Leaker agenda dead within days. Zoro made imu defend with haki on his tail. Then defended against his attack, that exploded on everyone else, and was only left with [allegedly] minimal damage.
5☆ chapter just for not getting insta killed by the 2nd strongest character in the series
Imu used a bogger flame as attack, left Zoro screaming in pain on the ground.
His actually weapon which he used to cut Gerd fingers, that weapon wasn´t even needed against Zoro...
Meanwhile Mihawk used his main weapon vs pre ts Zoro...
Idk why they can't be satisfied with Kaido being among those that were the top of the current gen instead of exposing him to slander by doing comparison to much more relevant charactes in the grand scheme of the story.
Kaido was impressive alright, but a simple armement tatsumaki in beast form made him cough blood and spit Luffy (with Big Mom herself confirming he cut Kaido scales) for a KOH move of the dragon/serpent he'd need to counter it with his own coc coated named attacks or he'll suffer
Davy cannot be worse, because he represents D., which means Freedom. Also, Davy is not Teach and whatever BB will do that will not surpass evil that Imu did.
Imu, in his crimes, is someone who can rival only Freeza.
Davy cannot be worse, because he represents D., which means Freedom. Also, Davy is not Teach and whatever BB will do that will not surpass evil that Imu did.
Imu, in his crimes, is someone who can rival only Freeza.
Mm, irrelevant when you can't say yes or no is awfully convenient. So is Rankyaku much more effective than Shigan?
I get it. You came to casually "troll the z-bois." And now you actually have to contend. I didn't even get to the fact that from "!" Imu didn't opt to use his weapon and instead used skills Zoro didn't anticipate, whereas he went kick for kick and destroyed the guy who does nothing but kick. LMAO
Even if he did, why would that matter to TAC's argument that bigger attacks are more meaningful?
Mm, irrelevant when you can't say yes or no is awfully convenient. So is Rankyaku much more effective than Shigan?
I get it. You came to casually "troll the z-bois." And now you actually have to contend. I didn't even get to the fact that from "!" Imu didn't opt to use his weapon and instead used skills Zoro didn't anticipate, whereas he went kick for kick and destroyed the guy who does nothing but kick. LMAO
Even if he did, why would that matter to TAC's argument that bigger attacks are more meaningful?
Mm, irrelevant when you can't say yes or no is awfully convenient. So is Rankyaku much more effective than Shigan?
I get it. You came to casually "troll the z-bois." And now you actually have to contend. I didn't even get to the fact that from "!" Imu didn't opt to use his weapon and instead used skills Zoro didn't anticipate, whereas he went kick for kick and destroyed the guy who does nothing but kick. LMAO
I dont see imu using his tail as some acknowledgement of his skills, just the opposite. Like Zoro's swords meant little to him so he didn't deign to block it with his blade.
Both sanji and zoro were helpless and ineffectual here. Trying to go "nuh uh, zoro was shown stronger! nuh uh, sanji was!" is dumb on both sides, they got the exact same treatment here: as meaningless to Imu
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.