Questions & Mysteries Will The Holy Knights live up to the hype or be disappointing in Elbaf?

What’s more likely to Happen ?

  • Gunko & Sommers will be Hype, Killingham will Disappoint

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Only Killingham will live up to the hype

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    56
Qilingham and Sommers are going to be extreme diff fights for Zoro and Sanji.

We know for a fact Sanji is going to struggle as he doesn’t have ACoC.

But Zoro probably isn’t going to coast either, granted that Qilingham basically commands an entire army of monsters. He will certainly be able to leverage that and land a cheap shot on Zoro.
 
As others have already said, the clouds - on mythicals - are not a proof of anything.
We had baby Yamato with clouds, just to say one.

Clouds can maybe be a proof of Awakening on normal and Ancient zoans, since to my knowledge no regular or Ancient zoan had them before Awakening, but that's it and even this Is problematic since some confirmed awakened normal zoans don't have those.
 
Last edited:
Isn't Garling representative of the moon?
Exactly.

And the Moon Is the closest planet to Earth/Imu in general and in the geocentric model too:



And how is Garling connected to Dragon's plot? Don't you think it makes more sense if the Warrior God of Justice fought the World's Worst Criminal?
Garling Is the reason behind GV, which was the reason why Dragon turned againt the WG in the first place.
He was also the "husband" of the woman Dragon found and tried to help and the father of the two children he tried to save in GV.

I think Dragon vs Topman made sense before, when Dragon didn't have any notable connection with any of the Gorosei and so him vs the most notable Gorosei made sense.
Now not only the most notable Gorosei is Garling (Moon and so on), but Dragon has a personal plot connection with that Gorosei.

Not to mention Garling Is a much more important character than Topman:

 
Last edited:
Exactly.

And the Moon Is the closest planet to Earth/Imu in general and in the geocentric model too:





Garling Is the reason behind GV, which was the reason why Dragon turned againt the WG in the first place.
He was also the "husban" of the woman Dragon found and tried to help and the father of the two children he tried to save in GV.

I think Dragon vs Topman made sense before, when Dragon didn't have any notable connection with any of the Gorosei and so him vs the most notable Gorosei made sense.
Now not only the most notable Gorosei is Garling (Moon and so on), but Dragon has a personal plot connection with that Gorosei.

Not to mention Garling Is a much more important character than Topman:

Fair points, but I'm still not entirely certain. It could also be Sabo who fights Garling for Dragon instead, sun vs moon type of thing. Never truly saw Sabo fighting Shamrock as it seems like Teach will probably kill Shamrock instead
 
Fair points, but I'm still not entirely certain. It could also be Sabo who fights Garling for Dragon instead, sun vs moon type of thing. Never truly saw Sabo fighting Shamrock as it seems like Teach will probably kill Shamrock instead
Could be.

I have Teach against the "real" Shanks though, killing him or defeating him at least. It was hyped a million times in the manga and even in the extra material so I don't think Oda is going to skip it.

If that is true, and if Dragon vs Garling is also true, then Sabo vs Shamrock makes even more sense because:

- the HK were hyped to be a fight for the revs, and Shamrock is HK's leader while Sabo is Rev's chief of staff;
- both are kind of the same figure: "brother of" and the "child"/protegé of the big figure and both have climbed the ranks to be the highest ranking person under them (in Shamrock's case, under the Gorosei rank as a whole);
- last, both are in that double spread (sure, Teach is too so him killing Shamrock would check this as well).

We'll see.
 
Last edited:
Top