Search results

Firstly, you're just like the other guy that seemed to think im trying to force the idea that god does indeed exist here Ill clarify again Im not talking "'How does god exist", or "Why does god exist", or "which god is the true one", etc I'm talking about, WHAT IF god exist, and WHAT IF god...

It is, something doesnt need to be written on paper to be a law law isnt necessarily written formaly that just proves my point exactly you live in a healthy environment, and you are told that you are supposed to behave nicely towards your parents, and IF you violate that, then what you do is...

So you were born with a mind that hitting your mom is bad, that stealing someones food is bad, etc? You do realize it's society (law) that shape a personn right? 1629908539 yet, again, no counter argument lmao you cant prove that there is objectively good/bad

So what is your guide when doing daily activities? arent you doing activities such that you dont violate the laws? So what if a person is only good because of him following the laws?

tell me what motives should one impose when theyre doing right deeds

you dont realize that this essay of yours is utterly irrelevant? this explains it all i never forced my claim that god does exist im talking WHAT IF god exist, and claiming that IF god exist, and you're OBJECTIVELY proven to be wrong, then of course, you deserve to be punished 1629907636...

There is no objectively good/bad if God does not exist, simply because of a simple reason If there is no God, there is no absolute law Meaning, the law will be subjective Why is killing ants punish you nothing while killing humans punish you a death sentence? There is literally no difference...

1. i literally used my mind to counter your argument 2. not literally yeah, further proves you have no argument left, i checkmated you imagine thinking a person deserved to be punished by god if they are proven to be wrong is retarded, but thinking a person deserved to be punished by a Judge...

So, no argument, what an open minded person xD

you can accept punishment from HUMANS if youre proven to be wrong but it seems that you cant accept punsihments from your CREATER if youre proven to be wrong yeah yeah, im the retard lmao

Atheis If a person is "accused" of being guilty, they could defend themselves if they think they're wrong. BUT, don't be mad if in the end you're objectively proven to be wrong, and thus, sentenced to whatever sentence that suit your misdeed You get the analogy? If God is proven to be exist...

"World Nobles" Yeah, this confirms Ryuma singlehandedly defended Wano against the equivalent of Admirals back then, nice catch

Sulong Inu vs Hybrid Jack Lets goo

Dragon scale durability Dragon pure brute strength Dragon speed (hybrid) But obviously, he lacks of haki and swordsmanship

Spoil us please :neesama:

When will the spoilers drop?

Not most likely, it's literally what happened Marco was knocked out thats why both king and Queen assumed hes already dead

I legit laughed at this lol, never noticed that small detail on zoro

It's not, and no, your analogy is slightly inaccurate, it depends on the difficulty one needs to fight the other if that untrained guy can high diff the other in a 1 on 1 and that guy could handle both people whom he can high diff individually for some time and if that trained MMA fighters can...

Because before zoro could help usopp, Sanji came immediately and no, his hands werent free, hes clashing with kaku