Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
@Logiko @Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier @Okamakama
Asking AI for a summary
I asked: "Did Lenin demand that the soviets be placed under the bolsheviks?"
Reply:
Yes. While Lenin's initial public slogan in 1917 was "All Power to the Soviets!" (meaning power to the councils regardless of which socialist party held a majority), his ultimate strategic goal and subsequent actions established that the soviets had to be under the leadership and control of the Bolshevik Party.
The relationship between Lenin, the Bolsheviks, and the soviets evolved through distinct phases:
1. The Strategy of "Winning Over" the Soviets (1917)
Initially, Lenin did not demand that the soviets be subordinated to the Bolsheviks by decree, because the Bolsheviks were a minority in most soviets during the spring and summer of 1917.
Underpinning Lenin's entire political theory (outlined in works like What Is To Be Done?) was the concept of the vanguard party. Lenin firmly believed that the working class, left to itself, would only develop "trade union consciousness" rather than revolutionary socialist consciousness.
After taking power, as civil war, economic devastation, and political opposition mounted, the theoretical partnership between the party and the soviets quickly became a relationship of strict subordination:
Lenin did not initially demand that the soviets be placed under the Bolsheviks by force, preferring instead to win them over politically. However, he fundamentally believed that the Bolshevik Party must lead the working class. Once in power, he and the Bolshevik leadership systematically ensured that the soviets were entirely subordinated to the party's control, replacing broad soviet democracy with party dictatorship.
Asking AI for a summary
I asked: "Did Lenin demand that the soviets be placed under the bolsheviks?"
Reply:
Yes. While Lenin's initial public slogan in 1917 was "All Power to the Soviets!" (meaning power to the councils regardless of which socialist party held a majority), his ultimate strategic goal and subsequent actions established that the soviets had to be under the leadership and control of the Bolshevik Party.
The relationship between Lenin, the Bolsheviks, and the soviets evolved through distinct phases:
1. The Strategy of "Winning Over" the Soviets (1917)
Initially, Lenin did not demand that the soviets be subordinated to the Bolsheviks by decree, because the Bolsheviks were a minority in most soviets during the spring and summer of 1917.
- Instead, Lenin argued that the Bolsheviks needed to win a political majority inside the existing soviets through democratic agitation and propaganda.
- Once the Bolsheviks gained majorities in key soviets (such as Petrograd and Moscow) in the autumn of 1917, Lenin pushed for the armed insurrection that overthrew the Provisional Government in the name of the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets.
Underpinning Lenin's entire political theory (outlined in works like What Is To Be Done?) was the concept of the vanguard party. Lenin firmly believed that the working class, left to itself, would only develop "trade union consciousness" rather than revolutionary socialist consciousness.
- Therefore, the working masses needed the Bolshevik Party to act as the "vanguard"—the brain and guide of the revolution.
- In Lenin's view, allowing the soviets to operate entirely independently of the party risked drifting away from strict Marxist-Leninist objectives. The party had to lead the soviets to ensure the revolution succeeded.
After taking power, as civil war, economic devastation, and political opposition mounted, the theoretical partnership between the party and the soviets quickly became a relationship of strict subordination:
- Marginalization of Soviet Democracy: When rival parties (such as the Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries) or even disgruntled workers won majorities in certain local soviets, the Bolshevik government frequently dissolved those soviets, manipulated elections, or declared martial law.
- Party Supremacy: Real decision-making authority was stripped from the broad-based soviets and concentrated in the Bolshevik Party's Central Committee and Politburo.
- The Single-Party Monopoly: By the early 1920s, the soviets had ceased to be independent deliberative bodies of workers and peasants. Instead, they were transformed into administrative rubber stamps for policies already decided by the leadership of the Communist (Bolshevik) Party.
Lenin did not initially demand that the soviets be placed under the Bolsheviks by force, preferring instead to win them over politically. However, he fundamentally believed that the Bolshevik Party must lead the working class. Once in power, he and the Bolshevik leadership systematically ensured that the soviets were entirely subordinated to the party's control, replacing broad soviet democracy with party dictatorship.
I also asked:
"What were the soviets pre-USSR?"
Reply:
Before the formal creation of the Soviet Union (USSR) in December 1922, soviets (Russian for "councils") were grassroots, democratic assemblies formed by urban workers, peasants, and soldiers.
Originally emerging spontaneously during times of crisis, they evolved from temporary strike committees into powerful rival organs of government. Their pre-USSR history spans three major phases:
1. The Origin: The 1905 Revolution
The first soviets appeared during the abortive Russian Revolution of 1905 in response to economic hardship and political autocracy, most notably in St. Petersburg (Petrograd).
Soviets reappeared almost overnight following the collapse of the Tsarist regime during the February Revolution of 1917.
From February to October 1917, Russia experienced a unique system known as Dual Power (dvoevlastie):
Pre-USSR soviets began as spontaneous democratic strike committees created by ordinary workers in 1905. By 1917, they had grown into powerful, parallel governing bodies representing the armed working masses, ultimately serving as the political vehicle that brought the Bolsheviks to power.
"What were the soviets pre-USSR?"
Reply:
Before the formal creation of the Soviet Union (USSR) in December 1922, soviets (Russian for "councils") were grassroots, democratic assemblies formed by urban workers, peasants, and soldiers.
Originally emerging spontaneously during times of crisis, they evolved from temporary strike committees into powerful rival organs of government. Their pre-USSR history spans three major phases:
1. The Origin: The 1905 Revolution
The first soviets appeared during the abortive Russian Revolution of 1905 in response to economic hardship and political autocracy, most notably in St. Petersburg (Petrograd).
- Workers' Councils: Striking factory workers elected delegates to coordinate labor strikes, manage local distribution of funds, and maintain public order.
- Political Voice: The St. Petersburg Soviet quickly expanded beyond a mere labor committee into a de facto municipal government and political voice for the working class, demanding civil liberties and a democratic republic.
- Suppression: When the 1905 revolution was crushed by the Tsar’s regime, the soviets were forcibly shut down and their leaders arrested.
Soviets reappeared almost overnight following the collapse of the Tsarist regime during the February Revolution of 1917.
- The Petrograd Soviet: The Petrograd Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies was formed first, setting a template for hundreds of similar councils to spring up in towns, cities, and military units across the Russian Empire.
- The Soldiers' Committees: Crucially, unlike in 1905, the 1917 soviets included large numbers of peasant-soldiers. For example, Soviet Order No. 1 instructed soldiers to obey their military officers only if their commands did not contradict the directives of the Petrograd Soviet, effectively breaking traditional military discipline.
From February to October 1917, Russia experienced a unique system known as Dual Power (dvoevlastie):
- The Provisional Government: An official, self-appointed government composed of liberal and moderate bourgeois politicians whose authority lacked a true democratic mandate.
- The Soviets: The unofficial, grassroots assemblies representing the armed masses, workers, and peasants. They held the actual physical power (control over factories, railroads, and the military garrisons), while the Provisional Government held the legal title.
- Radicalization: Initially, moderate socialists (Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries) dominated the soviets, cooperating with the Provisional Government. However, as the government failed to pull Russia out of World War I or enact land reform, radical factions—specifically Lenin's Bolsheviks—gained immense popularity by promising “Peace, Land, and Bread” and “All Power to the Soviets!”
- The October Revolution: In October 1917, the Bolsheviks used their majorities in key soviets to coordinate the armed insurrection that overthrew the Provisional Government, transferring state authority to the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets.
- Transition to State Organs: Between 1917 and 1922 (before the Union treaty officially created the USSR), the soviets served as the formal foundation of the new Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR).
Pre-USSR soviets began as spontaneous democratic strike committees created by ordinary workers in 1905. By 1917, they had grown into powerful, parallel governing bodies representing the armed working masses, ultimately serving as the political vehicle that brought the Bolsheviks to power.
feels like missing a limb