Powers & Abilities So Zoro can counter DJ now
- Thread starter Kishido
- Start date
Which is not something ridiculous to think at all.
He learned to fly in order to run away from the people there.
Not unreasonable to imagine he also learned how to hide his presence as well.
If that was the case, it SHOULD have been shown already, but the best thing about timeskip, is that the author can ass pull a bunch of shit using flashbacks at any time. A lazy trick, but a doable one.
I said "best", but I actually mean "trash".
Just to be clear.
He learned to fly in order to run away from the people there.
Not unreasonable to imagine he also learned how to hide his presence as well.
If that was the case, it SHOULD have been shown already, but the best thing about timeskip, is that the author can ass pull a bunch of shit using flashbacks at any time. A lazy trick, but a doable one.
I said "best", but I actually mean "trash".
Just to be clear.
It’s possible it’s been shown slightly. Remember Katakuri couldn’t figure out what triggered puddings shutdown on the wedding he just saw the shut down. Which doesn’t track with being able to see entire conversations a few chapters prior.
[automerge]1610817561[/automerge]
I mean Katakuri couldn’t see why pudding had a shut down in the wedding despite being able to see and hear an entire conversation a few chapters prior
[automerge]1610817561[/automerge]
I mean Katakuri couldn’t see why pudding had a shut down in the wedding despite being able to see and hear an entire conversation a few chapters prior
True. He should have been able to sense Sanji's reaction to Pudding's eye, since it was the main signal for the assassination plot. Nice to think he couldn't predict Sanji's action, and failed to hit him, because he dodged. Kinda cool to think about it, but, as things stands, it's just assumption.
Luffy "cleared his mind" in order for Enel not to be able to use Mantra on him. So, CoO have some counters already adressed.
Luffy "cleared his mind" in order for Enel not to be able to use Mantra on him. So, CoO have some counters already adressed.
Yeah I don’t think it’s “advanced CoO” just Sanji may know a way to hide himself from basic observation haki since he was running hiding stealing and fighting for two years straight
[automerge]1610818028[/automerge]
Heat and fire are two different things.
Foxfire style doesn’t extinguish heat or fire just cuts it?
[automerge]1610818028[/automerge]
Heat and fire are two different things.
Foxfire style doesn’t extinguish heat or fire just cuts it?
Animated adaptation is as valid as a source, as the original material.
Because the animated adaptation is NOT the original material.
"Canon", as people talk like simply being "the original source" it's not the only meaning for it, as there are lots of debates at the academic world about what it means a "canon literature".
You don't see people cashing Marvel's Thor just because it doesn't strictly follow norse mythology. do you? Is Marvel's Thor something "non-canon"?
Adaptation can come in many forms, and, aside from the cases where the adaptation is merely done to promote the original source, like many animes do, for instance, any adaptation is its own "canon" material.
"Filler" is just as exceptional case of sideline stuff that have 0 impact on the story whatsoever.
Saying a character did something in the anime, but should not be considerer "canon", just because it wasn't shown in the manga, is a misconception about the purpose of an adaptation.
Peace.
Because the animated adaptation is NOT the original material.
"Canon", as people talk like simply being "the original source" it's not the only meaning for it, as there are lots of debates at the academic world about what it means a "canon literature".
You don't see people cashing Marvel's Thor just because it doesn't strictly follow norse mythology. do you? Is Marvel's Thor something "non-canon"?
Adaptation can come in many forms, and, aside from the cases where the adaptation is merely done to promote the original source, like many animes do, for instance, any adaptation is its own "canon" material.
"Filler" is just as exceptional case of sideline stuff that have 0 impact on the story whatsoever.
Saying a character did something in the anime, but should not be considerer "canon", just because it wasn't shown in the manga, is a misconception about the purpose of an adaptation.
Peace.
Nope.
Mythological thor is an inspiration, not source material.
And the distinguishment between canon manga and anime is irrelevant since we are discussing the manga, the only thing relevant to discuss.
Everything else stems from the manga, there are no separate mediums from each other, everything is based on the one and only canon story.
Mythological thor is an inspiration, not source material.
And the distinguishment between canon manga and anime is irrelevant since we are discussing the manga, the only thing relevant to discuss.
Everything else stems from the manga, there are no separate mediums from each other, everything is based on the one and only canon story.
They are separate mediums.
One is a written and drawn story on a comic, the other one is a animated series for digital media.
And disregarding the non-manga material is kinda weird, because Oda is not a omnipotent entity that can cover every single aspect of his story. Often offscreening things that are filled in the anime.
He participates in the production of movies as well.
The manga is the SOURCE. The ORIGINAL stuff. But its not the only VALID one. Mixing these is simply wrong. It's not a matter of "what I think its right". It's how adaptation works.
One is a written and drawn story on a comic, the other one is a animated series for digital media.
And disregarding the non-manga material is kinda weird, because Oda is not a omnipotent entity that can cover every single aspect of his story. Often offscreening things that are filled in the anime.
He participates in the production of movies as well.
The manga is the SOURCE. The ORIGINAL stuff. But its not the only VALID one. Mixing these is simply wrong. It's not a matter of "what I think its right". It's how adaptation works.
Still irrelevant since one is based on the other.
Oda writes the story and draws it, everything else is an interpretation and adaptation of that. Whatever Oda can or cant do is irrelevant, what he does is relevant.
He has no influence on the story of movies, he bas no hand in the anime.
What you are saying is factually wrong, read up the definition of canon.
What you are referring to is if a source material gets adaptations in different mediums ( quite often for light novels for example, witb anime and manga adaptation) or if the writer of a source material is actively involved as showrunner or even head writer of an adaptation, Oda has nothing to do with the anime, as he himself pointed out several times.
Oda writes the story and draws it, everything else is an interpretation and adaptation of that. Whatever Oda can or cant do is irrelevant, what he does is relevant.
He has no influence on the story of movies, he bas no hand in the anime.
What you are saying is factually wrong, read up the definition of canon.
What you are referring to is if a source material gets adaptations in different mediums ( quite often for light novels for example, witb anime and manga adaptation) or if the writer of a source material is actively involved as showrunner or even head writer of an adaptation, Oda has nothing to do with the anime, as he himself pointed out several times.
