Search results

Sorry, missed it was compulsive in the setup. Point still stands, though.

I mean, you gave your plan openly in the thread. I'd assume scum would be able to work around it... or just holster and let you wipe out anyone who tried scumhunting. Or, again, just subvert the King's opinion through powerwolfing.

So if, for example, there was an earthquake, you'd still see no differentce between the two options? Maybe the context explains it, but this is just stupid lol.

Sorry, I was at work today. Just glad I got on before EOD.

...Okay, I know I just said I'd ignore this, but I really think you're barking up the wrong tree here. I played a game with scum!Ratchet, and they were way more subtle about their partners there. No way all three of them pair themselves so closely together as scummates.

I'm not touching the Manga/Flower/Ratchet/hime clusterfuck anytime soon. One of them'll end up being lynched or overmedicated before D2 anyway with how much they're fighting.

Hello, I'm alive. Sorry for leaving thread for so long, this game is difficult to catch up to.

I suppose. We're all putting a lot of faith in the watcher not being inactive or less confident, though, and in people listening to the watcher's reads and agreeing with them... and, of course, since the Watcher will have TMI, they're likely to appear scummy in how they make their arguments.

Yes, and in order to communicate that fact, they have to claim. Even if the Watcher manages to get intel on several scum before they commit their actions, we're at a huge disadvantage after the Watcher dies, because then scum get to NK and visit whoever they want without any way of us proving it.

...But surely that means scum can also do the same thing? Last thing we want is to trust everybody who makes a push out of nowhere.

If you really want to have coordination, just have people claim what actions/who they're going to visit that day. It'll be a lot easier to catch out scum that way, and we play things slowly we can probably catch scum from their mech, instead of just lynching four times as fast and praying we hit...

The real issue is that coordinating actions will, naturally, give scum info. If we coordinate too obviously, scum will be more likely to NK someone who wasn't visited, thus increasing the number of townies total. ...And this is, of course, assuming that scum don't simply try to play whoever...

??? If I, as town, believe that one of your pics is wrong and do not visit them, thus stopping that person from dying, how is that throwing? Isn't that like saying that if a vig chooses not to shoot someone they find towny, they're throwing?

My issue with this is that its pretty easy to lead to false positives/negatives. If one third of the playerlist has more people who have a different solve to the consensus, they'll be flagged as scum. Equally, if scum all visit the person their third is in, they won't be spotted by this...

Good morning, everyone!

/in

I'm in! 1. Beatrice (Umineko) 2. Nico Yawaza (Love Live)

I'm down to do that. I've been informed that my poison is not public, but the user who is poisoned is informed.

I believe the poison is public, but why would you want me to poison you?