What statement lol? You're shifting the burden of proof. Keep crying.
Zoro hasn't been seen using ACoC, therefore the default stance is that he did not use it at all.
Therefore to prove he used it would be a positive claim and your own burden.
Dumbass.
You expect it because that's the default stance and because it'd be your burden to prove he used ACoC.
Do you not realize how how this is a loss-loss situation for you? It's your burden of proof, and you cannot prove it.
Wouldn't be the trillionth time shit happened or characters were held back due to plot lol. Using your logic he should've used ACoC from the start in the parts of the fight we did see, which he did not. So we can assume that consistency was kept unless proven otherwise,
which you cannot prove...
Cause we don't see it? Lol
Hitchen's Razor says we can dismiss anything that does not have evidence, you'd need evidence that they used it. Otherwise the default stance is they did not.
Seraphim are undamaged? So Luffy and Zoro did not use Acoc yet? I know Oda's saving those two's greatest power 🔥 🔥 🔥
Luffy and Zoro will replicate Ocean Sovereignty
As if Oda will make someone that important (Saturn) fight someone other than Luffy
Just like he let Law 1v1 Doffy in Dressrosa because of their past and themes...
Guys do you not learn?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.