Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
There has been no shift. He just doesn't send massive walls of text anymore. The tone is still the same.
But it is literally adding bureaucracy to a basic human function. I don't care for the 'eugenics' argument people make, I just feel as if adding human systems to restrict something as core to human survival as parenthood will result in catastrophic ends.
In addition, I would not trust the individuals who even decide who can have children. In our modern day society, they would make it purely ideological, allowing only people of their political alignment to breed.
Bro cast the first stone by calling Nameless your evil counterpart. He was only nice as long as someone pitied him for his CPTSD. The moment anyone questioned his true faith - communism - and his preference of it over his professed faith, Christianity, he unmasked.
I didn't call him fake because of you. I called him fake because how can a man consider a follower of god to be the evil counterpart of you, one who would dethrone his god and calls him immoral? It makes no logical sense and speaks of a deceptive actor, a false preacher, if you will.
But it is literally adding bureaucracy to a basic human function. I don't care for the 'eugenics' argument people make, I just feel as if adding human systems to restrict something as core to human survival as parenthood will result in catastrophic ends.
In addition, I would not trust the individuals who even decide who can have children. In our modern day society, they would make it purely ideological, allowing only people of their political alignment to breed.
Bro cast the first stone by calling Nameless your evil counterpart. He was only nice as long as someone pitied him for his CPTSD. The moment anyone questioned his true faith - communism - and his preference of it over his professed faith, Christianity, he unmasked.
I didn't call him fake because of you. I called him fake because how can a man consider a follower of god to be the evil counterpart of you, one who would dethrone his god and calls him immoral? It makes no logical sense and speaks of a deceptive actor, a false preacher, if you will.
I mean man, my opinion is this:
Midnight, Okama, and Nameless genuenly have been dogging on me for quite a couple of pages now constantly
And you have a dislike of me from my preaching of christianity, so you want to justify them, but not fully because you see what they say, like Nameless calling me I don't even remember exactly what, bastard, moronic something, that they could trash me now, etc, in just one message, so you just imply it because of your previous dislike of me
Midnight, Okama, and Nameless genuenly have been dogging on me for quite a couple of pages now constantly
And you have a dislike of me from my preaching of christianity, so you want to justify them, but not fully because you see what they say, like Nameless calling me I don't even remember exactly what, bastard, moronic something, that they could trash me now, etc, in just one message, so you just imply it because of your previous dislike of me
I think I'm still nice, did my behaviour drastically change?
And yeah, Nameless is evil Logiko, it's a joke
"Evil X be like"
Nameless talks exactly like Logiko ( aside from his actual insanity, this man said in just one message that I was moronic, a bastard, that he could now trash on me, etc, that in my opinion is an actual big red flag for being mentally unwell ), but holds the exact opposite views, catholic, far right, thinks nazis are socialists, thinks his government is communist, etc
And yeah, Nameless is evil Logiko, it's a joke
"Evil X be like"
Nameless talks exactly like Logiko ( aside from his actual insanity, this man said in just one message that I was moronic, a bastard, that he could now trash on me, etc, that in my opinion is an actual big red flag for being mentally unwell ), but holds the exact opposite views, catholic, far right, thinks nazis are socialists, thinks his government is communist, etc
I don't know about parental stuff
The fact is that a kid can just be born and be brutalised by their parents in abuse and have their life destroyed, if it wasn't for intervention from God, CPS, or something
Psalm 27:10
10 When my father and my mother forsake me, then the Lord will take me up.
You can live your life being completely destroyed, dehuminased, beat and abused your entire childhood, and then it's assumed you had the same opportunities as others and you're expected to function and have the same foundation, nobody helps you, it's all on you
The fact is that a kid can just be born and be brutalised by their parents in abuse and have their life destroyed, if it wasn't for intervention from God, CPS, or something
Psalm 27:10
10 When my father and my mother forsake me, then the Lord will take me up.
You can live your life being completely destroyed, dehuminased, beat and abused your entire childhood, and then it's assumed you had the same opportunities as others and you're expected to function and have the same foundation, nobody helps you, it's all on you
I think programs to help people who were abused are so much more important than stopping abuse, that programs that stop abuse should be irelevant in comparison
That's because idk if you can stop abuse, but
Many many many many many people who were abused want to try to heal and do well, and that's a more certain way to approach helping those people who were abused, in general
That's because idk if you can stop abuse, but
Many many many many many people who were abused want to try to heal and do well, and that's a more certain way to approach helping those people who were abused, in general
Nobody can truly determine if someone will be a good parent. The person who sets the terms is the government, and depending on the regime, what is enforced is inevitably going to be different. For example, I'm certain leftists would be concerned a far-right government would prevent homosexuals from adopting, or maybe prevent foreigners from having kids. Meanwhile, right-wing individuals may be concerned of that a left-wing government will prevent you from having kids for holding right wing views, or heck, in a communistic society, if you come from a rich family.
The reality is, these systems would have to be enforced by somebody, and can we truly say we'd be able to trust the authority to create a universal, politics-free law for who and who can't have children?
For example, I could argue that I don't think that the mentally ill - especially those with schizophrenia, psychopathy, or BPD should have children. However, I can already tell that will be considered 'sanist'.
Some people may say we shouldn't let felons have children. Then what does that say about the ability to rehabilitate?
It makes no sense. There shouldn't be prohibition on having children. That is a god-given right, so to speak.
The reality is, these systems would have to be enforced by somebody, and can we truly say we'd be able to trust the authority to create a universal, politics-free law for who and who can't have children?
For example, I could argue that I don't think that the mentally ill - especially those with schizophrenia, psychopathy, or BPD should have children. However, I can already tell that will be considered 'sanist'.
Some people may say we shouldn't let felons have children. Then what does that say about the ability to rehabilitate?
It makes no sense. There shouldn't be prohibition on having children. That is a god-given right, so to speak.
This is fatalism. I accept that horrible parents will create a more difficult upbringing and leave a child ill-equipped for life once they reach adulthood, but in a sense, that is just the luck of the draw. I was born to an incredibly abusive father. I have a good life now after years of problems that I had to get over.
Not all are born as fortunate. As someone from very unfortunate circumstances, I am okay with that.
Identifying who was abused is also part of the problem.
Not all are born as fortunate. As someone from very unfortunate circumstances, I am okay with that.
Identifying who was abused is also part of the problem.
Well you know, I'm sorry you had to go through that, BUT
As someone who got into an extremely good position too, every single part of my life was completely sabotaged in the past, not to mention my nervous system
I don't know what you went through, what can I say? That you're exaggerating your past, or that you're downplaying it after getting better?
But you understand what I'm getting at, it's not just the luck of the draw, not just a bad hand
As someone who got into an extremely good position too, every single part of my life was completely sabotaged in the past, not to mention my nervous system
I don't know what you went through, what can I say? That you're exaggerating your past, or that you're downplaying it after getting better?
But you understand what I'm getting at, it's not just the luck of the draw, not just a bad hand
When you're a kid getting brutalised daily, having your autonomy gone, when you should be learning about life and how to do stuff, that's not "luck of the draw"
"I'm okay with that"
Yeah man, YOU are ok with that
How about the fact that there are 10 year olds out there who got physically brutally assaulted by their parents today, who have no freedom, etc, what are they supposed to do?
Just luck of the draw, huh?
"I'm okay with that"
Yeah man, YOU are ok with that
How about the fact that there are 10 year olds out there who got physically brutally assaulted by their parents today, who have no freedom, etc, what are they supposed to do?
Just luck of the draw, huh?
@Okamakama in recent UK drama, Autism LGTB and Minority associations Opposed the Social Media regulation because they know just how many kids rely on Internet Friendship
And Leftist politicians just ignored them and talked about boomer ass "well I didn't have internet Friends and I ended up right"
It's actually disturbing that the fucking Libdems didn't oppose it, What's the fucking point of a classical liberal party if it keeps on compromising to both "common sense conservatives" and "well intentioned Leftists" to the point of never fighting for liberalism
You see this cancerous mentality all over Europe, not a single liberal party attacks leftists or "sensible conservatives" and just Shuck And Jiv for people who want them dead
And Leftist politicians just ignored them and talked about boomer ass "well I didn't have internet Friends and I ended up right"
It's actually disturbing that the fucking Libdems didn't oppose it, What's the fucking point of a classical liberal party if it keeps on compromising to both "common sense conservatives" and "well intentioned Leftists" to the point of never fighting for liberalism
You see this cancerous mentality all over Europe, not a single liberal party attacks leftists or "sensible conservatives" and just Shuck And Jiv for people who want them dead
I mean, it's part of many factors that caused me to have an identity disorder from ages 4 through 28? It was pretty bad, I suppose. I just don't go into detail.
Yep. Life isn't entirely fair. There will always be those who are blessed and those who are cursed. I accept the harsh reality and accept that I had to endure some horrible circumstances. Does me being okay with the world make me happy about it? No.
Lib Dems are considered a joke party by the majority of the populace for a reason. Absolute no spine - like a lot of liberals, to be honest.
Yep. Life isn't entirely fair. There will always be those who are blessed and those who are cursed. I accept the harsh reality and accept that I had to endure some horrible circumstances. Does me being okay with the world make me happy about it? No.
Lib Dems are considered a joke party by the majority of the populace for a reason. Absolute no spine - like a lot of liberals, to be honest.