Search results

Next time I’m killing Reborn.

You have no fucking evidence against me. It's god damn baffling how you managed to convince anyone of your suspicions against me. "Meta, TAC DIDN'T ACT LIKE THIS IN HIS FIRST GAME!!! OR HIS SECOND!! WHEN HE HAD NO POWER ROLES!!! HIS THIRD WAS DIFFERENT TOO! WEEEEEIRDDDDDD!" Your logic...

STOP. DOING. THIS. YOU ARE BASING MY CURRENT PLAY STYLE OFF META. WHY? EACH GAME IS DIFFERENT. THE ONLY REASON YOU HAVE TO USE META TO JUDGE MY ACTIONS IS TO SET UP A PICTURE OF HOW I SHOULD ACT, SO YOU CAN MAKE A (FLAWED) CASE AGAINST IT. You are purposefully trying to toss me under the bus...

16

I might be willing to get lynched if it meant shutting him up. So we had 1 Independent and 1 Mafia already die, yeah? I said originally we likely had 4/5 scum all around, so that means at most we have 3 left and potentially just 2 left. I'm inclined to think that we only had 1 independent...

So no evidence. Don't bother accusing me of jack shit until you can provide me some proof of wrong doing.

Someone. PLEASE. Show me the evidence. Show me where I've been guilty. Where I've been suspect of harboring ill intent for the town. And do not rely on Reborn—should anything of substance be held by that man, it'd of been said already. Rely on my game style so far.

If I had the ability to kill, I'd of removed you already. That alone should prove my innocence.

Because, at the time, there was All Red and Al (who I hadn't been as adamant for) kept pushing the "Lynch Beta 1.0" narrative to give us more general info. And, I only unlynched later in the game and missed my opportunity to switch back at the tail end. Al. That will was fake as shit and I...

No. Because Beta now is able to be tested continuously. Day 3, we'd ask him; "Beta 1.0, who did you visit? Oh, you visited Bogard? Who visited Bogard?" And, based on if anyone was there, he'd be easy to verify. If he was bullshitting, it's pretty bad. Besides, your suspicion for this...

He's bluffing. He can't say jack shit without dying, but knows I'm bad? And his immediate suspicions were all META. His argument that it's a role based function to prove I'm guilty (proof requires some sort of evidence, mind you. He's produced none) is bollocks. If you let Reborn lynch me...

1 — How would Mafia know that Rej is going to be seen murdering people? Wasn't that how Beta 1.0 caught Rej? That type of preordained actions—to have Rej take the fall immediately with the understanding he was going to be lynched—is beyond the scope of normal thinking. 2—I supported Beta 1.0...

If I reveal my role, will you believe me? I get the feeling you still won't, and you'll just dick me outta a great, GAME CHANGING power.

...?!?!?!?! IN WHAT WORLD IS IT WRONG TO HUNT THE MAFIA?! I don't understand this logic! I am doing everything right! I support common sense in the first day, I take an aggressive stance on Rej (and still remain skeptical on Al and Beta 1.0) day 2! And I seem to be the only person able to cut...

Kiwi, you're smarter than this. Confidence in this game is essentially the mandate to play. If you're scum (potentially what Reborn is, if he continues pushing me past the point of absurdity) then he'll be requiring plenty of it. Frankly, accusing someone requires that degree of confidence and...

And I did from the beginning. Whereas you were more on Beta for "information" Would be very convenient to kill Beta 1.0 in a fake lynch and keep Rej alive, eh? But I was consistently against Rej.... And Reborn has you all drinking the koolaide that I'm evil. And you, specifically, think I am...

Reaction to you posting a fake will? Lmao.

Beta. My ability is really, really strong.

Let's review Al's game so far; Day 1 — Argues ferociously with Flowers, who is expertly scum hunting and made amends with Reborn. Day 2 — Flowers is dead, as per what the Maf want (because she was on to someone) and Al's excuses are rubbish. Day 3 — Al votes the lone guy (Beta 1.0 is dead)...

In the words of the host, this shit is easy to fake otherwise.