Search results

Man. The previous post you made a salient point only to undermine it for no reason in the very next breath. Michelle. What. Come now.

Things wolves probably don't say.

Of those 3, Orca. again, "of those 3" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

Am more inclined to believe a neutral who is a shopkeeper though. It reminds me of a half dozen setups where the neutral was just a boon to anyone who interacted with them. Mercenary, bounty hunter, neutral killer, etc. Basically, yes, you can kill them, but they'd make a better ally than a...

Yeah but there's over one and a half thousand posts, there's gotta be something substantial to go off of. I've read nothing but the stuff posted since the last vote count, and I already see 3 wolves. And a lot of folks who are being funny intentionally or not.

@Pot Goblin Yeah, sure, but what are your win conditions? (lol) As a neutral, are you willing to vote for wolves that are voting for you, because they're being wolfy and also trying to kill you? Is that a reasonable thing we can do together.

Just keeping track for my notes. All of this is getting dumped into my empty notebook so I have some basis for voting at some point.

The best reason given to join a wagon- none!

Does it, though?

I am marking this down as something I also believe based on quickly scanning the pages from the last vote count, onward. So, I agree with my own past self here.

Does it, though? @Michelle is this still your stance?

Then of those 4 names I would hit Orca. Of those 4 names is carrying a lot of weight in that sentence, however. I have others I already want to see obliterated but maybe that's just me.

This is the funniest post I've read in years, and Duckt's not even trying to be funny. The humor is in the absurdity of the situation and I have no idea what's going on, and I doubt even with context this could start making sense. Duckt I've seen 4 percent of this game and it's kinda loony so far.

@Hayumi can you ping me back with the post number of your reasons for Luka or Orca? Or just quickly reexplain whichever you prefer. I have a really blank solve notebook over here but at least I understand why Udell could be voted here just by scanning the page.

For context, is this normal for this site / board culture? I need to know if I should start voting for stuff that's obviously wrong or if I gotta let it pass because it's normal here.

I am not sure I follow these two sentences. Are you giving up on using any mechanical info in the game whatsoever? And in the next sentence, do you mean, she's been insisting you're scum without evidence? Is there evidence to the contrary, is there a reason why the guess is obviously wrong...

ROFL Wowee. Good luck with that. Ekko randed wolf in another game, therefore his credit is ruined forever in all future games. Not the best way to play a game, but as grandmaster Ben Finegold would say, that's a legal move.

What's the census?

I mean, I been playing with her for five years. If you don't want to know what I think about her, which is one of the only useful things I can say right now, I can be quiet. I just don't know why you wouldn't want to know what I think based on experience. She's a very powerful player, and...