oda said beckman is shanks equal for a reason
that way zoro can fight shanks and luffy can fight beck
but if it's the other way around, it's fine, they're equal lol
Are you sure that Islam denies evolution ? I looked it up it says that it has no stance on evolution. I think It only, by default, rejects the idea of humans originating from apes.
Was Luffy on the rooftop at the start of the Kaido fight capable of beating him? Yet he got way stronger and defeated Kaido. I don't see you saying it doesn't make sense.
No. Oda doesn't care about Zoro's lineage which is why he revealed it in the SBS. He said it himself that he's probably not touching this topic in the future.
if zoro actually fights kizaru then he's beating him or inconclusive so that's the least delusional
both law/kid beating bb/shanks are delusional asf. If I had to rank, I'd say Shanks a lil more since he has a lot more man power than Blackbeard it seems.
Maybe but I don't think mastering Enma when Oden got it and current Enma is the same.
Oden basically got it as a brand new sword, no one had ever used it before and it grew with him.
I think Zoro had more trouble than Oden because he had to make Enma accept him as his new wielder which was...
well this is a nice possibility and would give zoro's backstory more depth
but i don't think oda cares to draw anything related to zoro's past at this point which is why he revealed this stuff in sbs..
For Blackbeard, it makes sense, he's always been a sly rat.
For Shanks though, I didn't expect him to be such a coward & hypocrite. He could've fought Big Mom & Kaido for the poneglyphs but never did.
And didn't he call out Green Bull for being afraid of the new era? Turns out they went and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.