I'm not even entirely sure myself tbh
I typically stay out of all haki/ACoC discussions because they're just so silly
I feel like there's a way to counter any argument that anyone makes because Oda isn't consistent at all. Sometimes there are sounds, a lot of times there aren't
Sometimes you see trails, other times you just see it in the impact, sometimes you don't see it at all
its safer to rely on narrative clues yeah
Like, for example, visually the attack oda used this chapter looks way more similar to DJ (no plasma, no lightning, has the star shape like against judge), but i would still say it is IJ because it makes more sense in context
Mind you not to clown oda but this is also the mangaka that forgot to draw namis tatoo for example multiple times this and last arc, it was so much some nami fans believed she removed it
Like i said i just find it very funny that the same guy that are so quick to tell everyone that doesnt agree with their haki cope is a "retard" but when something that doesnt fit their headcanon, like this chapter, you hear crickets, especially when idolo was boogered with no haki at all
