Chapter Discussion The Brook and Gunko flashback is a textbook example of bad writing, and why it's not developing Brook as a character

Do you love Brook flashback?

  • Yes, I love shitwriting of Oda

    Votes: 11 52.4%
  • No, even if I love Brook and want to learn the truth, this is shitty writing of story

    Votes: 10 47.6%

  • Total voters
    21
#1
The Brook and Gunko flashback is a textbook example of bad writing: instead of Brook processing his own generational grief or achieving personal growth, the flashback serves as a narrative pipeline to establish Gunko as the mechanical key to stopping Imu's possession or reversing the plot conflict.

Oda is now constantly substituting plot mechanics for genuine human emotion.

The Brook and Gunko flashback perfectly exposes how the manga’s priorities have warped:

1. Flashbacks as Manuals, Not Motives

Pre-timeskip, flashbacks were used to build the soul of a character.
  • The Past: Chopper’s backstory with Hiriluk, or Brook’s original tragedy with the Rumbar Pirates, existed to explain why they think the way they do, why they hold their values, and why they are willing to die for Luffy.
  • The Present: Today, the flashback isn't there to deepen Brook’s character or give him a fresh perspective on his isolation. It is being used like an instructional manual. It exists solely to introduce Gunko, explain her specific ancient power or relationship to Imu's possession, and lay down the exact tracks for how a future plot hole will be solved.

2. The Loss of Character Agency

When a character's history is weaponized purely for plot utility, the character ceases to be an individual and becomes a tool. Instead of Brook using his 90+ years of life experience, his unique musical abilities, or his underworld soul powers to actively overcome a challenge in Elbaf, the narrative says: "Brook is relevant here only because he happens to know the living plot device (Gunko) who will do the heavy lifting."

3. Gunko is just a Piano in the Bushes

For anyone unfamiliar with the expression, it describes a clumsy, incredibly artificial plot device where an author needs a highly specific solution to a problem, so they suddenly manifest it out of thin air, acting as if it were totally natural, like a host randomly finding a fully tuned grand piano sitting perfectly hidden in a random patch of forest bushes. This flashback is basically the story of how some people randomly left a Piano in the Bushes.

So yes, this flashback is not making Brook a better character than Usopp, or even developing Brook as a character. All this just for one thing:

The crew remains sidelined as a visual gag, while a convenient plot device will solve the immediate conflict against Imu. Luffy will get his chance to push back Imu into Marijoise. The Giants of Elbaf will spend the entire arc bowing to Luffy, further cementing his "Chosen One" status while ignoring the rest of the crew completely. Usopp’s decades-long dream will be reduced to nothing.

Which is more fun, Brook will also remain the same. This is not about Brook's development.
 
Last edited:
#14
The Brook and Gunko flashback is a textbook example of bad writing: instead of Brook processing his own generational grief or achieving personal growth, the flashback serves as a narrative pipeline to establish Gunko as the mechanical key to stopping Imu's possession or reversing the plot conflict.

Oda is now constantly substituting plot mechanics for genuine human emotion.

The Brook and Gunko flashback perfectly exposes how the manga’s priorities have warped:

1. Flashbacks as Manuals, Not Motives

Pre-timeskip, flashbacks were used to build the soul of a character.
  • The Past: Chopper’s backstory with Hiriluk, or Brook’s original tragedy with the Rumbar Pirates, existed to explain why they think the way they do, why they hold their values, and why they are willing to die for Luffy.
  • The Present: Today, the flashback isn't there to deepen Brook’s character or give him a fresh perspective on his isolation. It is being used like an instructional manual. It exists solely to introduce Gunko, explain her specific ancient power or relationship to Imu's possession, and lay down the exact tracks for how a future plot hole will be solved.

2. The Loss of Character Agency

When a character's history is weaponized purely for plot utility, the character ceases to be an individual and becomes a tool. Instead of Brook using his 90+ years of life experience, his unique musical abilities, or his underworld soul powers to actively overcome a challenge in Elbaf, the narrative says: "Brook is relevant here only because he happens to know the living plot device (Gunko) who will do the heavy lifting."

3. Gunko is just a Piano in the Bushes

For anyone unfamiliar with the expression, it describes a clumsy, incredibly artificial plot device where an author needs a highly specific solution to a problem, so they suddenly manifest it out of thin air, acting as if it were totally natural, like a host randomly finding a fully tuned grand piano sitting perfectly hidden in a random patch of forest bushes. This flashback is basically the story of how some people randomly left a Piano in the Bushes.

So yes, this flashback is not making Brook a better character than Usopp, or even developing Brook as a character. All this just for one thing:

The crew remains sidelined as a visual gag, while a convenient plot device will solve the immediate conflict against Imu. Luffy will get his chance to push back Imu into Marijoise. The Giants of Elbaf will spend the entire arc bowing to Luffy, further cementing his "Chosen One" status while ignoring the rest of the crew completely. Usopp’s decades-long dream will be reduced to nothing.

Which is more fun, Brook will also remain the same. This is not about Brook's development.
The post is good (especially about the crew being sideline and loosing their agency) but it is not the right place to have a serious argument about storytelling imo.
 
#15
You're not criticizing the Flashback, you're criticizing your own headcanon about how it might turn out to be.
Doing this when it barely started shows that you're just stressed & insecure about Imu's Fate,
Planting the seeds of "Bad Writing" Cope in case Imu gets an L right after this Flashback,
I will say this, there are two routes that Oda can choice in Elbaf:

Scenario A: The Hard Reset (The Failure & Second Timeskip) This is the path of a truly great writer who prioritizes narrative integrity over rushed pacing.
The Reality Check: The Straw Hats realize they are fundamentally unprepared for the raw, reality-warping scale of Imu, the Five Elders, and Blackbeard. They fail spectacularly in Elbaf.
The Narrative Fix: A second, brief timeskip or a narrative separation would force the crew out of the background. They would be forced to develop their own Haki, awaken their abilities, and catch up to Luffy so they can stand beside him as equals, not as luggage. The Verdict: If Oda does this, it proves he still cares about the "Pirate Crew Adventure" and is willing to fix his structural errors.

Scenario B: The Status Quo (The Plot Device & Nika Hype) This is, unfortunately, the much more likely scenario based on Oda’s post-timeskip track record.
Crew, who will become passengers of Pirate King, not wings: The crew remains sidelined as visual gags, while a convenient plot device(gunko) to solve the immediate conflict with Imu.
The Nika Worship Luffy "Chosen One" status will finally be established, while ignoring the rest of the crew completely. No one else would ever mean anything, Zoro and Sanji will remain as passengers of the Pirate King. The gap between the chosen one and the rest of the crew will be too large.

The Verdict: If the main character becomes so overwhelmingly powerful that he can single-handedly defeat the literal god-emperor of the world while his crew watches from the sidelines, the story ceases to be a pirate adventure. It becomes a standard, hollow power fantasy where the stakes are completely dead.
 
#16
I will say this, there are two routes that Oda can choice in Elbaf:

Scenario A: The Hard Reset (The Failure & Second Timeskip) This is the path of a truly great writer who prioritizes narrative integrity over rushed pacing.
The Reality Check: The Straw Hats realize they are fundamentally unprepared for the raw, reality-warping scale of Imu, the Five Elders, and Blackbeard. They fail spectacularly in Elbaf.
The Narrative Fix: A second, brief timeskip or a narrative separation would force the crew out of the background. They would be forced to develop their own Haki, awaken their abilities, and catch up to Luffy so they can stand beside him as equals, not as luggage. The Verdict: If Oda does this, it proves he still cares about the "Pirate Crew Adventure" and is willing to fix his structural errors.

Scenario B: The Status Quo (The Plot Device & Nika Hype) This is, unfortunately, the much more likely scenario based on Oda’s post-timeskip track record.
Crew, who will become passengers of Pirate King, not wings: The crew remains sidelined as visual gags, while a convenient plot device(gunko) to solve the immediate conflict with Imu.
The Nika Worship Luffy "Chosen One" status will finally be established, while ignoring the rest of the crew completely. No one else would ever mean anything, Zoro and Sanji will remain as passengers of the Pirate King. The gap between the chosen one and the rest of the crew will be too large.

The Verdict: If the main character becomes so overwhelmingly powerful that he can single-handedly defeat the literal god-emperor of the world while his crew watches from the sidelines, the story ceases to be a pirate adventure. It becomes a standard, hollow power fantasy where the stakes are completely dead.
First of all, you're not complaining about Final Saga or Villain this & Hero that, you're complaining about Brook Flashback, and that's what I'm against, you're not criticizing how Oda is gonna deal with Imu, you're using your fear of seeing such Character you liked ruined to say that Brook's Story is Bad Writing & it serves nothing for his Character Development, and that's clear insecurity, not justifiable at all,

You know why? Because this Plot Device thing you're talking about has always existed in One Piece, and I literally mentioned before during Egghead Arc how all the problems were solved without SHs, didn't Oda make Stussy deal with CP-0? Didn't Oda make Giant Pirate deal with Buster Call? Didn't Oda make Bonney deal with Pacifista? Didn't Oda make Robot deal with Gorosei? Kizaru's regret taking over? ... etc

But did you hear anyone use this to shit on Kuma Flashback?
Why didn't you make this Thread when Imu arrived through Gunko, it's no different than now, We also got a Flashback starting right after Imu attacked Elbaph & commanded two super henchmen, and right after Gunko showed some resistance to Imu's Control, why didn't you use same argument to shit on Xebec's Story? Harald's Story? Loki's Story?

Your issue isn't with Plot Devices or Flashbacks or SHs ... etc
You're just hiding your disappointment that Imu didn't deliver his Judgment as swiftly as you hoped for, and with each passing Chapter, it starts to look more like it's Imu who's trying to survive, not Elbpah,

It's not Luffy who is too Strong, it's Imu who isn't as Strong as you hoped him to be, or at least doesn't execute his plans the way you expected from someone of his caliber.
 
#17
First of all, you're not complaining about Final Saga or Villain this & Hero that, you're complaining about Brook Flashback, and that's what I'm against, you're not criticizing how Oda is gonna deal with Imu, you're using your fear of seeing such Character you liked ruined to say that Brook's Story is Bad Writing & it serves nothing for his Character Development, and that's clear insecurity, not justifiable at all,

You know why? Because this Plot Device thing you're talking about has always existed in One Piece, and I literally mentioned before during Egghead Arc how all the problems were solved without SHs, didn't Oda make Stussy deal with CP-0? Didn't Oda make Giant Pirate deal with Buster Call? Didn't Oda make Bonney deal with Pacifista? Didn't Oda make Robot deal with Gorosei? Kizaru's regret taking over? ... etc

But did you hear anyone use this to shit on Kuma Flashback?
Why didn't you make this Thread when Imu arrived through Gunko, it's no different than now, We also got a Flashback starting right after Imu attacked Elbaph & commanded two super henchmen, and right after Gunko showed some resistance to Imu's Control, why didn't you use same argument to shit on Xebec's Story? Harald's Story? Loki's Story?

Your issue isn't with Plot Devices or Flashbacks or SHs ... etc
You're just hiding your disappointment that Imu didn't deliver his Judgment as swiftly as you hoped for, and with each passing Chapter, it starts to look more like it's Imu who's trying to survive, not Elbpah,

It's not Luffy who is too Strong, it's Imu who isn't as Strong as you hoped him to be, or at least doesn't execute his plans the way you expected from someone of his caliber.
No, didn't you see how Imu neg diffed all SH? If Luffy will be able stand on his ground, that will show how superior he became in comparison of crew. I'm not thinking as some WG fun, I'm not WG fan, I'm One Piece fan, but I can see when the story turns into shit. Brook flashback timing is exactly what I didn't want to see right now. This is Piano in the Bushes, nothing more.

Also, why do I even care to continue reading this story, when the main villain from Void Century flashback will be downplayed in this arc. I don't care about power lvls at all. It's you who is reading story for just some stupid agenda, without even seeing the story overall.
 
Top