According to his own account, Reloaded is being held captive in the Loki fandom,should we rescue him


  • Total voters
    50
https://x.com/WorstGenHQ/status/2068200554354954467?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet

So Ragnir has white fur with blue highlights? Makes sense I guess, generic ice-related colours.

Also, does Imunko have red skin after he possessed her? Does that count as confirmation Imu has red skin like a devil? Or is it just slightly off colouring/meant to be a lighting effect?
I didn't expect white fur for Ragnir, nor blue either.

And Imunko "red skin" - this reminds me of Kenpachi's Bankai.

:shocked::steef::steef::steef::steef::steef::shocking:
 
Bulma was also 15 at the start of Dragon Ball, and was in even more perverted situations. Funny how nobody else calls Toriyama out for it, though.
Over 40 years ago, different times and Oda has been doing it plenty of times throughout the manga just for the sake of it, whereas Akira turned it into comedy elements and pretty much dropped it midway through classic or at the very least in Z, asside from a few jokes.
 
Over 40 years ago, different times and Oda has been doing it plenty of times throughout the manga just for the sake of it, whereas Akira turned it into comedy elements and pretty much dropped it midway through classic or at the very least in Z, asside from a few jokes.
You mean, when it became the Goku and Vegeta Power Hour and every other supporting character meant fuck all.

Also, with how many blatant fanservice moments Bulma had in DB, I rather doubt Toriyama entirely was for shits and giggles.

Gunko's outfit is dumb, though. It should at least look like a Fire Emblem Pegasus Knight’s tunic.
 
You mean, when it became the Goku and Vegeta Power Hour and every other supporting character meant fuck all.

Also, with how many blatant fanservice moments Bulma had in DB, I rather doubt Toriyama entirely was for shits and giggles.

Gunko's outfit is dumb, though. It should at least look like a Fire Emblem Pegasus Knight’s tunic.
Well, it was at least not as blatant obvious due to the comedy elements and Akira was way younger.
At least he stopped, whereas Oda, the older he get's the more degenerate and deprived content he draws for some reason.
A guy in his mid -late twenties doing some light hearted panty jokes 40 years ago about a 15- 16 years old cartoon character, isn't nearly as bad as some dude in his early to mid 50s with kids and a wife constantly drawing kids looking like grown women physically, in tight and revealing clothes....Asside from that, the entire manga is plagued with over sexualization, DB is peanuts compared to that.

Not defending any of it, but there is levels to it and the context matters....
 
A guy in his mid -late twenties doing some light hearted panty jokes 40 years ago about a 15- 16 years old cartoon character, isn't nearly as bad as some dude in his early to mid 50s with kids and a wife constantly drawing kids looking like grown women physically, in tight and revealing clothes....Asside from that, the entire manga is plagued with over sexualization, DB is peanuts compared to that.
Explain GT and Bra then. Because he certainly wasn't his 20's then.

This isn't directed at you: I just don't abide hypocrisy and this cesspool is filled to the brim with them.
 
Top