Controversial β πΈπ. π½πππππππ πΏππππ β
- Status
"I heard enough then... @Sir Yasheen @CoC: Color of Clowns are you with us? Do you have anything to add still?"
I'll add one thing: we've heard all trial about how dangerous Mr. Reloaded is. And, yet, all trial, who has chosen to pursue violence? I ask the Judge and Jury to look with their own eyes, and ask who, during this trial, was instigating violence.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this trial taught me one thing: now I understand why we're called "the defense". Because that's what we did. Defend ourselves against constant threats and attacks.
I rest my case.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this trial taught me one thing: now I understand why we're called "the defense". Because that's what we did. Defend ourselves against constant threats and attacks.
I rest my case.
I
From my perspective, both sides have failed at painting a good narrative and sequence of events so that we the jury could trully understand the charges and come to a final conclusion. With that being said, my opinion is as follows:
There were many charges put against the defendant, but most of them were ignored by both sides and a great focus was given on charges of Furrydom and Zoophilia.
The persecutor presented many screenshots as evidence of the defendant showing signs of interest in animals and even calling himself a furry for a moment.
The defense tried to defend those statements and evidence with a the idea that they were simply jokes.
But, i've come to agree with the persecution that after the same joke is being told multiple times, there's gotta be some truth to it... And of course, he is without a doubt a scalie. So i'm inclined to see him guilty of both Furrydom and Zoophilia.
Regarding the rest of the charges, i think both sides have failed to present evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of those things. So i'm inclided to see him innocent of those charges.
So in conclusion, my opinion:
The defendant shall be found guilty of the charges of Furrydom and Zoophilia, but not the rest of them, which are:
blackmail
extortion
two accounts of 1st degree murder
three accounts of 2nd degree murder
criminal negligence
criminal abandonment
thievery
cannibalism
I will reconvene with my fellow Jurors to come to a final conclusion
There were many charges put against the defendant, but most of them were ignored by both sides and a great focus was given on charges of Furrydom and Zoophilia.
The persecutor presented many screenshots as evidence of the defendant showing signs of interest in animals and even calling himself a furry for a moment.
The defense tried to defend those statements and evidence with a the idea that they were simply jokes.
But, i've come to agree with the persecution that after the same joke is being told multiple times, there's gotta be some truth to it... And of course, he is without a doubt a scalie. So i'm inclined to see him guilty of both Furrydom and Zoophilia.
Regarding the rest of the charges, i think both sides have failed to present evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of those things. So i'm inclided to see him innocent of those charges.
So in conclusion, my opinion:
The defendant shall be found guilty of the charges of Furrydom and Zoophilia, but not the rest of them, which are:
blackmail
extortion
two accounts of 1st degree murder
three accounts of 2nd degree murder
criminal negligence
criminal abandonment
thievery
cannibalism
I will reconvene with my fellow Jurors to come to a final conclusion
Yes it was. Mrs. Reloaded had all her limbs intact when she was resurrected. No cannibalism.
We agree on the defendant being guilty for furrydom. As for the rest, the evidence was inconclusive to prove guilt and therefore, the defendant is innocent until proven otherwise.
We the members of the jury, will discuss between us and come up with a unanimous verdict to be announced tomorrow.
We agree on the defendant being guilty for furrydom. As for the rest, the evidence was inconclusive to prove guilt and therefore, the defendant is innocent until proven otherwise.
We the members of the jury, will discuss between us and come up with a unanimous verdict to be announced tomorrow.
My fellow juror, I urge you to reexamine this case thread, specifically page 13 in which the former prosecutor, Al Sama's states that she is "in perfect health" as well as in Page 14, our own doctor, Indigo, also makes a similar professional diagnosis, no mention of cannibalised parts......Fortunately.
- Status