It might be a stretch lol. But the Alexis constant tagging was what legitimately created the wagon in the first place and most of the voters on it I don’t think were very attached to the wagon & we were going with flow with no great direction at the time (which is why we CFD’d after it twice lol).
But the general thought there may well be complete junk logic and I am aware there’s some backwards working involved by a biased worldview (probably shouldn’t do that!) But also it’s not even actually a consideration I’m using to read your slot just a half baked thought during the moment. I know you told me not to respond but feels wrong not to lol.
Have you even tried to read my slot outside of it? The problem I'm saying is, it's not a natural flow of logic - you're investing an angle that he was killed for his reads when the evidence suggests that his reads were mostly wrong, and so instead of thinking "maybe he wasn't killed for his reads", your thought process is "well the only way he could have been killed for his reads is if (x) was scum", when no scum is going to kill someone with a hit rate of what, 1 in 10? That's the issue and that's what I'm pointing out to you. The conclusion itself is immaterial.
As an aside, part of the reason I've been pretty comfortable with town reading both you and Flower was because you're both far too, and I can't really word this in a way that won't be potentially bothersome - I think both of you are far too tryhard and value winning over the quality of the game, which is why I can't see either of you on a scum team that kills him. In fact, and I've sat on this for a bit because it doesn't really fit my current worldview, the only one I can see advocate it before I came into the game is Cal. Or... Hayu-