As I said, your typical cope.
You are part of the, he painted his sword fan base. That tells me everything I need to know and explains why your post sounds like a little kids throwing tantrum.
The more strong characters we see without a black blade the more my theory that we don't see most people with black blades because they're not willing to risk their lives to create one is starting to come true.
Here you go again with your typical cope.
Information about thoee titles have been out for years. Some understood and some didn't it. You're somebody who did not understand. That's your fault.
What is this cope?
When has the manga ever suggested having having a blade and haki means that you will automatically have a black blade? It is never suggested that. The manga has made it clear it takes a lot of work and effort to create a black blade. Nike and Imu not having a black blade...
Read the manga. Multiple times it has talked about being strong isn't just about having power. It's also about having thr skills to properly control that power.
Just because they both use weapons doesn't mean their haki use with their weapons are beyond Mihawk or Ryuma's.
Oda didn't wait long for us to know Mihawk and Ryuma's swords are black blades. Clearly he wants his readers to know when characters have black blades. Why all of a sudden change it? Nobody can provide me with a logical explanation why we're having to now wait over 100 chapters. It's because...
I can see Mihawk and Ryuma swords are black yet Oda had Mihawk and Ryuma tells us their weapons are black blades because that is the way Oda decided to identify black blades.
Oda didn't do the same for Ryokugyu because it's not a black blade. Believing the manga doesn't need to identify the...
As I've already told you, Imu and Nika have showed ability and fighting strength beyond weapon use. You can't say the same about Shanks, Rogers, Rocks and more.
There isn't a scene in the manga stating Ryokugyu weapon is a black blade? Oda did that for Mihawk and Ryuma's black blade. That...
How?
Nika and Imu are df merchants. They are what people claimed Shanks was for years. Characters with power and ability beyond weapon strength/skills.
You mean that character who survived against Zoro and didn't get oneshot because he was lucky Zoro didn't realize he had haki at the time? Oda always have to protect Luffy's opponents from Zoro.
When will people stop underestimating Zoro? People said he was going to neg diff on the rooftop. In...
People swore Zoro wouldn't fight a yonko. People swore Zoro wouldn't fight a gorosei. Zoro will fight Imu.
Oda has the perfect set up for Zoro to fight Imu. Luffy is currently out of commission. He's tired, still recovery from G5, and need food. Loki is tired from staying in his df giant dragon...
We might want to wait for the manga chapter. We know the spoiler has a bad reputation for posting BS.
Either the spoiler is inaccurate, Oda is retconning is work again or Loki has nevered used that power against a powerful haki user.
We saw Loki froze that nightmare creature in chapter 1171...
Do you?
The manga showed Harald using energy and power fighting the guards, Gaban, and Shanks before he fought Loki. After Loki arrived he took a few hits from Loki before he we gaining full control of his body. He then stood there and allowed Loki to kill him.
After one attack of the squirrel was like okay I like you. Even though the squirrel destroyed his hammer. People act like Loki beat the squirrel into complete submission. That didn't happen.
I didn't ignore any context.
You ignored the fact Harald used energy and power. fighting Gaban and Shanks. Stop acting like tthat battle never happen. Loki didn't fight a 100% fully controlled Harald.
Even while under theinfluence of Imu, he told his son what he needed to do so he wasn't...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.