I never said Yamato dealt any serious, lasting damage. It’s be wild if she could do that with a fruitless attack. I’m just contesting the rest of the Admiral fandom’s claims that the attack did 0 damage whatsoever.
Would you at least agree that the “GB was just trolling Yamato” claim is kinda dumb? As I said before, Ryo did that with Raizo because he wanted to mock them for thinking that he had such a huge weakness (fire), and it’s not like he ever explicitly stated he was trolling Yamato like he did with Raizo, and I’m sure someone would’ve mentioned by now if the Japanese text had a sarcastic tone to it.
Would you at least agree that the “GB was just trolling Yamato” claim is kinda dumb? As I said before, Ryo did that with Raizo because he wanted to mock them for thinking that he had such a huge weakness (fire), and it’s not like he ever explicitly stated he was trolling Yamato like he did with Raizo, and I’m sure someone would’ve mentioned by now if the Japanese text had a sarcastic tone to it.
What she did was less than what Jozu did to Kuzan though, and I think that probably speaks to Aramaki´s durability more so than to Yamatos AP.
