2 sword Zoro vs Law
- Thread starter Garp9
- Start date
- Status
Clown Hawkins with laws crew as his lives wanted no smoke. That the whole reason he didn't have any during the final battle. Obviously implying Hawkins with or without lives wanted no parts of law.
Law beats every opponent Zoro has to . Look at the whole manga not just the Zoro parts... Last sentence shows ur a clown. Now Zoro stronger then any swordsman because one day he'll be the strongest. Pretty sound logic there guess Zoro Fuji/vista/shank to huh.
some of the lost causes probably.
How does that imply he not proficient? Zoro he's haki like twice an he's a god at it apparently... All we know is laws haki good enough to no sell a high tier attack, something Zoro yet to do.
How? There's nothing implying law can't use it other then headcanon...
Zoro didn't beat Hawkins he's alive an while post fight. Law killed Hawkins wtf are u even saying here. 2 piece is in a different section. Like lol need just said Zoro did more damn to a **** law killed like seriously.
And I'm guessing in 2 piece law can't solo killer an pica smh. Anyway ur post still sounds dumb the guys law beat> pica/killer.
How on Earth did Zoro own Hawkins more? Was he completely incapacitated after Fighting Zoro. Like u **** lie to damn much. The rest is nonsense.
probably because law fights with hax not AP.... The admirals need df to replicate mihawk feats too nobody gives a damn. Zoro has nothing putting his haki over doffy stop.
Law can one shot Zoro with multiple moves ur point?
HOW?
Law beats every opponent Zoro has to . Look at the whole manga not just the Zoro parts... Last sentence shows ur a clown. Now Zoro stronger then any swordsman because one day he'll be the strongest. Pretty sound logic there guess Zoro Fuji/vista/shank to huh.
some of the lost causes probably.
How does that imply he not proficient? Zoro he's haki like twice an he's a god at it apparently... All we know is laws haki good enough to no sell a high tier attack, something Zoro yet to do.
How? There's nothing implying law can't use it other then headcanon...
Zoro didn't beat Hawkins he's alive an while post fight. Law killed Hawkins wtf are u even saying here. 2 piece is in a different section. Like lol need just said Zoro did more damn to a **** law killed like seriously.
And I'm guessing in 2 piece law can't solo killer an pica smh. Anyway ur post still sounds dumb the guys law beat> pica/killer.
How on Earth did Zoro own Hawkins more? Was he completely incapacitated after Fighting Zoro. Like u **** lie to damn much. The rest is nonsense.
probably because law fights with hax not AP.... The admirals need df to replicate mihawk feats too nobody gives a damn. Zoro has nothing putting his haki over doffy stop.
Law can one shot Zoro with multiple moves ur point?
HOW?
Probably because he's not even in the immediate area when the fight ends for starts. There's also no mention of Drake betrayal during Hawkins last few mins on Earth.
what's this have to do with law?
What when's it implied u need oden haki to take the sword? An it's not like oden got enma before the Kaido fight. So it'd be beginner lvl oden haki anyway.
Through headcanon sure
what's this have to do with law?
What when's it implied u need oden haki to take the sword? An it's not like oden got enma before the Kaido fight. So it'd be beginner lvl oden haki anyway.
Through headcanon sure
nope, its apparent if you read the manga
no sell? reading law piece, i see..
Zoro is using haki on his sword, unlike law.
Zoro bested a FBH user with his haki, unlike law.
Zoro has this squiggly stuff that seemingly could be this flow shit that got hyped in recent chapters, unlike law.
As much as i love law, his CoA game isnt impressive at all.
I never said law cant use it, the contrary even, i made a post in this thread saying i believe its possible that he could, as he is using a cursed sword already. Im not convinced that he could though, as what i mentioned above casts doubt on this.
edit: so pretty much "
" on there is nothing that implies it.
Zoro killed hawkins 3 times, law didnt do damage to hawkins, except you are talking about the offpanel "fight" that im not taking into account because we dont exactly know happened.
law piece is on a different website boi
no sell? reading law piece, i see..
Zoro is using haki on his sword, unlike law.
Zoro bested a FBH user with his haki, unlike law.
Zoro has this squiggly stuff that seemingly could be this flow shit that got hyped in recent chapters, unlike law.
As much as i love law, his CoA game isnt impressive at all.
I never said law cant use it, the contrary even, i made a post in this thread saying i believe its possible that he could, as he is using a cursed sword already. Im not convinced that he could though, as what i mentioned above casts doubt on this.
edit: so pretty much "
" on there is nothing that implies it.Zoro killed hawkins 3 times, law didnt do damage to hawkins, except you are talking about the offpanel "fight" that im not taking into account because we dont exactly know happened.
law piece is on a different website boi
Last edited:
Not surprised I been stop taking u serious.
heard this in PH and DR lol
So prove it! Shouldn't need circumstantial evidence. It's apparent right?
See this is why arguing with Zoro fans is so annoying. They don't read the manga right then act like they do SMH. Now do I need to post the panel of law on sell doffy attack with hardening or are u going to read the source material???
When was it literally ever implied anywhere, using haki on sword> using it on ur body?? This is what I'm talking about making shit up to fit a narrative. Hell where's it implied law can't do that too actually?
How's this an advantage for Zoro? Law did what Zoro did against someone with stronger haki, without the need for him to use it.
Another prime example, has that squiggly stuff once been implied special inverse? So how TF would that be an advantage over law.
No evidence of this whatsoever. Ur criteria above Is random, on top of law again defensively showing better hardening feats then Zoro.
So how's it an advantage? If u think law could also use the blade. Shit confusing
No Zoro had 3 killing blows stop by Hawkins hax. Even if u try to randomly discount something obvious like law beating him. Law still did better then Zoro. He basically control the whole fight with Hawkins, an toke no injures. Zoro was pressured at times an injured.
heard this in PH and DR lol
So prove it! Shouldn't need circumstantial evidence. It's apparent right?
See this is why arguing with Zoro fans is so annoying. They don't read the manga right then act like they do SMH. Now do I need to post the panel of law on sell doffy attack with hardening or are u going to read the source material???
When was it literally ever implied anywhere, using haki on sword> using it on ur body?? This is what I'm talking about making shit up to fit a narrative. Hell where's it implied law can't do that too actually?
How's this an advantage for Zoro? Law did what Zoro did against someone with stronger haki, without the need for him to use it.
Another prime example, has that squiggly stuff once been implied special inverse? So how TF would that be an advantage over law.
No evidence of this whatsoever. Ur criteria above Is random, on top of law again defensively showing better hardening feats then Zoro.
I never said law cant use it, the contrary even, i made a post in this thread saying i believe its possible that he could, as he is using a cursed sword already. Im not convinced that he could though, as what i mentioned above casts doubt on this.
edit: so pretty much "" on there is nothing that implies it.
edit: so pretty much "
" on there is nothing that implies it.
No Zoro had 3 killing blows stop by Hawkins hax. Even if u try to randomly discount something obvious like law beating him. Law still did better then Zoro. He basically control the whole fight with Hawkins, an toke no injures. Zoro was pressured at times an injured.
i agree law could solo killer and maybe pica too.
The bolded has no basis at all though.
killed 3 times, law did no damage.
We are still not using the offpanel fight you are using to satisfy your fanboyism. Not only because it was off-panel, but also because its possible law didnt do it on his own...
read my previous post
The bolded has no basis at all though.
killed 3 times, law did no damage.
We are still not using the offpanel fight you are using to satisfy your fanboyism. Not only because it was off-panel, but also because its possible law didnt do it on his own...
read my previous post
Last edited:
i agree law could solo killer and maybe pica too.
The bolded has no basis at all though.
killed 3 times, law did no damage.
We are still not using the offpanel fight you are using to satisfy your fanboyism. Not only because it was off-panel, but also because its possible law didnt do it on his own...
EPIC MEME MATERIAL @Admiral Lee Hung
read my previous post
The bolded has no basis at all though.
killed 3 times, law did no damage.
We are still not using the offpanel fight you are using to satisfy your fanboyism. Not only because it was off-panel, but also because its possible law didnt do it on his own...
EPIC MEME MATERIAL @Admiral Lee Hung
read my previous post
he'd beat both, there's no maybe involved.
HUH? HAWKINS>Kill
Smoker/vergo> pica
Yet Hawkins was chopped up on the floor in front of him. Let me guess a ghost did that...
Wait since when? Lol what possibly there's literally nobody else in the room with them.The reaching amazing....
Wait mes gk can't one shot Zoro? Based on what ????
HUH? HAWKINS>Kill
Smoker/vergo> pica
Yet Hawkins was chopped up on the floor in front of him. Let me guess a ghost did that...
Wait since when? Lol what possibly there's literally nobody else in the room with them.The reaching amazing....
Wait mes gk can't one shot Zoro? Based on what ????
I did
Im not Zoro
I just looked up the panel myself, im not seeing a no-sell, but maybe you have a different definition for that
i agree this could be debatable.
And if law could do it, he must be super stupid to not try and use it against doffy who blocked his room attack with haki.
Yeah, with a hax df, not with haki. And we were talking about haki, but nice try to deflect again
So you are like a flatearther looking at a literal photograph of the earth claiming there is no evidence. Bravo.
read my posts
So you are using something that happened off-panel, where we dont even know law fought 1v1 against hawkins, as an actual argument, but you are here accusing people left and right of reading 2 piece.
Cant get any more disingenuous than this.
Zoro was injured, and you probably heard this alot since it happened, because he protected tama and luffy and dodging wasnt an option.
I disagree
Smoker > pica?
Or whoever freed law helped him. This is why we sane people are not using that instance because it is unknown Mr. Law-Piece is the greatest manga ever
nobody in the cell, there is something there of whom we cannot possibly know if he helped
It seems you are not only reading law piece, but on top you are a Spee D. Reader.
what a joke this is
welp, i'll be honest with you, i totally misunderstood your one-shot statement and i'll grant you that one.
GK can oneshot Zoro
Im not Zoro
I just looked up the panel myself, im not seeing a no-sell, but maybe you have a different definition for that
And if law could do it, he must be super stupid to not try and use it against doffy who blocked his room attack with haki.
Yeah, with a hax df, not with haki. And we were talking about haki, but nice try to deflect again
So you are like a flatearther looking at a literal photograph of the earth claiming there is no evidence. Bravo.
read my posts
So you are using something that happened off-panel, where we dont even know law fought 1v1 against hawkins, as an actual argument, but you are here accusing people left and right of reading 2 piece.
Cant get any more disingenuous than this.
Zoro was injured, and you probably heard this alot since it happened, because he protected tama and luffy and dodging wasnt an option.
Post automatically merged:
I disagree
Smoker > pica?
Or whoever freed law helped him. This is why we sane people are not using that instance because it is unknown Mr. Law-Piece is the greatest manga ever
nobody in the cell, there is something there of whom we cannot possibly know if he helped
It seems you are not only reading law piece, but on top you are a Spee D. Reader.
what a joke this is
Post automatically merged:
welp, i'll be honest with you, i totally misunderstood your one-shot statement and i'll grant you that one.
GK can oneshot Zoro
Last edited:
Irrelevant Zoro collapse after single blow from somebody weaker then doffy. Laws endurance>> Zoros by feats.
all laws opponents have better potrayal then pica stop the B's. Smoker a logia so the hiding shit gets him nowhere, vergo/Hawkins are clear as day. Also doffy hit law once alone in that fight. That far from own.
In 2 piece maybe, I hear he's high commander lvl lls.
What?
Serious attack lol. Law stopped more attacks by the way, an unlike Zoro actual did something worth a damn in the clash.
Looked like he was sweating, while Kyoshiro smiling. Nah I'd take doffy over not trying Kyoshiro.
Law actually injured doffy, Zoro ran
lol an he'll still do less then law in the Kaido fight.
Lol at best he injures him. Which basically law/kid/Luffy will all also do. Stop the bs u know damn while he isn't getting the final shot. He's luck he's even in the fight.
all laws opponents have better potrayal then pica stop the B's. Smoker a logia so the hiding shit gets him nowhere, vergo/Hawkins are clear as day. Also doffy hit law once alone in that fight. That far from own.
In 2 piece maybe, I hear he's high commander lvl lls.
What?
Serious attack lol. Law stopped more attacks by the way, an unlike Zoro actual did something worth a damn in the clash.
Looked like he was sweating, while Kyoshiro smiling. Nah I'd take doffy over not trying Kyoshiro.
Law actually injured doffy, Zoro ran
lol an he'll still do less then law in the Kaido fight.
Lol at best he injures him. Which basically law/kid/Luffy will all also do. Stop the bs u know damn while he isn't getting the final shot. He's luck he's even in the fight.
Sad part u believe this SMH.
So for clarification law didnt no sell doffy 5 color string attack with hardening? I need confirmation so I can prove u don't read the manga.
i agree this could be debatable.
And if law could do it, he must be super stupid to not try and use it against doffy who blocked his room attack with haki.
nothing debatable about it, nothing implies hardening a sword> hardening the body. U made it up obviously, since u posted no evidence of it. Or if we actually read the arc, Law could just so happen to be heavily fatigued against doffy. Forcing him to prioritize his DF or haki.
deflect lol, it doesn't matter how law did it. He didn't need haki so it wasn't used. Zoro needing it to do what he did, just proof zoro needs hardening to compare to laws normal Slashes.
what about this implies what u were asked? I want something involving Zoro an those lines, being anything other the an artistic choice.
You've post no evidence, then had the nerve to act like u provide something. Wtf about what u post implied hardening a sword> hardening the body? Or that Zoro haki was special because of squiggly lines lol.
THEY CONTRADICT EACH OTHER
Give a single indication law fought with help? Hell where his help suddenly disappear to? The fault is with u, ur claiming law had help in a fight with nobody else in the immediate area. Burden of proof is on you to prove that, not me to prove he didn't. Talk about disingenuous SMH.
Doesn't matter why he was hurt anymore then it matters, law not hurting Hawkins because he used non lethal attacks instead of lethal ones. Fact of the matter is Zoro was pressured an hurt. Law was incomplete control.
U disagree law can beat killer or pica. An u got the nerve to be calling somebody else a flat earther....
logia intangibility for the golem, an superior cqc feats. Ur argument what?? Let me guess he can't destroy the golem lls.
Prove it, burden of proof is on u. Nobody in the immediate area when we see the aftermath. So u need to provided something that implies ur line of thinking like sane people do. Claiming u didn't see it isn't an argument. Since the aftermath clearly implies what happened.
If nobody in the cell why would u assume he's helped TF. Drake walking up afterwards isnt proof, or an indication he's involved in the fighting.
Good the evidence hawkins/law in a cell alone, with the door closed, both injured. Random dude in the hallway. Now why are u assuming he's involved in the fighting again?? Besides just being a dumbass?
Says the guy questioning if law can beat pica. Despite cutting a bigger mountain then him, and somebody with better haki. Doesn't get anymore dumber then that SMH.
I can see why simple plot elements are so hard for u. U forgot mes too.
Im not Zoro
I just looked up the panel myself, im not seeing a no-sell, but maybe you have a different definition for that, as you have for oneshotting
I just looked up the panel myself, im not seeing a no-sell, but maybe you have a different definition for that, as you have for oneshotting
And if law could do it, he must be super stupid to not try and use it against doffy who blocked his room attack with haki.
deflect lol, it doesn't matter how law did it. He didn't need haki so it wasn't used. Zoro needing it to do what he did, just proof zoro needs hardening to compare to laws normal Slashes.
You've post no evidence, then had the nerve to act like u provide something. Wtf about what u post implied hardening a sword> hardening the body? Or that Zoro haki was special because of squiggly lines lol.
THEY CONTRADICT EACH OTHER
Give a single indication law fought with help? Hell where his help suddenly disappear to? The fault is with u, ur claiming law had help in a fight with nobody else in the immediate area. Burden of proof is on you to prove that, not me to prove he didn't. Talk about disingenuous SMH.
Doesn't matter why he was hurt anymore then it matters, law not hurting Hawkins because he used non lethal attacks instead of lethal ones. Fact of the matter is Zoro was pressured an hurt. Law was incomplete control.
U disagree law can beat killer or pica. An u got the nerve to be calling somebody else a flat earther....
Smoker > pica?
Prove it, burden of proof is on u. Nobody in the immediate area when we see the aftermath. So u need to provided something that implies ur line of thinking like sane people do. Claiming u didn't see it isn't an argument. Since the aftermath clearly implies what happened.
If nobody in the cell why would u assume he's helped TF. Drake walking up afterwards isnt proof, or an indication he's involved in the fighting.
Says the guy questioning if law can beat pica. Despite cutting a bigger mountain then him, and somebody with better haki. Doesn't get anymore dumber then that SMH.
I can see why simple plot elements are so hard for u. U forgot mes too.
Last edited:
Soo Zoro will have coa haki that is so strong that can prevent Law Df + his own haki from working?
When Zoro has already been proven to lack the durability, the smartness and the speed to counter Law..
Another case of the zoro fandom being the laughing stock of this forum. BTW It no longer entertaining but embarasining.
When Zoro has already been proven to lack the durability, the smartness and the speed to counter Law..
Another case of the zoro fandom being the laughing stock of this forum. BTW It no longer entertaining but embarasining.
- Status