Search results

night kill

had a bit of time to respond to your question queen prime sus as of now is rej made an earlier commitment to carry town but has failed to match that in participation. hopped on to ask for popular lynch candidates in an attempt to blend in with the popular town opinion. if he isnt scum, he is...

so if you know what it is thats why you sus him? how can anyone prove this . a no claim game is all kinds of fucked.

irc is he some investigator how limited is he in revealing what he found @Noctis

To fit in with town and go with the popular opinion and at the same time get rid of a townie yes. it was the same reason serapheonix pushed me to vote on tac last time. he knew he was a townie and was ok pushing for it not stopping me from pulling my vote last minute. "This doesn't amount to...

initial reaction was an ok mate my problem comes with your assumption and not considering the other possibility cause you clearly voted for celestia. at this point I am ok with whatever yall decide. wouldnt want to spew bs or contribute nothing again.

would you prefer am less active and quiet again not to respond to the questions people have on my game. thats surely isnt more sus at all or "spew bs, contribute nothing" all over the thread again. give me a break.

no just looking for a justification beyond I defended tac cause clearly many people did . could clearly see how you would make a connection now. I had highlighted it felt like a town vs town argument in an earlier comment. turns out I was wrong.

"And, now you are questioning the mislynch when we had reason to? Lol" NO, am questioning why you didnt consider the possibility most scum would also fit in the ongoing town lynch clearly because you voted for celestia . as rayan pointed out this is also valid. I strongly iterated I was in...

scum strategy is to blend in with town. rej stays quiet more so than I but he jumped in on the bandwagon vote against celestia so he must not be on your prime sus list.

"why? because you led the vote against celestia and your decision could have possibly cost us follow reborn's way or no way huh you seem to rule with an iron fist here. its time we start questioning your motives as well." to this "you suddenly became suspicious of those who casted vote on...

I am not suspicious of people who voted celestia I said we should start questioning your motives cause they are clearly flawed to pin sus on only those who didnt vote on who you voted for . dont misconstrue what I said. the quote is there.

drago seems to have flipped his vote last minute.

interested to see why bogard pointed me out when finalbeta and cinera initially had him as a prime sus with cinera going as far as to call his actions scummy.

interested to see why bogard pointed me out when finalbeta and cine its quite obvious you led the lynch against celestia so those who didnt vote are automatically in the sus list . oh no a scum knowing who townies are would definitely not join the bandwagon and also look at the possibility of...

they arent cause he's included.

why? because you led the vote against celestia and your decision could have possibly cost us follow reborn's way or no way huh you seem to rule with an iron fist here. its time we start questioning your motives as well.

:okay:

I was unusually active first game because I found ha001 comments about killing everyone as a newb player unusual and tac defending him came as even more sus. I am not one to force a reaction through the aggressive playstyle approach you favor. BS isnt a nice way to put it, you can play this...

well who voted on celestia isnt a good basis to judge scum. I should know first hand i wasnt scum when I voted tac last round . it pins a target on the voter if the person would flip town. No smart scum would want that big target on themselves. I was personally asleep and woke up to the info...