Powers & Abilities Can you spot the difference b/w Shanks wizard mastery vs Zoro's swordsmanship
- Thread starter Boiroy
- Start date
You never see someone losing limbs after an explosion? Lmao Why Xebec's leg wasn't cut in his real body, just like there was no holes in his body.
If you aren't a retard, first you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting something lmao.
You lying clown still talking about Roger? This is Shanks not Roger you are desperate af lmao, when it's all revealed you gonna run just like it happened ZKK anyway why you struggle and cry?
We are talking about Shanks, not Roger. So you got debunked.
If you aren't a retard, first you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting something lmao.
You lying clown still talking about Roger? This is Shanks not Roger you are desperate af lmao, when it's all revealed you gonna run just like it happened ZKK anyway why you struggle and cry?
We are talking about Shanks, not Roger. So you got debunked.
You never see someone losing limbs after an explosion? Lmao Why Xebec's leg wasn't cut in his real body, just like there was no holes in his body.
You lying clown still talking about Roger? This is Shanks not Roger you are desperate af lmao, when it's all revealed you gonna run just like it happened ZKK anyway why you struggle and cry?
We are talking about Shanks, not Roger. So you got debunked.
You lying clown still talking about Roger? This is Shanks not Roger you are desperate af lmao, when it's all revealed you gonna run just like it happened ZKK anyway why you struggle and cry?
We are talking about Shanks, not Roger. So you got debunked.
Where are his wings and claws and teeth lmfao
No debunk.
THE IMPACT ALONE destroys you garps is a circle rogers is a slice.
Sure show me proof that kamusari is shanks strongest attack. Ill wait.
Your lying ass was saying named attack > no name attack.
So why you lie again?
First you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting anything. If it was Kamusari, Xebec would be split in two, doesn't mean it usually cuts, it doesn't.
Xebec's real body had no slashes, just broken bones.
Shanks's non cutting Kamusari > Shanks's cutting attacks.
So why you lie again?
First you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting anything. If it was Kamusari, Xebec would be split in two, doesn't mean it usually cuts, it doesn't.
Xebec's real body had no slashes, just broken bones.
Shanks's non cutting Kamusari > Shanks's cutting attacks.
Your lying ass was saying named attack > no name attack.
So why you lie again?
First you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting anything. If it was Kamusari, Xebec would be split in two, doesn't mean it usually cuts, it doesn't.
Shanks's non cutting Kamusari > Shanks's cutting attacks.
So why you lie again?
First you need to explain how Garp's punches pierce, then you can run your ZKK mouth about Roger cutting anything. If it was Kamusari, Xebec would be split in two, doesn't mean it usually cuts, it doesn't.
Shanks's non cutting Kamusari > Shanks's cutting attacks.
I said show me where it was said shanks strongest attack is kamusari YOU SAID IT WAS prove it.
Garps punches pierce HOLES with his haki
Roger has done MULTIPLE SLICES
sure no one arguing otherwise bar the voices in your head.
Why you tagged my name here you dumb clown? You thought you proved something? Now you asking me ''who said''
It's your bitch ass called me here and you didn't prove shit.
Infact, I debunked your ass again by using your own dumb named attack argument.
Shanks's Kamusari > no name cutting.
Stop being a ZKKclown, we all know you gonna run again after Shanks > Mihawk is revealed.
It's your bitch ass called me here and you didn't prove shit.
Infact, I debunked your ass again by using your own dumb named attack argument.
Shanks's Kamusari > no name cutting.
Stop being a ZKKclown, we all know you gonna run again after Shanks > Mihawk is revealed.
Why you tagged my name here you dumb clown? You thought you proved something? Now you asking me ''who said''
It's your bitch ass called me here and you didn't prove shit.
Infact, I debunked your dumb ass again by using your own dumb named attack argument.
Shanks's Kamusari > no name cutting.
Stop being a ZKKclown, we all know you gonna run again after Shanks > Mihawk is revealed.
It's your bitch ass called me here and you didn't prove shit.
Infact, I debunked your dumb ass again by using your own dumb named attack argument.
Shanks's Kamusari > no name cutting.
Stop being a ZKKclown, we all know you gonna run again after Shanks > Mihawk is revealed.
PROVE IT.
Haki isn't = swordsmanship, but saying opposite of that only proves how dumb you are.
I debunked your ass showing ''named'' attack from Zolo vs Monet which had no Haki
We all know you are an absolute liar, you will lie until Shanks > Mihawk revealed, then you gonna run away just like it happened with ZKK.
I debunked your ass showing ''named'' attack from Zolo vs Monet which had no Haki
We all know you are an absolute liar, you will lie until Shanks > Mihawk revealed, then you gonna run away just like it happened with ZKK.
Haki isn't = swordsmanship, but saying opposite of that only proves how dumb you are.
I debunked your ass showing ''named'' attack from Zolo vs Monet which had no Haki
We all know you are an absolute liar, you will lie until Shanks > Mihawk revealed, then you gonna run away just like it happened with ZKK.
I debunked your ass showing ''named'' attack from Zolo vs Monet which had no Haki
We all know you are an absolute liar, you will lie until Shanks > Mihawk revealed, then you gonna run away just like it happened with ZKK.
Zoros attack on monet is swordsmanship
Rocks acoc attacks are swordsmanship
This isnt either or
YOU MAKE SWORDSMANSHIP STRONGER WITH STRONGER HAKI