Search results

I do not believe Garp loses as character. He doesn't believe change possible in the Marines, and with him at the top just below admirals, he can at least protect as many people as possible. It's not a flawed argument, it's a human argument.

Swords swallowers indeed on a pedestal as 90% of showing are pro-sword-propaganda. Sanjino-shitters in the dust once again. Kuma GOAT as always, Dragon is cool guy not explained why he so shit as an adult. Garp = GOD.

Gaimon winner, as he finally has a box to go to

The only difference is that Mihawk and maybe Ryuma had the sword and swordsmanship as their way of life and their "dream", while for Roger and Ahanks seems to be more a weapon. At least from depiction, Mihawk seemed interested in being the strongest swordsman and Shanks wasn't, but at the same...

Is it by inheritance that then Shanks would be a hakiman?

Maybe this egg can only be broken by hakimen>

The clash is literally a clash with no named attacks and ROger confirms he's using conqueror. And the no name clash has the same size trails as the full mass attack.

I mean it was a deranged position in the first place, but claiming roger wasn't a swordsman what agenda would benefit?

mental derangement. Literally posts a panel where haki trails of no name attacks are indistinguishable from haki trails from the attack with all mass behind them, follows this by saying that haki trails are all that matters.

MODS = GODS

My mistake in talking to you, you got me again. You are dishonest, intellectually challenged and frankly a waste of my time.

testosterone issue I call it

You are not afraid in contraposition with a woman, meaning that only a woman can be a victim of that. Otherwise your entire phrase doesn't have sense. Because you are a MAN because you are not [..] afraid of what a man could to to you alone. Dishonest as always. Twisting your own words, little...

Yeah but this makes women a subset of people with female characteristics ANYWAY, do you understand basic set theory?

Then I am the one twisting uh? You used "people" to define the women who have female sexual characteristics. Literally. Not projecting. You said that ONLY women have to be worried about that, which means me, a man, doesn't have to. Do you have an understanding of what you say or you just...

You can explain what colour are. Colour is the appearance that things have that results from the way in which they reflect light Also, a colour perception by humans is defined by its wavelength. Simple like that, two definitions. Maybe for poor scholarised manchildren it's unexplainable. My...

You ok lil buddy, where do you live, the Predator planet? C4N is a terminally online furry, who has too much time on his hands. His entire tirades boil down to that.

Why are you not addressing my point? All my questions are quite fair and well asked, I am not twisting, I am asking you to define the words you use. If you cannot do that, it means you do not know the words you use. There is not one single word I use that I wouldn't know the definition...

So, thanks for starting to give definitions. A woman is, at least for your definition: A victim of sexism and rape threats dominated by the patriatchy Powerless against a man Shut down because of your gender identity (which mean all women share the same gender or same spectrum of genders)...

This is a circular definition man. Saying that you are a man because you are not a woman is offensive. You just said you cannot say what a woman is, so how do you know you are not one? Are you saying that only women can be feminine? What is feminine? How can you say that you are close to a...