Nah

Alliances often struggle when it comes to passing policies without making leeway or appeasement for all parties involved which ends up diluting the policies and bills.


Policies need time to show results. Better to have one party govern for a term or two and then vote another if things aren't going well.


Infact, I would have preferred two terms of Trump or Biden back to back than Trump - Biden - Trump
Ideas are ideas wether they're leeway or trying to appease the other parties in the alliance.

Policies needing time to show result is a different subject than "one party > alliances".
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
Lately Japanese and French ships passed, so I doubt Pakistan will make a lot of money if they consider that move lol

Check the picture I linked in my first post, Hormuz has no international waters since its so narrow, in fact it has an overlap between Oman and Iran's water. Still, international law is clear that ships should be able to transit for free.
Now, how willing will Iran be to abide by International law on maritime trade after the war? I don't know, but I doubt they'd be willing to jump back right in.

And as long as other countries are unwilling to open the strait by force, it seems likely that Iran will go forward to profit from Hormuz. Like I said, for other countries paying the extra dollar may be seen as the best option going forward since there is no going back.
UNCLOS is clear about the passage


Here I quote it

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), oil tankers enjoy the right of innocent passage, which allows them to pass through a country’s 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, provided their passage doesn't affect peace, order and security of the coastal state.

If the territorial waters are part of a strait used for international navigation (like the Strait of Hormuz), the stricter "transit passage" right applies, which cannot be suspended by the coastal state, allowing tankers to move freely.


Iran has no authority whatsoever to restrict Oil tankers movements. Free transit passage is provided by the international law.

Last week increase in traffic was observed which is good sign but this war isn't over because Iran is restricting vessels of US and it's allies which US won't accept at all.

And, US won't simply let Iran control Hormuz like this.

Best way out is to reach to terms and use Hormuz to get deal done.

Even UK led collaboration has pitched military efforts to secure safe passage if diplomatic and political efforts don't work.
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
Ideas are ideas wether they're leeway or trying to appease the other parties in the alliance.

Policies needing time to show result is a different subject than "one party > alliances".
It's not different.

Parties form government to govern and to govern they need to pass bills and policies.

One party with clear majority gets it done

A coalition is weak governance which requires dilution of bills to appease entire coalition parties/alliances just to pass
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
And, If Iran won't open the Hormuz then US would escalate the war.

Even Gulf might join US directly.

There's absolutely no way US would let Iran control Hormuz and restrict passage.

Trump is holding back. US is holding back. Let it this way and getting deal done by using Hormuz as levearge during negotiation is better way out for Iran.
 

CoC: Color of Clowns

Get French With It, Cut the Cheese
Primary Signs of the Antichrist

Denial of Jesus Christ: The Antichrist denies that Jesus is the Christ, promoting a counterfeit theology.

The "Man of Lawlessness": He will be lawless, opposing God's commandments and establishing himself as the ultimate authority.

Claiming Divinity: He will exalt himself above every object of worship, sitting in the temple of God and proclaiming himself to be God.

Global Political Leader: He will rise to power in a time of instability, likely ruling a global system that demands loyalty (the "mark" of the beast) to buy or sell.

Performs False Miracles: Enabled by Satan, he will perform signs and lying wonders, even calling fire down from heaven to deceive people.

The "Abomination of Desolation": He will breach a peace treaty halfway through his reign, stopping sacrifices and desecrating the temple.

"Counterfeit Resurrection": Many believe the Antichrist will appear to survive a fatal wound, mimicking Christ's resurrection to gain worship



That also works for the "assassination attempt" too

I don't know why maga don't see these signs lol. Matches frighteningly well
It matches up all too well. People can see it as hypocritical, because I hate religion, but the people I try to listen to are those who combine a spiritual truth with factual evidence and reason. Tesla types. I like spirituality, i hate most religions because they're belief based and hate facts and truth.

This is why I love Christ, Mary, Buddha, Hathor. These are real beings that have fought for our freedom and souls. The reason people keep coming back to them is because they resonate with that truth. And it surpasses all the lies we've been fed, but the distortion is so heavy that people have a hard time fighting through it.

Feel free to mock me for saying this because it's a lot, but i've become convinced there is a time travel element to this.

A lot of scientists believe the time is not fundamental to reality. We already see through black holes that time can be manipulated. This is proven.

This opens up a large can of worms.

How many prophecies were warnings from people in the future, and how many of them were designed to create a future?

We always focused on time travel as being somebody showing up in another timeline.

But, if you really want to alter the past, what is the easiest way to do so? Communication. A large scale time traveling presence would be easy to detect and deal with. Small groups? Splinter groups from an advanced civilization in the future tying to come back and dominate the past?

Why did the u s government ban entire branches of physics from being studied after the manhattan project? Were nukes really the end all?

If we know that these branches of physics dive into black hole technology, and we know that black holes can alter time...

Well, add two plus two. What does it equal?

Why did they ban these fields of physics? Because this is a time war.

Imagine you are a civilization, an empire that has actually manufactured functional high level time travel technology. Like our empires, in order to continue to grow, you need to be able to find more people to destroy invade and steal from.

What happens when you run out of people around you to steal from? What happens when you run out of planets around you? What happens when you mine all of that life, rape it and leave behind nothing but ash and dust?

Where would you go?

To another time.

So this is my theory.

It's an offshoot of the dark forest theory. Why do we not see other planets showcase advanced life?

They're hiding from something. A predator that doesn't work in one direction. A predator that can move in both.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/pentagon-ufo-occult-rituals-jack-parsons-1786089

The modern UFO waves occurred after Parsons and Crowley started collabing and doing crazy shit.

I think this explains everything. This is this advanced technology is very powerful, but because of that, its energy signatures are unmistakable.

Predatory civilizations that are capable of time travel are constantly trying to find civilizations with advanced resources that they can enslave and consume.

Once they detect advanced technologies, energy signatures, they immediately descend to harvest. Since they play the long game, these harvests can take a very long time.

So at some point, Earth people experimenting with advanced technology created energy signals that attracted incredibly advanced predatory species to come after us. Life is incredibly valuable. Look at how much rich people value slaves.

What makes earth valuable is life itself.

So the spiritual types that are anti science are anti science, because they realize that once you start experimenting this stuff, you'll attract predatory civilizations. Tolkein was of this mindset.

And the pro science types are like, are you fucking retarded? We need to fight back against these things, why are you hiding?

Every time i've heard about christians in the government's military, trying to cover up demons and UFO shit, I'm like, bro, if you think the demons are ufos and you hate demons, why are you covering it up.

Evolution is supposed to happen slowly for a reason. You give a child fire what happens? You give an underdeveloped civilization that has bad ethics nukes, guess what happens?

Our entire history is actually a history of advanced beings fighting over our planet as territory, while falsely claiming to be gods. Most rule us, and a happy few try to liberate us.

Time travelers have obviously tried very hard to make it clear that trump is either the antichrist or very much so aligned with that kind of evil.

Since time is non local, time is nonfundamental to the universe... they can still lose in the future. Hence why they're so obsessed with us.

We're looking at this war on a linear level.

This is an ancient war fought across time.

The bad guys need to restrain access to time travel, because they don't want people showing up in their time to fuck things up the way they show up to invade everyone else.

The story is so ridiculous, most people would never believe it. But all the evidence is there.

This is not a holy war.

This is a time war, hiding behind religions designed to make more slaves.

Edit: I can't find it quickly, there used to be some videos, discussing the government trying to steal from other dimensions and timelines. They might have taken them down. I remember this explicitly because while watching it, I was like "holy shit, we are run by insane people. You're bitching about people stealing from the grocery store, and you're trying to steal from other dimensions???"

One thing I forgot to add, that's very important, is that this evil breakaway civilization ruling us has a shit ton of sensory and surveillance throughout this world and others.

This is why I don't give a fucking shit about privacy and security messages anymore.. I'm like, bro, there are so many fuckers spying on us. Saying no, please don't spy on me is not going to make them stop. I learned that from their child victims.

Tesla's the best, man. I love that dude. Fun with pyramids!
 
Last edited:
AI? Could be

But imo it has more to do with people seeing everything from conspiracy lens and lacking discernment
Careful.. It's a continuum. Conspiracy theorism is something people do not go volontarilly to. Discernment is a learned skill. I know from experience that most people HERE lack that exact same discernment as conspiracy theorists.

There is not the conspi on one side and us on the other, it's a scale. Usually from complete desilusion to something that is trying to fight it to the maximum and have enough knowledge to know the content of reality to the best possible aspect possible at our current state of knowledge (I would say scientist with philosophical, sociological, materialist, political and natural scientific knowledge, which would be very very VERY FEW people).

People usually think they are not delusional, precisely because these people they never had to face desilusion or a harcore politicization, but usually people like you guyz are time bombs. Since you never created real protection, you don't know what it takes to stop yourself from going full delu.

I, for ex, never make the assumption that I'm completely immune to the impact of my biases or reactionnary ideas or conspirationism. That would be highly unwise and dangerous. This is why I keep telling you to reflect on your positionning. Because you might think you are not delusionnal, but from my point of view, who walked the path to fight the ideas you are defending in my own mind, I see you guyz as delusionnal, or rather, depoliticized.

You could say "well, of course, because you are the delusionnal one".. yes maybe. But how do you prove that? And how do you explained that I believed what you know once and I do not anymore because of factual evidences?

This doesn't apply to you specifically. It's just something to think about when you think conspirationist are more delu that you are.
 
Last edited:
Then there's nothing to discuss
As you don't believe people can have different opinions than you
You don't get it. There are things in politics people can have different opinions on. But these usually are questions on which we do not have a definitive answer.

For example, what is the best way to establish a socialist society if we can ? I could tell you that it is communism, or anarchism, but do I have a definite answer, am I certain that it is right? No. Simply because it has never REALLY been tested without society fighting it. These are question we can have debate on because we just don't know for certain or at least not on a 100% level.

But most of the things, we actually have definitive and materialist and politically ethical but also logical answer too. The answer to these questions are accessible to everyone, but biases, political views of the world and material interests linked to material condition of existence will prevent most from seeking these answer.

Let me tell you a new secret about me :

When I was STILL on the right spectrum or at least the center right. The MOMENT when something clicked for me (I won't tell you what) and I understood that despite getting out of conspiracy theorism, I was still under the influences of my biases EVEN THO I was trying to learn about critical thinking... well on this moment a road opened in my mind and I knew EXACTLY where I would end up:

A revolutionnary.

Yup, I was not even a leftist yet, not even a sos dem, not even politicized on everything I have been vomiting for the last 5 years here. Absolutely no political leftist knowledge. But I was angry and I saw the amount of knowledge in front of me for the first time without any biases, with an opened mind.

I'm not a real revolutionnary yet, not even a proper activist. Not politicized or even radical enough or physical engaged enough to be like that yet. But I have no more biases in front of the knowledge or the potential of the rethoric I can or know I should be careful about. And I still know where I will end up.

Politicizing doesn't mean changing opinion. It means understanding why what you knew about the world is wrong or inexact. Sometimes, you may know almost everything, but there is ONE info that prevents you from completely opening your mind to said knowledge and make you look at it backward.. until something click. I you suddenly radicalize or politicize.

And if you are not careful, or too lazy to protect yourself from the influences of your biases.. you might go backward. Toward the far right.
 
You don't get it. There are things in politics people can have different opinions on. But these usually are questions on which we do not have a definitive answer.

For example, what is the best way to establish a socialist society if we can ?
Same old shit
"Only my political position is valid"

When I was STILL on the right spectrum or at least the center right. The MOMENT when something clicked for me (I won't tell you what) and I understood that despite getting out of conspiracy theorism, I was still under the influences of my biases EVEN THO I was trying to learn about critical thinking... well on this moment a road opened in my mind and I knew EXACTLY where I would end up:

A revolutionnary.

Yup, I was not even a leftist yet, not even a sos dem, not even politicized on everything I have been vomiting for the last 5 years here. Absolutely no political leftist knowledge. But I was angry and I saw the amount of knowledge in front of me for the first time without any biases, with an opened mind.

I'm not a real revolutionnary yet, not even a proper activist. Not politicized or even radical enough or physical engaged enough to be like that yet. But I have no more biases in front of the knowledge or the potential of the rethoric I can or know I should be careful about. And I still know where I will end up.
And you still don't have a job lol
 
@Mathias my point is that as a result of the Trauma of the Vietnam war

A lot of Americans developed the idea that Sanctions and Drones and other "indirect" ways to hurt other countries are "more moral" , even though the results are actually more brutal, with Bill Clinton killing more Iraqi Civilians than Either the two Bushes for example (and the whole Sudanese Pharmacy factory thing)

Had Clinton just Invaded Iraq when Saddam started violating treaties instead of this Pacifist passive aggressive shit it actually might have had a far better result than kicking the can down the line

This "Pacifist" Culture where Ground Invasions are the Ultimate Evil and worse for civilians is pretty much just cowardly out of sight out of mind stuff rather than an actual concern for Civilians , it's more based on feels rather than facts

Same for people who feel more comfortable starving Russians with Sanctions than to actually send NATO troops against them(many of them even blame Zelensky for the war btw)
 
Having a job is a means of reaching certain goals

Better than to waste my time online talking about underage Rabbits joining Pirate Crews
So the question "do you have a job yet?" is not that great and the better question would rather be "Did you reach any of your life goals yet?" or even better : "do you managed to find happyness?"

Perhaps you would see your life and the world differently throught a non capitalistic and productive lens.

Wouldn't you agree?

:yodaswag:
 

Apollo

The Sol King
UNCLOS is clear about the passage


Here I quote it

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), oil tankers enjoy the right of innocent passage, which allows them to pass through a country’s 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, provided their passage doesn't affect peace, order and security of the coastal state.

If the territorial waters are part of a strait used for international navigation (like the Strait of Hormuz), the stricter "transit passage" right applies, which cannot be suspended by the coastal state, allowing tankers to move freely.


Iran has no authority whatsoever to restrict Oil tankers movements. Free transit passage is provided by the international law.

Last week increase in traffic was observed which is good sign but this war isn't over because Iran is restricting vessels of US and it's allies which US won't accept at all.

And, US won't simply let Iran control Hormuz like this.

Best way out is to reach to terms and use Hormuz to get deal done.

Even UK led collaboration has pitched military efforts to secure safe passage if diplomatic and political efforts don't work.
I am not disputing what international law says. Its just a question of whether Iran will go back to abiding by this law or not.

This war escalated a lot already. Strikes happened on petrochemicals, energy stations, bridges, datacenters...etc. I doubt things will go back to how they were pre-war.

And, If Iran won't open the Hormuz then US would escalate the war.

Even Gulf might join US directly.

There's absolutely no way US would let Iran control Hormuz and restrict passage.

Trump is holding back. US is holding back. Let it this way and getting deal done by using Hormuz as levearge during negotiation is better way out for Iran.
No such thing as holding back lol, this is not an anime fight. Trump won't let his allies take losses in the billions due to holding back.
The USA simply cannot launch operations like the 2003 invasion of Iraq as it has its military spread across the globe. Some would say it already cannibalized too much of its strength in other theaters like Europe or the Pacific to fight Iran. Trump is already pushing the limits with sending a third carrier to CENTCOM.

Most of our stealth cruise missiles are going to the Middle East:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...k-of-stealthy-long-range-missile-for-iran-war
The next steps in the US military campaign against Iran will commit nearly its entire inventory of stealthy JASSM-ER cruise missiles, drawing them from stockpiles devoted to other regions.
After the moves, only about 425 JASSM-ER out of a prewar inventory of 2,300 will remain available for the rest of the globe.
Along with the shorter-range JASSM — which has a range of about 250 miles, about two-thirds of US stockpiles have been committed to the Iran war, the person said.
THAAD Air Defenses pulled away from South Korea:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...iles-thaad-south-korea-middle-east-seoul-iran

850 Tomahawks fired in the first four weeks, global stockpile is around 3000-4000. Japan recently was told that its order of tomahawks will be delayed for 2 years.
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...arming-some-pentagon-wapo-reports-2026-03-27/

The USA is not holding back. However, Trump cannot launch mobilization like the Iraq war today, as he takes away from US military deterrence across the globe in Europe and East Asia.
 
Last edited:

Apollo

The Sol King
Also, you guys hype up the Gulf states when they aren't a good addition to the war at all. They've been bluffing about joining but they cannot do anything that Israel and America aren't doing 100x times better already.

Its like asking Chopper to help Luffy and Zoro fight Kaido.
 

Apollo

The Sol King
In other news, President Donald Trump melts down on social media and converts to Islam on Easter Sunday.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116351998782539414

Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP
 
Top