Questions & Mysteries Why "so called FV" Imu is bleeding like a fodder

Why "so called FV" Imu is bleeding like a fodder

  • Virgin Imu has time limit like G5

  • It was one-time only damage while teleporting to the real world

  • Elbaf has something different that damages Imu

  • Something else


Results are only viewable after voting.
Gaban talked about God Valley because he meant demonic aura he felt there, he wasn't talking about pure power.

Giants already said Shanks's Haki is comparable to Joy Boy who hurt Imu from another island.

Until Imu knocks out Vice admirals with CoC, we don't know if it's comparable or not.
He was talking about haki. Luffy says the same thing after sensing shanks' haki in wano. Gaban says he never haki like this not even at god valley which suggest Imu's haki >> GV Haki >> Shanks's haki.

Even old sick WB matched shanks' haki.
 
He was talking about haki. Luffy says the same thing after sensing shanks' haki in wano. Gaban says he never haki like this not even at god valley which suggest Imu's haki >> GV Haki >> Shanks's haki.

Even old sick WB matched shanks' haki.
Yes it means he felt the most demonic Haki, not most powerful. He never said it's the most powerful Haki for a reason.

What did he say? "he never felt haki like this" of course, because Imu's Haki is different, it's demonic Haki.

Joy Boy's Haki > Imu's Haki, that's certain.

Imu never knocked out Vice admirals with Haki yet.
Shanks and Joy Boy did knock Vice admirals with Haki.

WB was stronger than MF version, and Shanks didn't use all of his power vs WB.

Shanks beat Loki but Imu is still struggling despite using his demonic tricks.
 
Yes it means he felt the most demonic Haki, not most powerful. He never said it's the most powerful Haki for a reason.

What did he say? "he never felt haki like this" of course, because Imu's Haki is different, it's demonic Haki.

Joy Boy's Haki > Imu's Haki, that's certain.

Imu never knocked out Vice admirals with Haki yet.
Shanks and Joy Boy did knock Vice admirals with Haki.

WB was stronger than MF version, and Shanks didn't use all of his power vs WB.

Shanks beat Loki but Imu is still struggling despite using his demonic tricks.
Loki is a hidden character. But shanks wasn't and most in OP had Old WB above shanks.

Loki dominated Hk amped harald who even in base was equal of xebec who is portrayed as strongest rival of roger.

Loki > Hk amped harald >> Base harald = Prime roger/WB >> Old WB > Shanks.
 
Just like queen did to BM. Just like fishmen did to zoro in FI arc. Weaker characters capturing stronger ones are nothing new in one piece.
Until it's proven that happened like that you have no argument. Even then that only shows Shanks's AP, he isn't going to climb to a hill and use the gravity with his extra weight to increase his attack while Loki rampaging others lmao. That's a low chance happening exactly like Queen capturing BM.
 
Shanks became an Emperor 6 years ago, that's when he defeated Loki. Not a coincidence.

It confirmed his Emperor level.
It only confirms the public thought Shanks defeated a 2.6b pirate and made him an emperor. I mean, Buggy exists.

I'm not saying that Shanks is as fraudulent as Buggy but there's clearly more to it which Oda has yet to reveal. It's like stating Luffy defeated Kaido without considering what it took to beat him.

This arc literally started with the strawhats being captured by Road who's a complete fodder.

Shanks is relative to emperors and old legends like Gaban and Rayleigh. Sure, he is strong but Loki truly shows the difference between old legends and those who're meant to hang with god tiers. Blackbeard is also an exception cuz he's gonna be a god tier as well in the final arc.
 
It only confirms the public thought Shanks defeated a 2.6b pirate and made him an emperor. I mean, Buggy exists.

I'm not saying that Shanks is as fraudulent as Buggy but there's clearly more to it which Oda has yet to reveal. It's like stating Luffy defeated Kaido without considering what it took to beat him.

This arc literally started with the strawhats being captured by Road who's a complete fodder.

Shanks is relative to emperors and old legends like Gaban and Rayleigh. Sure, he is strong but Loki truly shows the difference between old legends and those who're meant to hang with god tiers. Blackbeard is also an exception cuz he's gonna be a god tier as well in the final arc.
Wrong. Shanks is clearly above of Rayleigh. His Haki is compared to JB's, and knocked out Viceadmirals with a basic CoC, wifi-diffed an Admiral, one-shotted 3 billion Kid+Killer, Rayleigh can't do that.

Luffy getting captured has no effect in the story, it's just Oda is playing around, so he lets him go shortly after.

Loki was chained for years because Shanks was putting him under control, it has effect on the story, also controlling other giants on the same island as well. Elbaf was Shanks's territory.
 
Wrong. Shanks is clearly above of Rayleigh. His Haki is compared to JB's, and knocked out Viceadmirals with a basic CoC, wifi-diffed an Admiral, one-shotted 3 billion Kid+Killer, Rayleigh can't do that.
Dorry and Brogy stated Joyboy's robe Haki is even stronger than Shanks'. It managed to solo skysplit, when has Shanks ever shown this level of Haki?

Meanwhile, Oda compared Shanks and Rayleigh's CoC in the SBS which was about knocking 100,000 fishman pirates out.

Shanks is more comparable to Rayleigh than he is to any real god tier in this verse.

Luffy getting captured has no effect in the story, it's just Oda is playing around, so he lets him go shortly after.
We have so many instances of weaker characters capturing stronger ones in certain circumstances.
You brought up Jozu and Marco into this but did you forget who put Marco in seacuffs again?

You've seen Loki's crazy feats in this arc, especially against a god tier. Do you truly believe Shanks defeated this monster?

Loki was chained for years because Shanks was putting him under control, it has effect on the story, also controlling other giants on the same island as well.
There isn't much Loki can do when his entire body is covered in seastone chains AND cuffs.

Also, Loki literally isn't an enemy to Elbaf, he's malicious to the WG. It was "fake news" that Loki killed Harald out of malicious intent, he had no other choice. We know the truth, the people in Elbaf clearly do not.
 
Dorry and Brogy stated Joyboy's robe Haki is even stronger than Shanks'. It managed to solo skysplit, when has Shanks ever shown this level of Haki?

Meanwhile, Oda compared Shanks and Rayleigh's CoC in the SBS which was about knocking 100,000 fishman pirates out.

Shanks is more comparable to Rayleigh than he is to any real god tier in this verse.



We have so many instances of weaker characters capturing stronger ones in certain circumstances.
You brought up Jozu and Marco into this but did you forget who put Marco in seacuffs again?

You've seen Loki's crazy feats in this arc, especially against a god tier. Do you truly believe Shanks defeated this monster?



There isn't much Loki can do when his entire body is covered in seastone chains AND cuffs.

Also, Loki literally isn't an enemy to Elbaf, he's malicious to the WG. It was "fake news" that Loki killed Harald out of malicious intent, he had no other choice. We know the truth, the people in Elbaf clearly do not.
JB said he put his strongest Haki and they specifically asked question, not certainly said it is.



Oda didn't compare Shanks and Rayleigh, he gave example that if fishmen felt a stronger Haki, all of them would get knocked out, there was 100k fishmen, and all of them would get knocked out. He didn't say out of 1 million fishmen, they would both knock 100k, it was explaining that all of them are too weak, not a comparison between Shanks and Rayleigh.

Shanks's feats >>> Rayleigh's feats. There are no comparisons.

Shanks's AP can hurt Loki's defenses in order for him to capture Loki. That alone is a great feat.

Plus, Shanks showed FS superior to Loki or Imu. He is also defensively superior.
 
Wrong. Shanks is clearly above of Rayleigh. His Haki is compared to JB's, and knocked out Viceadmirals with a basic CoC, wifi-diffed an Admiral, one-shotted 3 billion Kid+Killer, Rayleigh can't do that.

Luffy getting captured has no effect in the story, it's just Oda is playing around, so he lets him go shortly after.

Loki was chained for years because Shanks was putting him under control, it has effect on the story, also controlling other giants on the same island as well. Elbaf was Shanks's territory.
Dorry and Brogy stated Joyboy's robe Haki is even stronger than Shanks'. It managed to solo skysplit, when has Shanks ever shown this level of Haki?

Meanwhile, Oda compared Shanks and Rayleigh's CoC in the SBS which was about knocking 100,000 fishman pirates out.

Shanks is more comparable to Rayleigh than he is to any real god tier in this verse.



We have so many instances of weaker characters capturing stronger ones in certain circumstances.
You brought up Jozu and Marco into this but did you forget who put Marco in seacuffs again?

You've seen Loki's crazy feats in this arc, especially against a god tier. Do you truly believe Shanks defeated this monster?



There isn't much Loki can do when his entire body is covered in seastone chains AND cuffs.

Also, Loki literally isn't an enemy to Elbaf, he's malicious to the WG. It was "fake news" that Loki killed Harald out of malicious intent, he had no other choice. We know the truth, the people in Elbaf clearly do not.
 
Top