Search results

I sue the word rich to talk about the ruling class the the owners of the means of the capitalist production (usually, from rather big compagnies) In this case, leftists are not present (or they are not really leftist). You can have leftist millionnaire, but there is a point in the spectrum...

True, but not in whole cake Carrot is the friend we lose along the way No. It's not No reason... Yet* Trust me, this is a setup. (if it isn't, it would be meh indeed).It makes perfect sense for her to lose at this point. You should've see my reaciton when I read the chapter, I was delighted...

How rich are we talking about here? Millionnaire or billionaires? :DeepThink: Sure and my name is Nami No iti's quite easy to understand actually You did the meme Dude, I'm chill, this is not even my second form yet Strange :Think:

If Carrot comes back, she won't be a "background character", trust me. That would be really surprising.

:tai_shook: :lawsigh: Maybe you should read them "rich lefties" ? :ohreally: Say the guy who blame "leftists" and "the transgender propaganda" Ffs

Not necessarily. In fact it could even be an amazing thing if Oda chooses to continue her story. A loss is always more interesting than a win to create inner conflict. I in my mind, Oda wanted to setup an inner conflict within Carrot. This loss being the reason why she choose to actually accept...

You are not politicized enough to understand what I'm telling you mate Again, stop speaking or start listening. Transphobia is not "a difference of opinion". It's an oppression. Don't expect me to be kind with you if you are not willing to be kind to others I don't mind people changing. But I...

Ok your post is interesting but I will make notes for a few things: 1. Carrot HAD a post, CLEARLY depicted. She was literally constructed like the lookout. There is no "if", she had an active, deliberate, post on the Sunny, I will touch on that later. She was drawn visibly on the post more...

Just stop speaking Change yourself and your vision of politics ethically, it would be a start. The ignorance :seriously: And yet. You just did exactly that: Here:

Wow - That freaking movie just KO-ed me. I've no emotionnal strenght left.

You know. There is a principle in marxism and materialism in general that allows us to quickly know how much energy we need to develop (if we even need to even try) to try to make someone understand leftism and basic ethical principles. It usually linked the material interests of the individual...

Fascism is capitalism.

Of course you don't. Looking at what you just said, you would probably not understand the problem or deny it even with an elaboration. This is a kind of "ready for fascism" rethoric that I can't really fix with an explanation. You will understand the problem when you will suffer under it...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026-USCT-Strategy-1.pdf