https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1x5v797
I feel like the Super-Predator AI Companies are literally making it so that either their crazy, bastardization of the markets is allowed, and they get rich as fuck in the process, or, they crash the economy intentionally, and buy up the pieces to gain more assets.

Lose/lose for nature/decent people, big wins either way for the parasites.

The only actual solution is removing the Epstein Class from power, and capping the wealth individuals, families, and business groups can maintain.

The problem was always rich people.

Always.
 


Please, people, watch "Naza" if you can (the version of the Venice festival, not the newly released documentary from Israel to bury the case). I didn't watch it yet, but I got an idea of the content. This should be the definitive waking up call for people who have doubt regarding the situation in Gaza. It's nothing new for those who follow the situation, but it's everything necessary to hear.

Should be streaming soon (i hope)
 


Please, people, watch "Naza" if you can (the version of the Venice festival, not the newly released documentary from Israel to bury the case). I didn't watch it yet, but I got an idea of the content. This should be the definitive waking up call for people who have doubt regarding the situation in Gaza. It's nothing new for those who follow the situation, but it's everything necessary to hear.

Should be streaming soon (i hope)
I've seen it in cinema. It's kind of left-wing zionism. It's interesting how the directors are on trial for that only. Documentaries about Palestinians is becoming a marketing trend for a certain lefty audience. I was tricked into watching it too.

But this film could have been made about any other nation at war because we do not learn anything new and it's mostly soldiers talking about how war and massacres are difficult. Naza is supposed to mean collateral damage. Which is an idea that every army basically shares.

The biggest flaw is about the idea of genocide itself. In 1h20minutes one of the directors asks if it is a genocide only once, and only one soldier says that yes he has taken part in one. They're still wondering if it is a genocide by showing images of Claude Lanzmann and only one same soldier saying that now he knows what the nazis are like because he is basically one of them now.

The whole movie consists of interviews of some IDF soldiers hidden in the dark talking about what they did. Are we supposed to feel empathy for them ? It's not like most of them hadn't chose that specific career for their case.

The director who interviews the soldiers is doing such a bad job wether it's artistically or scientifically. The film has no value to me except to look at it with a critical point of view and despise some of the left who enjoyed the film like an Overton window.

How they edited the interviews is also a problem I guess. There is a moment when a soldier seems to be questioning himself about his social status of upper class in Tel Aviv that should make him a left-winger but then it's edited by something else and we don't get to hear his full sentence.

Very soft and super shy film.
 
I've seen it in cinema. It's kind of left-wing zionism. It's interesting how the directors are on trial for that only. Documentaries about Palestinians is becoming a marketing trend for a certain lefty audience. I was tricked into watching it too.

But this film could have been made about any other nation at war because we do not learn anything new and it's mostly soldiers talking about how war and massacres are difficult. Naza is supposed to mean collateral damage. Which is an idea that every army basically shares.

The biggest flaw is about the idea of genocide itself. In 1h20minutes one of the directors asks if it is a genocide only once, and only one soldier says that yes he has taken part in one. They're still wondering if it is a genocide by showing images of Claude Lanzmann and only one same soldier saying that now he knows what the nazis are like because he is basically one of them now.

The whole movie consists of interviews of some IDF soldiers hidden in the dark talking about what they did. Are we supposed to feel empathy for them ? It's not like most of them hadn't chose that specific career for their case.

The director who interviews the soldiers is doing such a bad job wether it's artistically or scientifically. The film has no value to me except to look at it with a critical point of view and despise some of the left who enjoyed the film like an Overton window.

How they edited the interviews is also a problem I guess. There is a moment when a soldier seems to be questioning himself about his social status of upper class in Tel Aviv that should make him a left-winger but then it's edited by something else and we don't get to hear his full sentence.

Very soft and super shy film.
I think I'll completely agree with you once I see it.

Looking at the reactions of apoliticized and ignorant people on the subject, I prefer to wait for everyone to watch it to then list every BS. Seems like - for them - it is shocking enough to be a waking up call.

Clearly a reception like this is only possible because the voice of arabs are not taken into account, this should have been the basis 3 years ago and by now everyone should have seen the horrors that we did, but I'll trust the strategy.

The lives of Palestinian are on the line. Everyone must wake up.
 
Top