Search results

Hm? It was in one of the posts you replied to. It quite literally is confirmation just like Luffy taunting Kaido was confirmation he can hurt him. Same exact scene. Same exact narrative purpose.

What are you talking about? I already mentioned the parallel between both fights in an earlier post. Who says I’m making excuses? I already conceded that if Zoro uses King of Hell and doesn’t damage S-Hawk, then you’re right. But I am very confident that won’t happen. Fact is Zoro taunting...

You just asked the same question I already answered lmfao So you are just speculating and have no answer for why Oda drew the exact same scene of Luffy taunting Kaido after he started blocking his attacks and Zoro taunting King after he started blocking his attacks. If Zoro goes into King of...

Do you think Oda drew this scene for shits and giggles? Why didn’t Oda just have Zoro call them invincible, why did he specifically refer to them as practically / almost invincible? That dialogue alone confirmed the fact that Zoro knows he can hurt them.

He already knows he can damage Lunarians based on him making fun of King for blocking which paralleled Luffy making fun of Kaido for the same thing. And nothing has changed since then, King didn’t deny the fact that Zoro could hurt his flame form, nor did he tank any of Zoro’s attacks in flame...

He says they’re almost invulnerable, meaning he knows they can be damaged which the dialogue in the King fight supports

It was already Zoro