Character Discussion Did Roger simping for Shakky make him lose all his aura?

#43
It makes them human, rather than a monolithic epicness piece of nothing (Aura master shit emperor Sung Jin-woo style of character), every single character in One piece is pathetic in an etymological point of view, because not having ups and downs would make them feel devoid of feelings, not even Imu is free from that, because even Imu isn't free from having loved someone. During history there has been a huge amount of people who didn't actually were fully like they went in history like, others put those attributes on them, their closer ones wouldn't mystify them as much if you ask.
dont give me that ,

There are more ways to make a character feel human than making them look like disgusting freaks over women.
imu is actually fine, but putting comedic effects and turning characters into absolute love slaves is bad.



It's not the simping that's the issue for me. It's the presentation of it.

I agree that Roger falling for Shakky is a good way to differentiate him from Luffy. The problem is that there's no way to look past this shit:

Flat on his ass with hearts in eyes, tf? This is just unsubtle and doesn't really fit the image or character of Roger that was seen so far imo esp. pre-Oden.

Which is my biggest issue with WB as well; him going heart eyes for Shakky is dumb, him acting like a massive tsundere about her fits way better to me.

(Hell it's the issue I have with even Sanji, I'd like his gag way more if it was toned down more and not ridiculous nosebleed bs)
Basically this ^
 
#60
Because he's Luffy.
I don't want Roger to be Luffy 2.0, but his own character, and a grown ass man at that, not a giggling retard acting like he's still 14.
He's also a man stuck on a ship with nothing but men most of the time. Even putting aside how as Sentinel mentioned above, it's just a trope they like in Japan that some people here took WAY too seriously.
 
Top