Super Role Madness Pokemon: I choose you!
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags digimon is better sylveon is pretty hot too vaporeon party
Good evening, my new mafia friends! I hope this new day phase finds you well (except Jan, who I notice is sadly deceased).
When I agreed to participate in this game, I had no idea what the phases were, how long it would go on for, or how long I could expect to survive. Unfortunately, I'm now in the position where the game is clashing with a five-day business trip that commenced at 2am today for me. This means that I won't be around very much until Saturday, and although there will be a couple of hours each evening where I am able to be online, you can expect my level of activity to drop significantly while I'm away.
Please rest assured this has nothing at all to do with the level of fun I am having playing with you all, and is simply an unfortunate consequence of real-life commitments clashing with how much I would like to be involved here.
When I agreed to participate in this game, I had no idea what the phases were, how long it would go on for, or how long I could expect to survive. Unfortunately, I'm now in the position where the game is clashing with a five-day business trip that commenced at 2am today for me. This means that I won't be around very much until Saturday, and although there will be a couple of hours each evening where I am able to be online, you can expect my level of activity to drop significantly while I'm away.
Please rest assured this has nothing at all to do with the level of fun I am having playing with you all, and is simply an unfortunate consequence of real-life commitments clashing with how much I would like to be involved here.
@Polar Bear ideas?
Vote lynch Orca
Let us see if this sticks better today, now that we're out of third parties to string up.
I'm confused about the wording of "destroy one of their incoming actions"
To me this reads two ways:
1. If the person targets Jan with something, and Jan targets them as well, then the action being made (i.e. "incoming" on Jan) will be destroyed
2. If Jan targets the person, then one of the actions targeting them by another player (i.e. "incoming" on Jan's target) will be destroyed
Given the wording, "one of their incoming actions", and the likelihood of one person targeting Jan with multiple actions, I'm going to guess that the latter meaning is the correct one, and that Jan may have been cancelling out actions on his targets, instead of cancelling the actions of his targets as intended.
Let us see if this sticks better today, now that we're out of third parties to string up.
I'm confused about the wording of "destroy one of their incoming actions"
To me this reads two ways:
1. If the person targets Jan with something, and Jan targets them as well, then the action being made (i.e. "incoming" on Jan) will be destroyed
2. If Jan targets the person, then one of the actions targeting them by another player (i.e. "incoming" on Jan's target) will be destroyed
Given the wording, "one of their incoming actions", and the likelihood of one person targeting Jan with multiple actions, I'm going to guess that the latter meaning is the correct one, and that Jan may have been cancelling out actions on his targets, instead of cancelling the actions of his targets as intended.
