Powers & Abilities Debunking Literally Every Argument Against Ryokugyu’s Black Blade UPDATE: Remembering The Fallen

Does Ryokugyu Have A Black Blade?


  • Total voters
    64
Aint no way you hit my blud with the "nah actually its not wrong" while he is already fighting for his life
Like I said I haven't really been following the discussion but if we are not being disingenous for agenda the notion that Hachinosu Garp is Prime Garp is not a serious argument given the character quite literally said so himself.
That said Oda is absolutely awful at power scaling. Mofo always moves on what exactly he's trying to hype in the moment hence the pletora of inconsitencies in his writing.
 
Like I said I haven't really been following the discussion but if we are not being disingenous for agenda the notion that Hachinosu Garp is Prime Garp is not a serious argument given the character quite literally said so himself.
That said Oda is absolutely awful at power scaling. Mofo always moves on what exactly he's trying to hype in the moment hence the pletora of inconsitencies in his writing.
Fenaker was using a text of a VC for his agenda, I countered saying that then we had a great Aokiji uspcale, because the same VCs were saying that Garp's strength was the same as the one used against Roger.
Fenaker then said that according to you the translation of that VC was wrong.
 
Like I said I haven't really been following the discussion but if we are not being disingenous for agenda the notion that Hachinosu Garp is Prime Garp is not a serious argument given the character quite literally said so himself.
That said Oda is absolutely awful at power scaling. Mofo always moves on what exactly he's trying to hype in the moment hence the pletora of inconsitencies in his writing.
Nah i agree about the TL i just found it funny

I dont even know what myself what they yapping about.
 
I guess i saw every single Anti Greenbull argument here.

- "Greenbull don't have a kokuto"
- "Greenbull's sword is white"
- "Greenbull's sword is black because of the sheath"
- "Greenbull's sword is wooden"
- "Greenbull coated his sword with CoA"
- "Oda drew it black by mistake"
- "Greenbull's sword is white in the anime"
- "There are no cataloging or character line comproving Greenbull's blade is a kokuto"
- "Nobody in Wano recognized Greenbull's sword as a kokuto"
- "Greenbull stole that blade"
- "Greenbull ain't capable to forge a kokuto"
- "Greenbull is a DF user, he ain't a swordsman"
- "Greenbull never showed swordsmanship skills"
- "Oda didn't even gave Shanks/Roger/Xebec a kokuto, no way he's giving it to Greenbull"
- "Greenbull fights dirty"
- "Greenbull soloed King and Queen cause they were nerfed"
- "King and Queen were using invisible handcuffs"
- "Greenbull couldn't pierce and King"
- "Greenbull got wi fi diffed by Shanks, he ain't strong enough"
- "Greenbull was struggling to fight YC7 Morley"
- "Greenbull never put Fujitora on bandages, it was the Revs"
- "Greenbull used hostages to capture Weevil"
- "Greenbull didn't defeat Weevil, since there was no plants on Sphinx Island, and Weevil wasn't drained by Greenbull since he was still able to yell for his mother"

It's interresting to analyse all these copium arguments because all of them comes from the perspective of Greenbull not being strong enough to perfrom such feats, as he were some kind of the underdog of top tiers.

The funny thing is, if we need the "definitive proof" to confirm anything
.....

How does Shanks fairly beat Loki?
How does Ryuma killed the former Niddhog?
How does Mihawk defeated an Admiral?

I mean, if you're to downplay a character, you must be consistent with your slander....
 
I guess i saw every single Anti Greenbull argument here.

- "Greenbull don't have a kokuto"
- "Greenbull's sword is white"
- "Greenbull's sword is black because of the sheath"
- "Greenbull's sword is wooden"
- "Greenbull coated his sword with CoA"
- "Oda drew it black by mistake"
- "Greenbull's sword is white in the anime"
- "There are no cataloging or character line comproving Greenbull's blade is a kokuto"
- "Nobody in Wano recognized Greenbull's sword as a kokuto"
- "Greenbull stole that blade"
- "Greenbull ain't capable to forge a kokuto"
- "Greenbull is a DF user, he ain't a swordsman"
- "Greenbull never showed swordsmanship skills"
- "Oda didn't even gave Shanks/Roger/Xebec a kokuto, no way he's giving it to Greenbull"
- "Greenbull fights dirty"
- "Greenbull soloed King and Queen cause they were nerfed"
- "King and Queen were using invisible handcuffs"
- "Greenbull couldn't pierce and King"
- "Greenbull got wi fi diffed by Shanks, he ain't strong enough"
- "Greenbull was struggling to fight YC7 Morley"
- "Greenbull never put Fujitora on bandages, it was the Revs"
- "Greenbull used hostages to capture Weevil"
- "Greenbull didn't defeat Weevil, since there was no plants on Sphinx Island, and Weevil wasn't drained by Greenbull since he was still able to yell for his mother"

It's interresting to analyse all these copium arguments because all of them comes from the perspective of Greenbull not being strong enough to perfrom such feats, as he were some kind of the underdog of top tiers.

The funny thing is, if we need the "definitive proof" to confirm anything
.....

How does Shanks fairly beat Loki?
How does Ryuma killed the former Niddhog?
How does Mihawk defeated an Admiral?

I mean, if you're to downplay a character, you must be consistent with your slander....
:josad: What you even say to that
 
I guess i saw every single Anti Greenbull argument here.

- "Greenbull don't have a kokuto"
- "Greenbull's sword is white"
- "Greenbull's sword is black because of the sheath"
- "Greenbull's sword is wooden"
- "Greenbull coated his sword with CoA"
- "Oda drew it black by mistake"
- "Greenbull's sword is white in the anime"
- "There are no cataloging or character line comproving Greenbull's blade is a kokuto"
- "Nobody in Wano recognized Greenbull's sword as a kokuto"
- "Greenbull stole that blade"
- "Greenbull ain't capable to forge a kokuto"
- "Greenbull is a DF user, he ain't a swordsman"
- "Greenbull never showed swordsmanship skills"
- "Oda didn't even gave Shanks/Roger/Xebec a kokuto, no way he's giving it to Greenbull"
- "Greenbull fights dirty"
- "Greenbull soloed King and Queen cause they were nerfed"
- "King and Queen were using invisible handcuffs"
- "Greenbull couldn't pierce and King"
- "Greenbull got wi fi diffed by Shanks, he ain't strong enough"
- "Greenbull was struggling to fight YC7 Morley"
- "Greenbull never put Fujitora on bandages, it was the Revs"
- "Greenbull used hostages to capture Weevil"
- "Greenbull didn't defeat Weevil, since there was no plants on Sphinx Island, and Weevil wasn't drained by Greenbull since he was still able to yell for his mother"

It's interresting to analyse all these copium arguments because all of them comes from the perspective of Greenbull not being strong enough to perfrom such feats, as he were some kind of the underdog of top tiers.

The funny thing is, if we need the "definitive proof" to confirm anything
.....

How does Shanks fairly beat Loki?
How does Ryuma killed the former Niddhog?
How does Mihawk defeated an Admiral?

I mean, if you're to downplay a character, you must be consistent with your slander....
Beautiful mountain of cope
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
I guess i saw every single Anti Greenbull argument here.

- "Greenbull don't have a kokuto"
- "Greenbull's sword is white"
- "Greenbull's sword is black because of the sheath"
- "Greenbull's sword is wooden"
- "Greenbull coated his sword with CoA"
- "Oda drew it black by mistake"
- "Greenbull's sword is white in the anime"
- "There are no cataloging or character line comproving Greenbull's blade is a kokuto"
- "Nobody in Wano recognized Greenbull's sword as a kokuto"
- "Greenbull stole that blade"
- "Greenbull ain't capable to forge a kokuto"
- "Greenbull is a DF user, he ain't a swordsman"
- "Greenbull never showed swordsmanship skills"
- "Oda didn't even gave Shanks/Roger/Xebec a kokuto, no way he's giving it to Greenbull"
- "Greenbull fights dirty"
- "Greenbull soloed King and Queen cause they were nerfed"
- "King and Queen were using invisible handcuffs"
- "Greenbull couldn't pierce and King"
- "Greenbull got wi fi diffed by Shanks, he ain't strong enough"
- "Greenbull was struggling to fight YC7 Morley"
- "Greenbull never put Fujitora on bandages, it was the Revs"
- "Greenbull used hostages to capture Weevil"
- "Greenbull didn't defeat Weevil, since there was no plants on Sphinx Island, and Weevil wasn't drained by Greenbull since he was still able to yell for his mother"

It's interresting to analyse all these copium arguments because all of them comes from the perspective of Greenbull not being strong enough to perfrom such feats, as he were some kind of the underdog of top tiers.

The funny thing is, if we need the "definitive proof" to confirm anything
.....

How does Shanks fairly beat Loki?
How does Ryuma killed the former Niddhog?
How does Mihawk defeated an Admiral?

I mean, if you're to downplay a character, you must be consistent with your slander....
How is any of that the same.

Greenbull having a BB isnt a theory spoken about people are here saying its confirmed when it isnt.

The same reason (shown black) was why we had raisin has a black blade thread too.

The other 2 bbs outright got shown and stated to be as such.


Easy

Cause of his haki
Cause of his haki
And cause of his haki
 
The same reason (shown black) was why we had raisin has a black blade thread too.
Let's be serious here: if It was the same situation, we wouldn't have had this discussion, much less for years.

Raisin's balde was shown black because he was holding It, actively using it in combat and he was hit in the middle of it and let go the blade, which remained black since It had been in his hand and coated in haki 1 millisecond before.

Aramaki's blade was shown twice, with Ryokugyu not even touching It and one time when he was simply walking.
Not only that, but in the official coloring things like blood (or haki?) used on his wood-like fingers were removed to show his true colours... but the blade ramained black.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Let's be serious here: if It was the same situation, we wouldn't have had this discussion, much less for years.

Raisin's balde was shown black because he was holding It, actively using it in combat and he was hit in the middle of it and let go the blade, which remained black since It had been in his hand and coated in haki 1 millisecond before.

Aramaki's blade was shown twice, with Ryokugyu not even touching It and one time when he was simply walking.
Not only that, but in the official coloring things like blood (or haki?) used on his wood-like fingers were removed to show his true colours... but the blade ramained black.
Of course its the same situation.
 
Its literally the same
Not touching it means nothing weve seen broken weapons be haki clad
Again, It's literally not and I have explained why.

- Ryo wasn't using It (opposite of Raisin);
- Ryo was seen walking around with hands in pocket and the sword was still black (again, opposite to Raisin infusing haki into the balde, thouching It):




- in VC, where haki/blood was removed from Ryo's fingers (as usual: It's done to show the true colours of the characters), the sword was still black.

Manga:



VC:


Cope with whatever you like, not with Raisin though.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Again, It's literally not and I have explained why.

- Ryo wasn't using It (opposite of Raisin);
- Ryo was seen walking around with hands in pocket and the sword was still black (again, opposite to Raisin infusing haki into the balde, thouching It):




- in VC, where haki/blood was removed from Ryo's fingers (as usual: It's done to show the true colours of the characters), the sword was still black.

Manga:



VC:


Cope with whatever you like, not with Raisin though.
Youre the only one coping.
The only confirmed black blades are shown and stated to be such and are with people zoro related.

Greenbull doesnt fit any of this.
 
Top