Search results

The question is more rhetorical

Speaking of Day 1. Where were you?

He lead the wagon to off a scum day 1. I don’t want to hear anything about Alexis being bad town

Seems that a lot of actions don’t work on this game. Burns and poison seem to have gone through though…

No, lol I was simply giving my thought on the scenarios given, Essentially Charlie asked what’s more likely the cause of your food to taste bad; A - lack of seasoning despite it being sold as spicy B - the uber driver fell in the canal and the bottle of water spilled over, but luckily the...

well the way Charlie categorized it, it bacjef Brad into a corner. Because his scenarios were: Brad is lying or scum have defied the odds

Brad lying seems more likely. Like I didn’t win the lottery game yesterday at the hockey game. Seems unlikely that I would win it twice in a row let alone once.

We?

Not if I can help it and not on my pocket watches

Well there went my claim. :-/ what rotten luck.

Assuming of course that inactivity is the action.

Wouldn’t giving double action to a. Inactive lead them to be modkill for double inactivity?

So you made sure to leave no tracks. Interesting

3 voters but 5 votes

Can we roll an insight as to why there’s been so few kill actions? Ekko did mention n the write up of a qualm before the storm. And now, the day started with people claiming having been hurt left and right

tsk tsk, you knew the consequences of signing up to an Ekko game

I had deduced that based on this: But then again could just have been his village

according to who?

There is something in the back of my head that I keep as a thought but it’s more a metagame than a read and I’ve already mentioned that I consider meta to be cheating and invalid as an argument