Controversial Will Oda abandon the LGBT Agenda?
- Thread starter thisnewtechnique
- Start date
Art is expression. Every piece of art you’ve ever read, seen or experienced is the result of an artist pushing something. Especially the pieces of art that tend to resonate profoundly and stand the test of time.
Oda’s message isn’t one of encouraging people to become trans.
His message is the same it has been: existence is not a crime.
Oda chooses to show trans characters as interesting and positive role models. Hollywood tends to fixate on what makes them look and feel like freaks. Oda has a fundamentally more humanist view.
tldr - all art pushes for things. If you're against the principle it's not wrong for trans people to exist, that's something for you to deal with personally.
Oda’s message isn’t one of encouraging people to become trans.
His message is the same it has been: existence is not a crime.
Oda chooses to show trans characters as interesting and positive role models. Hollywood tends to fixate on what makes them look and feel like freaks. Oda has a fundamentally more humanist view.
tldr - all art pushes for things. If you're against the principle it's not wrong for trans people to exist, that's something for you to deal with personally.
Art is expression. Every piece of art you’ve ever read, seen or experienced is the result of an artist pushing something. Especially the pieces of art that tend to resonate profoundly and stand the test of time.
Oda’s message isn’t one of encouraging people to become trans.
His message is the same it has been: existence is not a crime.
Oda chooses to show trans characters as interesting and positive role models. Hollywood tends to fixate on what makes them look and feel like freaks. Oda has a fundamentally more humanist view.
tldr - all art pushes for things. If you're against the principle it's not wrong for trans people to exist, that's something for you to deal with personally.
Oda’s message isn’t one of encouraging people to become trans.
His message is the same it has been: existence is not a crime.
Oda chooses to show trans characters as interesting and positive role models. Hollywood tends to fixate on what makes them look and feel like freaks. Oda has a fundamentally more humanist view.
tldr - all art pushes for things. If you're against the principle it's not wrong for trans people to exist, that's something for you to deal with personally.
Worst Gen users after reading his message:
So is Sanji a CoC candidate or not? How many sweat drops has Zoro on his face ? Is a Luffy = Sanji agenda possible? Why are they gay?
I want to add that Oda seems Mich less dogmatic than modern mainstream western productions. Throughout the manga he's been showing different interpretations of what it means to not fit in the binary, heteronormative majority. There are drag queens like Iva, those that switch between male and female like Inazuma, born males that naturally behave female since childhood like Kiku, those who act more like the other gender because of how/by whom they were raised like Dellinger etc.
This is actually a more realistic reflection of reality than what the west seems to be pushing these days. Throughout history, different cultures had different concepts of identities that exist between male and female.
This is actually a more realistic reflection of reality than what the west seems to be pushing these days. Throughout history, different cultures had different concepts of identities that exist between male and female.
Regardless of what month it is, there are usually two camps. some of them feel threatened by the culture shifts, while others are insecure they might be lgbtq themselves. Although some people genuinely don't give a shit but still choose to hate because they think that makes them cool and edgy, kind of like how now they call anything DEI if it even dares to stray from hetero/gender/race norms.
1. insecurities or they’re just unhappy and full of hate and gay, bi etc. people are easy targets
2. I believe in objective morality but there are many people who define morality according their egos and environment
They don’t care and just go with the majority or strong group
3. one overlooked one, ignorance
They don’t know it any better and never met lgbtq people or they’re too young
Fag was a normal slur when I was in grade 5-9
Nearly everyone said it and most of us didn’t think of the negative weight. We just said it because everyone said it even if we didn’t hate gay people
I hope someday everyone will understand that the heart is the most imposant thing and that no one should be judged for the things they didn’t choose to be
2. I believe in objective morality but there are many people who define morality according their egos and environment
They don’t care and just go with the majority or strong group
3. one overlooked one, ignorance
They don’t know it any better and never met lgbtq people or they’re too young
Fag was a normal slur when I was in grade 5-9
Nearly everyone said it and most of us didn’t think of the negative weight. We just said it because everyone said it even if we didn’t hate gay people
I hope someday everyone will understand that the heart is the most imposant thing and that no one should be judged for the things they didn’t choose to be
