And our push on him didn’t have any ill intent or spite involved at all. We genuinely believed he was scum. It‘s not a bad tactic in lynchpin games to burn yourself to get one out and that’s how it felt like. Especially with how his push started which was him attributing scum behavior to normal newbie behavior. Shanks knew we were on his side, so what’s wrong with him sheeping me? He saw me voting scum the day prior, so in his mind I was a good Senpai to follow. Also my comment about scum siding didn’t take many assumptions to see that it was done to make us appear more harmless to scum so we don’t get killed. By all means everything we did was play to our wincon and protect a lynchpin who we knew the scum team needed gone.
[FNZ] Super Role Madness Naruto Shippuden: An Alternate Universe Mafia Game Thread [Game Ended - Mafia Win]
- Thread starter EkkoLoJinx
- Start date
i dont know if someone wud be willing to look at all this text lol. maybe i can hire rej next time if hes brave enough
SRMs probably wouldnt need a coach since they r more casual oriented
regardless of that, the disconnect i see is mostly you think powers role is bastard and would have been okay if the game advertised bastard mechanics, while i disagree that its bastard
ill invite you to explicitly explain what you think bastard mechanic is and hopefully one of us can convince the other from there, else we can agree to disagree
SRMs probably wouldnt need a coach since they r more casual oriented
regardless of that, the disconnect i see is mostly you think powers role is bastard and would have been okay if the game advertised bastard mechanics, while i disagree that its bastard
ill invite you to explicitly explain what you think bastard mechanic is and hopefully one of us can convince the other from there, else we can agree to disagree
Okay, let me give you an example.
You have a magical stone.
You are told that if the stone gets shattered an evil villain gets a world ending power up.
Nobody in their right mind would let the stone get shattered. Especially without having a clue who exactly the villain is.
Now in your game the stone is part of said villain . And the only way you would even find out is if you shatter the stone that you know gives the villain a power up.
Can you see the dilemma here?
You have a magical stone.
You are told that if the stone gets shattered an evil villain gets a world ending power up.
Nobody in their right mind would let the stone get shattered. Especially without having a clue who exactly the villain is.
Now in your game the stone is part of said villain . And the only way you would even find out is if you shatter the stone that you know gives the villain a power up.
Can you see the dilemma here?
i can start first to me a bastard role or mechanic is something that cannot be explained by an action a player did or by a role flipping somewhere
if anything that happens has an explaination, its not bastard imo. if the lie is purely from the host side and cannot be explained via thread or roles then its bastard
example of non barard: cop returning negative results is not bastard if a player used a framer shot like juice's
example of bastard: being told that jinchuriki are town aligned only to find out that one of them isnt. that wud be pretty bastard
example of gray area: hidden abilities that flip with the roles can be a gray area. they are bastardish when hidden but not after being revealed
if anything that happens has an explaination, its not bastard imo. if the lie is purely from the host side and cannot be explained via thread or roles then its bastard
example of non barard: cop returning negative results is not bastard if a player used a framer shot like juice's
example of bastard: being told that jinchuriki are town aligned only to find out that one of them isnt. that wud be pretty bastard
example of gray area: hidden abilities that flip with the roles can be a gray area. they are bastardish when hidden but not after being revealed
