Search results

Cause its AM and he's frankly F*ench so his opinion and words are invalid and moot, also 99% of the time I vote AM to be lynched here or on NF lmao. Reactive on his part. "No sold my reply" Cuz it was dumb my dude.

So your admitting you are an inactive shitlord? lol

Yeah I'm not reading past what Michele (or was it Naomi) said about the past 10 pages earlier from what I was told with Ratchet's read list but I keep it close to the heart I'm okay with yeeting Ekko/Emil tho

I haven't even voted yet

Yes but I'm keeping it to the chest at the moment.

AM really isn't someone you should be considering their input on given he's the king of inactivity and low posting/coasting. Its almost an OMGUS vote, not that I really care.

Oh Magic got killed?

Not gonna read 108 pages, cba.

Sup

Hmmm

I need a group :)

Whose in it?

Sup

Hmm

Maybe

Dibs on Bonshrewd

Pretty much on the spot. Especially the part I bolded. He wanted to play a victim by claiming and justifying his action to vig me because ostensibly "I do not argue in good faith" and you always ruin the game for him to the point he doesn't want to play anymore. There was no attempt at trying...

Your reasoning was not sound, and your behavior in day 1 with me and Ekko was objectively and tangibly the definition of 'childish' as well as selfish. I don't care either way about how you are looking at the optics of this, your play and reasoning were poorly contrived and formulated, that's...

Your behavior is the issue, not your reads. Stop acting like an obstinate child when you don't get your way, you are not able to correctly read many players so the comment about Ekko is irrelevant. If you want to keep playing this, then I'll give you further ample reasons not to "engage with me"...

If by 'mogged' you mean Ratchet going full perfidious albion, then sure. No one else bought it.