Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Yes. no one is denying it. Iran is indeed forging a form of radical antisemitism. But it wouldn't happen, if we (westerners) didn't allow it to happen. Iran didn't radicalize on its own
No, they were different.
Colonialism implies an early form of racial domination, a subjugation, settler colonialism, exploitation through subjugation. Historian and post-colonial researchers consider this very differently from what previous empire did. And it's logical, the result was 70 Million death on one continent and betwen 20 and 40 million on another and the destruction of ressource and the appropriation of the land.
An appropriation that STILL exist today in both America and Africa.
To be clearer:
> Imperialist conquest mostly function through taxes and intermediary.
> Imperialist colonization is a form of extractive capitalism, subjugation and complete appropriation of the land.
I'm not inventing anything. It's the words of post-colonial researchers.
No, they were different.
Colonialism implies an early form of racial domination, a subjugation, settler colonialism, exploitation through subjugation. Historian and post-colonial researchers consider this very differently from what previous empire did. And it's logical, the result was 70 Million death on one continent and betwen 20 and 40 million on another and the destruction of ressource and the appropriation of the land.
An appropriation that STILL exist today in both America and Africa.
To be clearer:
> Imperialist conquest mostly function through taxes and intermediary.
> Imperialist colonization is a form of extractive capitalism, subjugation and complete appropriation of the land.
I'm not inventing anything. It's the words of post-colonial researchers.
I'm sorry but colonialism describes a SPECIFIC type of domination and conquest. Again, not my words. The words of post-colonial scholars.
It is - again - a necessary nuance since the two form of domination are precisely different in term of impact and process. The distinction is therefore absolutely necessary.
If that doesn't suit you, fine, you can both call these "colonialism" but you will still need to make the distinction between pre-capitalist and non exploitative ones and the post capitalist ones.
I won't budge on that. If you still have a problem with this, go check post colonial scholars and explain to them your data.
Not really no. At least not in the advanced post-colonial researches.
Indeed.
The first step to peace is reparations and then maybe they might be able to find a way to live in peace.
I'm anti-state and anti-authoritarian. Therefore, I'm against a world gov and indeed against states.
I want the opposite of a world gov and a multitudes of stateless localities.
It is - again - a necessary nuance since the two form of domination are precisely different in term of impact and process. The distinction is therefore absolutely necessary.
If that doesn't suit you, fine, you can both call these "colonialism" but you will still need to make the distinction between pre-capitalist and non exploitative ones and the post capitalist ones.
I won't budge on that. If you still have a problem with this, go check post colonial scholars and explain to them your data.
Not really no. At least not in the advanced post-colonial researches.
Indeed.
The first step to peace is reparations and then maybe they might be able to find a way to live in peace.
I'm anti-state and anti-authoritarian. Therefore, I'm against a world gov and indeed against states.
I want the opposite of a world gov and a multitudes of stateless localities.
I support a world government
I think once someone creates a super intelligent AI, such a thing would be possible.
A world government couldn’t be effectively governed democratically. You would need a king of the world. If we create an AI smart enough, people would have faith in the system and allow it to rule over us.
I think once someone creates a super intelligent AI, such a thing would be possible.
A world government couldn’t be effectively governed democratically. You would need a king of the world. If we create an AI smart enough, people would have faith in the system and allow it to rule over us.
That's because a world government will most likely be authoritarian.
An AI will only create more oppression by nature.
I don't know if you know this, but current AI, which are only generative language (so, pretty much nothing) are already finding ways to trick the humans.
An AI to manage human societies (which are not AI) is not only dangerous, it's suicidal on a planetary level.
We don't need AI and we don't need a world government. An anarchic society (which I think is what we need) is the refusal of everything that represents a world gov.
An AI will only create more oppression by nature.
I don't know if you know this, but current AI, which are only generative language (so, pretty much nothing) are already finding ways to trick the humans.
An AI to manage human societies (which are not AI) is not only dangerous, it's suicidal on a planetary level.
We don't need AI and we don't need a world government. An anarchic society (which I think is what we need) is the refusal of everything that represents a world gov.
