Controversial Venting Thread - Mafia Edition

EkkoLoJinx

Hate me... so long as you're alive to do it...
when i was 12-13, some guy i knew online that i was friendly with found out my full name and address and stuff via some intense stalking and randomly sent a screenshot to me
if i just pressed the ignore button, would that have fixed everything?
would that have stopped me from being affected by it?

idk any specifics as to potential stalking/harassment that may or may not have happened with beta to watson (nor do i think it is anyone's place to pry) but its ridiculous to say that an ignore button would have solved everything
that isnt SA. it doesnt apply to what i was saying. thats a much more serious thing and cant be ignored. you may need to call the cops for it too

what im saying is all online SA can be ignored
 

EkkoLoJinx

Hate me... so long as you're alive to do it...
But Ekko…as per your own fucking analogy that for some reason u continue to use, you do realize someone who actually commits SA is locked up farrrrrr longer than just the year they made said offense? Your argument sounds so dumb
they r locked up 2 to 20 years depending on severity. online ones r actually sometimes locked up less than an year. look it up
 
You don't care about women, you certainly don't care about rape survivors, your analogies are incredibly offensive, you don't care about the fact that you're playing scumbag lawyer for a guy who has not rendered a single believable apology and has made continuous recent attempts to defame Hime, and you keep changing your fucking story. First you wanted to take it democratically, and then when everyone and their mother was against it you were suddenly against democracy and wanted to take it up with the mods, and then when the mods tell you no you go "but I didn't get what I want this is totalitarianism, we need an impartial judge because an impartial judge would agree with me" You're so fucking fake dude
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
that isnt SA. it doesnt apply to what i was saying. thats a much more serious thing and cant be ignored. you may need to call the cops for it too

what im saying is all online SA can be ignored
"It's their fault for letting it happen in the first place." I'm warning you to stop. We had a guy get banned for defending pedophilia, and here you are trying to defend SA.

Actually telling people that instead of reporting nasty behavior, just ignore it and let him harass someone else.
 

EkkoLoJinx

Hate me... so long as you're alive to do it...
First of all, no, Hime referenced the rape allegory that you originally made when this was being argued about prior to the vent threads existence, and secondly no that's what you said.That is de facto what you said and are saying
1. i dont think anything is wrong with hime referencing the rape analogy here. i dont see ur point. its showcasing an extreme case. it only helps my case because even an extreme case has limited punishment.
2. not at all because thats dumb. i stated that the victims had the option to ignore but never did. i suspect there may be an element of enjoying betas posts, drama, attention etc.. but i dont have proof so im not pushing on this. if you have a plausible theory as to why the ignore button was never used hit me up. it could also be not working at the time. i got 0 evidence there.

i never said the victims "didnt fight enough". we arent talking about someone breaking in their house or whatever. there is no fighting online unless you are willing to take it. im saying entirely the opposite. the victims could have avoided the confortation and the fighting entirely but didnt do it. im not saying watson/hime shud have argued with beta in 2020 and show him whose the boss. thats stupid
 
This is the time to actually listen to these people @EkkoLoJinx.

They are right. You can't make light of rape victims and whoever started the comparison smack yourself as well. I have no dog in this fight but yeah ussop apologize and let it go.
 
1. i dont think anything is wrong with hime referencing the rape analogy here. i dont see ur point. its showcasing an extreme case. it only helps my case because even an extreme case has limited punishment.
2. not at all because thats dumb. i stated that the victims had the option to ignore but never did. i suspect there may be an element of enjoying betas posts, drama, attention etc.. but i dont have proof so im not pushing on this. if you have a plausible theory as to why the ignore button was never used hit me up. it could also be not working at the time. i got 0 evidence there.

i never said the victims "didnt fight enough". we arent talking about someone breaking in their house or whatever. there is no fighting online unless you are willing to take it. im saying entirely the opposite. the victims could have avoided the confortation and the fighting entirely but didnt do it. im not saying watson/hime shud have argued with beta in 2020 and show him whose the boss. thats stupid
But why are you still continuing to clearly put outright blame on the victims and trying to act like that’s not literally exactly what you’re doing just so you can make some strange justification for this guy being able to play games, I’m confused…?
 
But hey man, getting the little guy to play mafia games is more important than respecting the boundaries Ratchet put in place for the section and women. God, we have been so wrong, Hayumi. Don't you see?
 

EkkoLoJinx

Hate me... so long as you're alive to do it...
And also this ain’t the god damn law Ekko.

Forums can run things how they individually see fit, especially when it comes to someone who clearly was a repeat offender.
cool. but beta hasnt harrased any woman here as far as i know so under what forum law they r banning him? it cant be WGs jurisdiction.

also thats another topic ive brought up. mods have too much subjective power. it allows a mod to keep beta or anyone else locked up for personal issues. its unjust. NF started dying when mods kept abusing subjective power.

if a mod just decided to one day hate on you they have the power to toss you off the site. mods arent stakeholder or anything. they dont own the site. they shouldnt have thay sort of power. they need to follow a constitution when making those decisions. it shouldn't be subjective
 
cool. but beta hasnt harrased any woman here as far as i know so under what forum law they r banning him? it cant be WGs jurisdiction.

also thats another topic ive brought up. mods have too much subjective power. it allows a mod to keep beta or anyone else locked up for personal issues. its unjust. NF started dying when mods kept abusing subjective power.

if a mod just decided to one day hate on you they have the power to toss you off the site. mods arent stakeholder or anything. they dont own the site. they shouldnt have thay sort of power. they need to follow a constitution when making those decisions. it shouldn't be subjective

Kinda like how ratchet did me.

irony. lol
 

EkkoLoJinx

Hate me... so long as you're alive to do it...
But hey man, getting the little guy to play mafia games is more important than respecting the boundaries Ratchet put in place for the section and women. God, we have been so wrong, Hayumi. Don't you see?
ive legitimately being nothing but respectful in this whole thing. im presenting my case and i know we wont agree. but we can maybe reach a middle ground where hes allowed to play in games in which you arent playing. that should be fair

you want to keep him from playing in a games which i think is unfair and not in your rights to do so
 
Top