Search results

Absolutely nonsensical and I can prove it via the canon Yeah doffy was able to mog diamond jozu a top commander of whitebeard but somehow zoro fresh out of the timeskip would totally beat doffy:whitepress::whitepress::endthis: Btw just like sanji, zoro couldnt see the strings doffy uses to...

Nobody's interested because you start debates and run away

Crazy but true 1760805591 STABBED THROUGH THE HEART (by absalom) BUT YOURE TOO LATE. DARLING YOU GIVE LOVE A BAD NAME

Dont run away baby. Engage in debate. Youre losing. I want to put my finisher down but I need you to flail like an idiot in denial first

Well I'm glad you had the courage to respond. Most abandon ship when it's sinking. I have much more respect for someone that's willing to engage in good faith, though. Something you are not doing currently. For example; I can totally picture a giant version of Pizarro made of red rock with...

You can't just have your conclusion and then try to pick the evidence to support it. You are supposed to gather the evidence and then come to a conclusion. What you're doing is the opposite of logic and reasoning. It's also kind of antithetical to any objective standard ever. You're just like...

He didnt strawman you. You heard the strawman fallacy and misapplied it to this situation. At most you can say its equivocation but thats an exaggeration

Fire post. I was gonna add some panels but you covered the gist of it on your own.

Sanji has no ap issue. Get out the fan club if your own goal is to passive aggressively smear sanji with outlandish claims that have no basis in the canon. Sanjis ap far exceeds all commanders besides zoro. Even then its close. Lets debate. Youve got the best sanji defenders attention. Lets get...

Oh so there is more than just one. Youve named 2. Im willing to bet theres more than just those 2 parralels. Either way... even with only 2 parralels my point still stands strong. It can be evidence. Just not strong evidence.

Can but not always is the rule. Just like how bon clay did end up sanjis opponent with the shared parallels(there were more than just the kicking styles of fighting) you can also have matchups that dont share parralels. The parralels are evidence... Just not strong evidence. Seeing a dark...

Agreed. Fire TAC the clown. TAC the clown to the wall Listen I do believe judge was alive at this point in time. So it could have been sanji related. Imagine judges named attack: spear of the king, as he impales xebec from behind like a high budget squard

Dogshit chapter. No Wanji

Bruh who cares? I cant believe yall still do this all these years later

Yeah nice analogy but it doesnt work. If I made a video of me cutting a cake and you learn from it... then yeah What youre doing is called equivocating. A false equivalency is a logical fallacy Now if i made a video of me cutting a cake but I edit it out the gripping of the knife and the...

I mean you asked for the logic behind it. I never said it didnt take technique to do correctly or efficiently.

Teaching someone by showing them a technique is still teaching. Whether intentional or not. If I watch an informative video that explains how nukes are built... whether intentional or not... I was taught

Take a knife and cut at a tendril of flame. See the seperation? Thats the logic.

Wtf are you talking about? Kinemon taught him the technique. Any swordsman can learn to cut fire.

Ridiculous. Axe hand Morgan did the same to garp as squard did to white beard.