FIFA World Cup 2026 - In Mexico,USA and Canada/Worstgen Kicktipp version 2.0

THE FINAL: SPAIN OR ARGENTINA WHO IS WINNING!?

  • Total voters
    61
Etzel Andergast

Etzel Andergast

‎
#7,201
#7,201
D. Plant said:
What did they do?
Click to expand...
The controversy around Argentina vs Peru in 1978 is often framed around two key elements.
First, the political context: Argentina was under a military dictatorship, which heavily used the World Cup as a propaganda tool. This environment has fueled long-standing suspicions about possible external influence around key matches, even though nothing has ever been proven.
Second, the scheduling issue and alleged last-minute change: in the decisive second group stage, the kickoff times were not aligned as expected for a fair competitive setup. The match schedule was reportedly adjusted shortly before the games, meaning Argentina played after Brazil had already beaten Poland 3–1. This change meant Argentina entered the match knowing exactly that they needed a four-goal victory to reach the final. Critics argue that playing after a confirmed result, instead of simultaneous kickoffs, created a significant competitive advantage and raised questions about fairness. Peru lost to Argentina for 6-0, but Peru team was considered a good team during all the tournment. So the result was also considered very suspicious
 
Etzel Andergast

Etzel Andergast

‎
#7,203
#7,203
Buusatan94 said:
There is a lot of shaddy stuff about 78 world cup and Argentina, because Argentina had just came under the control of a military junta (said junta would fall four years later due to their disastrous attempt to take the Falklands from UK) and said junta wanted Argentina team to win world cup as a political victory and to legitimize their power.
Click to expand...
Its more than that actually
 
Etzel Andergast

Etzel Andergast

‎
#7,204
#7,204
Etzel Andergast said:
The controversy around Argentina vs Peru in 1978 is often framed around two key elements.
First, the political context: Argentina was under a military dictatorship, which heavily used the World Cup as a propaganda tool. This environment has fueled long-standing suspicions about possible external influence around key matches, even though nothing has ever been proven.
Second, the scheduling issue and alleged last-minute change: in the decisive second group stage, the kickoff times were not aligned as expected for a fair competitive setup. The match schedule was reportedly adjusted shortly before the games, meaning Argentina played after Brazil had already beaten Poland 3–1. This change meant Argentina entered the match knowing exactly that they needed a four-goal victory to reach the final. Critics argue that playing after a confirmed result, instead of simultaneous kickoffs, created a significant competitive advantage and raised questions about fairness. Peru lost to Argentina for 6-0, but Peru team was considered a good team during all the tournment. So the result was also considered very suspicious
Click to expand...
@Buusatan94
 
D. Plant

D. Plant

‎
#7,205
#7,205
Buusatan94 said:
There is a lot of shaddy stuff about 78 world cup and Argentina, because Argentina had just came under the control of a military junta (said junta would fall four years later due to their disastrous attempt to take the Falklands from UK) and said junta wanted Argentina team to win world cup as a political victory and to legitimize their power.
Click to expand...
Geopolitical rigging the world cup is some crazy stuffs and they still legitimize it is even crazier.
 
kekaro

kekaro

‎
#7,207
#7,207
Etzel Andergast said:
The controversy around Argentina vs Peru in 1978 is often framed around two key elements.
First, the political context: Argentina was under a military dictatorship, which heavily used the World Cup as a propaganda tool. This environment has fueled long-standing suspicions about possible external influence around key matches, even though nothing has ever been proven.
Second, the scheduling issue and alleged last-minute change: in the decisive second group stage, the kickoff times were not aligned as expected for a fair competitive setup. The match schedule was reportedly adjusted shortly before the games, meaning Argentina played after Brazil had already beaten Poland 3–1. This change meant Argentina entered the match knowing exactly that they needed a four-goal victory to reach the final. Critics argue that playing after a confirmed result, instead of simultaneous kickoffs, created a significant competitive advantage and raised questions about fairness. Peru lost to Argentina for 6-0, but Peru team was considered a good team during all the tournment. So the result was also considered very suspicious
Click to expand...
Thats also 90% probally true
 
Luffy is the mc

Luffy is the mc

‎
#7,213
#7,213
K!NG HARA$H!MA said:
Halland is usually missing in many matches and only show during counter and tap ins.


I guess Gabriel vs Haaland will be a solid match
Click to expand...
Because he changed his way of playing with Guardiola, he wasn't like that when he played for Salzbourg and Dortmund.
But like every other 9, he has games where he only needs one opportunity to score and other games where he needs more.
It's often linked to their motivation and focus during the game.

Obviously with Norway he knows he needs to rely more on himself, that's why he has more goals than games with his national team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top