do you even know what that word means lol
I am cool with people choosing their means of profit distribution, you are not. I just quickly pointed out how authoritarian that gets.
Who's to say I can't earn more in a private venture and therefore would prefer that?
You don't see how quickly authoritarian you are getting here? You are deciding what's good for me without even realizing it
If I wanted that 'd join a co-op or workers owned company. I am glad I get that option in a capitalist society, I wouldn't even had a choice in creating anything but that in a socialist society
You are replying to my comment to specifically not enagage with it at all and instead push your propaganda
You treat your ideology as a religion and it's cringe, see reasons why think so in the page before
again that's just an oversimplification, most companies are not owned by this caricature of capitalist you have. A lot do have a share ownership structure or are owned by stockholders such as 401k holders
if you cant engage with the reality that most americans hold capital of some sort then you want a vibes based argument and idc for those
Like I said, don't engage in strawmans
715,000 active 401(k) plans operating across the United States. While only a small fraction of all registered small businesses sponsor a plan, large corporations skew the numbers: roughly 79% of American workers are employed by a company that offers a 401(k)-style retirement plan. [1, 2]...
stockholders can be the workers, management, even the owner who at time works for said companies.
It is an extreme reduction to make your "capitalism bad" point. If you're going to engage in something I'd advise to not straw man the opposition as it just makes your argument look ridiculous...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.