yes we've literally been shown it on a dozen plus instances...
do you know how many towns the SHs have decimated and no one has died?
The strawhats have absolutely not "wiped town off the map". Causing damage while fighting is not the same as consistently destroying towns, and messing up a country.
didn't not even a single person die with Ace vs Teach or Akainu vs Aokiji.
We saw on Egghead the only people that "died" were vegapunks cause that was the actual mission...
We don't know what happened during Ace vs Teach, but the town was never said to have been "wiped off the map". Are casualties possible? Maybe.
Akainu and Kuzan fought on an abandoned island with no population on purpose.
Egghead was literally evacuated. Are you retarded?
& why was he undercover trying to arrest him & how is that wanting to "harm" him as you called it?
& youre not getting my point youre comparing 2 completely different parallels to fit your own agenda not the actual story that is being shown.
Corazon wanted to arrest Doflamingo because he believed Doflamingo to be an evil pirate, which he was. That doesn't change the fact that Oda did try to humanize Doflamingo.
rotflmfao you're clearly not even following or reading the actual story line, you just look at the picture and create false narratives to fit your head cannon... if you would actually follow along Rocks is more of a Revolutionary rather than a pirate, he started his journey solo invading Mariejois and confronting Imu themself declaring his intentions of dethroning Imu.
I'm pretty sure the boss of pirate island is in fact a pirate. I don't think that's up for a question. The difference between Xebec and the revolutionaries is that Xebec doesn't care about the oppressed people of the world, he cares about getting power for himself. Pretty simple
He's a Literal D. with possibly one of the strongest bloodlines & knowledge of the past and te void century overall so yes he does have a strong belief of politics & such,
It's interesting that despite his strong belief in politics he allegedly has, he has never stated a single thing he intends to do to improve the world, or the common persons life. It's all about him and his ambition. Compare that to Dragon, who last time we saw was worrying about potential wars over territory harming the average person.
if he didnt why tf would his journey and declaration begin in the holy land directly to Imu... you think he just randomly waltz in and stumbled upon that confrontation, no it was calculated and timed & Imu addressed they can not be extorted, its also implied Imu knew of Rocks.
His journey starts in Mariejois because he thought that by kidnapping Kings(btw, did those random kings deserved to be kidnapped?) he would get Imu to give up his position lmao. That isn't calculated or well thought out, or maybe he's just a retard.
then the Gorosei alone req Rocks death from Harald why is that after what a decade or so now & then they doubled down and wiped his entire existence from getting out... but yeah he just wants to be king cause hes evil and everyone should serve him oh yeah this is the same guy that openly stated if anyone in the crew doesnt want to follow him then they can leave.... yeah such an evil dictator rocks is..
.
The Gorosei wiping out a threat to their power does not make that threat a good thing. Again, you can LITERALLY, say the same thing about Doffy.
Or any of the prisoners from Impel down level 6, who were also to be erased. We know for a fact that Croocdile, etc are completely evil people, despite the government wanting to erase them from history. Him being okay with disloyal people leaving his crew does not mean he doesn't intend to rule over them. What do you think "King of the world" means lol?
your objectively case for rocks being evil is literally caus he destroyed towns and declared to the current ruler that hell be back then shared with harald to be partners and take down the holy land and the wg and rule together...
but why erase him from history, if hes erased from history than there isnt nay propaganda to be shared...
the narrator never once called him evil...
yawn.
1. Yeah, my objective case for him being evil is that he goes around destroying towns, messing up countries etc. If someone did that irl, we would obviously all agree they are evil.
2. The government erased him from history to avoid copycats I guess? All that's relevant is that we don't even know what propaganda would be used against Rocks. There's no reason to assume the reader would know about any propaganda about Rocks.
3. Yeah, the narrator doesn't need to call him "evil" because that would be moralizing. We can judge from the actions that he's describing, the author objectively sees him as evil..