased in a single generation. Not by invasion. Not by Putin. By decisions its own elites made freely. Europe was no prisoner. It was not dragged into this. It chose ideology over energy security, fantasy over industry, obdience over sovereignty. It had the power to act like a civilization, and acted instead like a petulant, arrogant vassal.

They swore Russia would disappear.
Yet she stands rooted, sovereign, expanding, the Eurasian pole they insisted could never exist. Its economy rises into the world’s top four while Europe implodes. Its industrial base grows while Europe’s corrodes.

And it is Europe that dims: censored, exhausted, directionless, governed by elites who call obedience maturity and dependency enlightenment. A continent once central to world history now drifts unrecognizable even by the ally that encouraged its self-destruction and now drafts the alibi from afar.

The EU tried to erase Russia. In reality, Europe erased itself. And Washington just wrote the obituary.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
The only audience that I will lose is the one that don't think beyond. Only Zenos think that I didn't look at the words. I did. This person equated letting themselves be influenced in their beliefs by OP with a overally parasocial activity. Which is 1. Dumb. 2. Negates the fact that their beliefs are necessarily influenced by it, even subtly. As such, Zenos actually didn't looked at the words, and you are projecting.
Galaxy clearly said that your beliefs can impact how you consume things, and that what you consume can affect your politics. "OnePiss" however is so childish that you must be braindead to let such a low tier cmoic affect you in such a way imo.

He didn't say nor imply that outside influence cant be a factor. He literally said the opposite.
 
Galaxy clearly said that your beliefs can impact how you consume things, and that what you consume can affect your politics. "OnePiss" however is so childish that you must be braindead to let such a low tier cmoic affect you in such a way imo.
Considering that because a story is childlish therefore can't influence the mind, implies that if a person think negatively of a story ("childlish") therefore said person will not be influenced by it. This implicates a countertruth not just for One Piece, but multiple types of stories and rethorics or discourses. Hence, the generalization is needed. I'm always very careful with words, I just go beyond.

And since no one but me wants to make an effort and reflect here, I will stop my three lines limit:

This affirmation in itself implies that there are things that will influence your belief and things that won't. But, this is again a missconception as everything influences our belief. The influences can sometimes be subtly positive or negative, meaning affirming a position or countering it. But a story that does not influence in some way a person does not exist. Just like a rethoric.

The question is does this influence create a reactance ? Nah.. It will most likely be very minimal, but a thousand of stories like that and you will see the result.

All this belief relies on the idealist idea that we can avoid the influence of your environment. Which is a false belief.

We can't escape the influence of the environment or a story.


Which is why I said:


You really think you are not influenced by the outside world and you can think "all by yourself" like a big boy/girl?

:usosmug:
You see, the problem is not that people can't understand me. The problem is that I jump ahead across so many steps that I consider not relevant to mention - thinking that people will get the logic - that I forgot that people don't think like me and can't follow me. And frankly, this is something that I have had to deal with all my life. Making me pass for a fool, when I was actually explaining them something that they did not even understand themselves.

So you are right in the sense that I risk losing my audience. But it's not because I will ignore what they say, it's because I will consider it and take it too far, to a place that they can't yet reach.

A bit like the logic behind my reasoning about this forum. I jumped too many steps too fast and too loudly and lost you all forever. But this is what it is. This is now sadly something that you will have to learn when it's too late.
 
I wish there was a way to change the way I think. Sadly, it's not possible, this is not a belief problem, but a biological one. I'm sad that this prevented me from making people here understand the real danger of toxicity and fascism or the benefit of politics, but I believe in time. I planted a seed, an inception.. maybe some people will now make a much better job at it than me.

I can only hope.
 
Last edited:

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Considering that because a story is childlish therefore can't influence the mind, implies that if a person think negatively of a story ("childlish") therefore said person will not be influenced by it. This implicates a countertruth not just for One Piece, but multiple types of stories and rethorics or discourses. Hence, the generalization is needed. I'm always very careful with words, I just go beyond.

And since no one but me wants to make an effort and reflect here, I will stop my three lines limit:

This affirmation in itself implies that there are things that will influence your belief and things that won't. But, this is again a missconception as everything influences our belief. The influences can sometimes be subtly positive or negative, meaning affirming a position or countering it. But a story that does not influence in some way a person does not exist. Just like a rethoric.

The question is does this influence create a reactance ? Nah.. It will most likely be very minimal, but a thousand of stories like that and you will see the result.

All this belief relies on the idealist idea that we can avoid the influence of your environment. Which is a false belief.

We can't escape the influence of the environment or a story.

Which is why I said:




You see, the problem is not that people can't understand me. The problem is that I jump ahead across so many steps that I consider not relevant to mention - thinking that people will get the logic - that I forgot that people don't think like me and can't follow me. And frankly, this is something that I have had to deal with all my life. Making me pass for a fool, when I was actually explaining them something that they did not even understand themselves.

So you are right in the sense that I risk losing my audience. But it's not because I will ignore what they say, it's because I will consider it and take it too far, to a place that they can't yet reach.

A bit like the logic behind my reasoning about this forum. I jumped too many steps too fast and too loudly and lost you all forever. But this is what it is. This is now sadly something that you will have to learn when it's too late.
So you acknowledge that your issue is jumping the gun and making assumptions, but act disappointed when someone doesn't like being strawmanned? There's nothing for that person to learn when you claim things that they never said, using pseudo-philosophical gymnastics that is irrelevant to their point.

If someone says men on average have more physical strength than woman, you will swoop in and claim they are enabling the patriarchy by pushing men>women rhetoric, making them sexist. It doesnt take a genius to know why you fail.
 
Top