Speculations Demonstrate a higher understanding of the story

#1
Show me you can make a deep analysis that makes perfect sense OR forfeit the idea that you can make sense at all.

I'll demonstrate three right now.

1. Logia awakenings use the same traditional rules that other awakenings do. They cause the abilities to affect things other than the user's own body.

2. Loki is the embodiment of a War God, he won't follow Harald's pacifist ways.

3. Destroying the Red Line would mean animal nurseries and migratory routes are devastated.

Supporting evidence: Doflamingo explained the rules of awakenings and he included that the abilities begin to affect things other than the user's body, and a War God usually has extreme convictions of violence rather than half-hearted dreams of peace. The Red Line is the largest landmass on the planet, there are countless animals forming nurseries and migratory routes on it.

The stuff I just said is indisputable. There's no disputing it, it's practically facts.

Note: I challenge you, try to make a deep analysis. However, if anything you say can be disputed, then it's not a real analysis at all. It needs to be rock-solid or it shouldn't even be considered a proper idea. You need to be able to defend the idea. If it becomes indefensible or open to question, then it's not good enough.
 
Last edited:

Yoho

I'm Quite Dandy
#2
What you just represented isn't an analysis its just your opinions some i agree with some i don't and analysis is a detailed examination of something be it a character, arc, ability or what have you

Lemme give you a quick analysis just as an example i'll use best girl Rebecca

If I where to analyze her as a character I'd first break down her back story and how it made her who she is today I'd break down her abilities and why I'd argue she's one of the best observation haki users and I'd talk about the good and the bad and even her potential in the story be it characterization wise or ability wise

You can't just throw together a bunch of opinions and call it an analysis

Also not all awakenings work the same Zoans don't affect the environment at all Luffy so far has been rhe only one shown to do so and he's an outlier
 
#6
Show me you can make a deep analysis that makes perfect sense OR forfeit the idea that you can make sense at all.

I'll demonstrate three right now.

1. Logia awakenings use the same traditional rules that other awakenings do. They cause the abilities to affect things other than the user's own body.

2. Loki is the embodiment of a War God, he won't follow Harald's pacifist ways.

3. Destroying the Red Line would mean animal nurseries and migratory routes are devastated.

Supporting evidence: Doflamingo explained the rules of awakenings and he included that the abilities begin to affect things other than the user's body, and a War God usually has extreme convictions of violence rather than half-hearted dreams of peace. The Red Line is the largest landmass on the planet, there are countless animals forming nurseries and migratory routes on it.

The stuff I just said is indisputable. There's no disputing it, it's practically facts.

Note: I challenge you, try to make a deep analysis. However, if anything you say can be disputed, then it's not a real analysis at all. It needs to be rock-solid or it shouldn't even be considered a proper idea. You need to be able to defend the idea. If it becomes indefensible or open to question, then it's not good enough.
1. What Doflamingo said only pertained to Paramecias, Zoan awakening mostly affect the user's body, the Nika fruit is special..
Contrary to Paramecias, it seems Logia Awakenings affect terrain permanently, and they may have a body transformation, at least get bigger.. Crocodile and Ace have been shown to affect weather by just being on the island, so it would also make sense that Logia's intangibility their emblem feature becomes enhanced, such as Immortality on par with the Holy Knights and Gorosei, and possibly giving CoC temporarily in that state..

3. That would be the case, but what if.. The Red Line is removed entirely?..
 
#7
My deep analysis: Your old avatar was better

Supporting evidence:
- having a non One Piece avatar differentiated you more from the crowd. Luffy and Kizaru are a dime a dozen around these parts
- Yoh Asakura fit the thoughtful and theory-focused threads you make better than an action scene. Your current avatar erroneously gives the vibe of an "Agenda Piece" poster
- action panels are generally worse avatar choices than character portraits, as cramming all the necessary elements into the little squares we are provided with for avatars renders even the most elegant action panels somewhat hard to parse
 
#8
What you just represented isn't an analysis its just your opinions some i agree with some i don't and analysis is a detailed examination of something be it a character, arc, ability or what have you

Lemme give you a quick analysis just as an example i'll use best girl Rebecca

If I where to analyze her as a character I'd first break down her back story and how it made her who she is today I'd break down her abilities and why I'd argue she's one of the best observation haki users and I'd talk about the good and the bad and even her potential in the story be it characterization wise or ability wise

You can't just throw together a bunch of opinions and call it an analysis

Also not all awakenings work the same Zoans don't affect the environment at all Luffy so far has been rhe only one shown to do so and he's an outlier
I don't consider anything you've ever said about the story to be an actual analysis and you're just being territorial about the story.

As it is, I am the ONLY person in this entire forum who can demonstrate a higher understanding of the story.

Your idea that Rebecca has one of the strongest observation levels in the story is ridiculous. You're trying to compare your thoughts on Rebecca being an observation specialist to my cemented facts. You can't argue with them, and you're stupid to even try.

In comparison, awakenings were given rules directly in the story, it's not an opinion. Loki is the embodiment of a war god, and it was a direct parallel by Jarul. Finally, the Red Line is without a doubt hosting animal nurseries and migration routes. These are facts. All of them.

You arguing against these facts is just showing how much you don't understand the story.
 
Last edited:

Yoho

I'm Quite Dandy
#9
I don't consider anything you've ever said about the story to be an actual analysis and you're just being territorial about the story.

As it is, I am the ONLY person in this entire forum who can demonstrate a higher understanding of the story.

Your idea that Rebecca has one of the strongest observation levels in the story is ridiculous. You're trying to compare your thoughts on Rebecca being an observation specialist to my cemented facts. You can't argue with them, and you're stupid to even try.

In comparison, awakenings were given rules directly in the story, it's not an opinion. Loki is the embodiment of a war god, and it was a direct parallel by Jarul. Finally, the Red Line is without a doubt hosting animal nurseries and migration routes. These are facts. All of them.

You arguing against these facts is just showing how much you don't understand the story.
Laws Awakening doesn't affect the environment

Neither does Kidds

Not a single Zoan outside of Luffy effects the environment

Rebecca has shown observation Haki to very high levels its her specialty

Again what you presented isnt an analysis it's just a collection of opinions that can easily be disproven


Imagine being 50 and still using prepubescent words like calling people stupid on the internet 😐

😂😂😂 you're the definition of midlife loser take yo ass off the internet and get a job yah bum


Also I never actually made a character analysis on this site and never claimed my post where
 
#10
Laws Awakening doesn't affect the environment

Neither does Kidds

Not a single Zoan outside of Luffy effects the environment

Rebecca has shown observation Haki to very high levels its her specialty

Again what you presented isnt an analysis it's just a collection of opinions that can easily be disproven


Imagine being 50 and still using prepubescent words like calling people stupid on the internet 😐

😂😂😂 you're the definition of midlife loser take yo ass off the internet and get a job yah bum


Also I never actually made a character analysis on this site and never claimed my post where
Law's K-Room and R-Room are both external applications of his fruit ability. Normally, the room extends from his own body. The awakened ability instead allows him to project the room to places other than his body including on his sword and thereby changes the physics of it.

Kid's awakening is the Assign ability and it allows him to place magnetic poles on things other than his own body.

You're demonstrating a low level of reading comprehension and a bad attitude.
 

Yoho

I'm Quite Dandy
#11
Law's K-Room and R-Room are both external applications of his fruit ability. Normally, the room extends from his own body. The awakened ability instead allows him to project the room to places other than his body including on his sword and thereby changes the physics of it.

Kid's awakening is the Assign ability and it allows him to place magnetic poles on things other than his own body.

You're demonstrating a low level of reading comprehension and a bad attitude.
Says the old man who acts like an edgy teen
 

Yoho

I'm Quite Dandy
#13
I told people I was 50 on a post a long time ago to see if you guys would operate under false assumptions, and that's exactly what you're doing lol

I'm not 50.
What grown man lies about their age 😐

Also its not false assumptions if you say you're 50 i didnt assume anything you said you're 50 I didn't assume it
 
#14
What grown man lies about their age 😐

Also its not false assumptions if you say you're 50 i didnt assume anything you said you're 50 I didn't assume it
Nobody cares, it was a deliberate bait and you fell for it.

What grown man can't figure out how Law and Kid's awakenings affect the surroundings?

Your reading ability is in question, now, and it's entirely your own fault.

Step aside, let the real readers try to meet the challenge you failed so easily.
 

Yoho

I'm Quite Dandy
#15
Nobody cares, it was a deliberate bait and you fell for it.

What grown man can't figure out how Law and Kid's awakenings affect the surroundings?

Your reading ability is in question, now, and it's entirely your own fault.

Step aside, let the real readers try to meet the challenge you failed so easily.
😐 they don't tho their awakenings don't work that way at all
 
#18
Show me you can make a deep analysis that makes perfect sense OR forfeit the idea that you can make sense at all.

I'll demonstrate three right now.

1. Logia awakenings use the same traditional rules that other awakenings do. They cause the abilities to affect things other than the user's own body.

2. Loki is the embodiment of a War God, he won't follow Harald's pacifist ways.

3. Destroying the Red Line would mean animal nurseries and migratory routes are devastated.

Supporting evidence: Doflamingo explained the rules of awakenings and he included that the abilities begin to affect things other than the user's body, and a War God usually has extreme convictions of violence rather than half-hearted dreams of peace. The Red Line is the largest landmass on the planet, there are countless animals forming nurseries and migratory routes on it.

The stuff I just said is indisputable. There's no disputing it, it's practically facts.

Note: I challenge you, try to make a deep analysis. However, if anything you say can be disputed, then it's not a real analysis at all. It needs to be rock-solid or it shouldn't even be considered a proper idea. You need to be able to defend the idea. If it becomes indefensible or open to question, then it's not good enough.
Analysis: Katakuri gave up vs Luffy. He did not lose as he stopped using awakening and decided to lay back.
 
#19
Analysis: Katakuri gave up vs Luffy. He did not lose as he stopped using awakening and decided to lay back.
I might agree with that. Luffy didn't seem to exhaust his physical capability, but rather his emotional capacity.

I would, however, warn people against trying to persuade everyone that a powerscaling element is unquestionable. They're usually based on emotional reasoning rather than logical. I "feel" that Katakuri could've fought longer. Is it an objective fact? Yes, if it can be proved he wasn't incapacitated.

Again, though, Luffy has a habit of defeating people's dreams rather than the person themselves. It might come down to how we view a "win" which is subjective.
 
#20
1. What Doflamingo said only pertained to Paramecias, Zoan awakening mostly affect the user's body, the Nika fruit is special..
Contrary to Paramecias, it seems Logia Awakenings affect terrain permanently, and they may have a body transformation, at least get bigger.. Crocodile and Ace have been shown to affect weather by just being on the island, so it would also make sense that Logia's intangibility their emblem feature becomes enhanced, such as Immortality on par with the Holy Knights and Gorosei, and possibly giving CoC temporarily in that state..

3. That would be the case, but what if.. The Red Line is removed entirely?..
It is an assumption that what Doflamingo said only applies to the Paramecia variety. The fact that Luffy's fruit follows that same rule isn't a coincidence. There's my defense for that.

The Red Line... Hmm... I'm not sure what you mean by removing it entirely? I would assume that removing it entirely has many of the same consequences as destroying it.
 
Top