Speculations Akainu is Not a Good Guy
- Thread starter AlmightyGunther43
- Start date
I never said it was purely to lure Whitebeard in, but that it was a reason.
A public execution is also a show of might and is also morally wrong - they could've killed him in Impel Down if just killing him was their priority.
As for Roger - eh, that was early series fuckery for one. Later it is halfway explained Roger disbanded his crew and gave himself up anyway so the ex Roger pirates probably respected his decissions. But arguing in either direction is just making up headcanons rn
A public execution is also a show of might and is also morally wrong - they could've killed him in Impel Down if just killing him was their priority.
As for Roger - eh, that was early series fuckery for one. Later it is halfway explained Roger disbanded his crew and gave himself up anyway so the ex Roger pirates probably respected his decissions. But arguing in either direction is just making up headcanons rn
Btw I never said Koby wasn't right - he was, of course
But just from a military perspective it was not hisnplace to make such speeches when no war crimes were being commited. Did they mix up their priorities? Hell yeah, saving soldiers should've been number 1 on their to do list once Ace and WB were done in.
But it's not a war crime to instead go after the enemy and try to eradicate as many of them as possible.
But just from a military perspective it was not hisnplace to make such speeches when no war crimes were being commited. Did they mix up their priorities? Hell yeah, saving soldiers should've been number 1 on their to do list once Ace and WB were done in.
But it's not a war crime to instead go after the enemy and try to eradicate as many of them as possible.
Not a war crime. However, still questionable. For being so questionable, Luffy will answer him. We all already acknowledge this.
There is an agenda here. It's Luffy's Ideal agenda. In that agenda, nobody dies. Akainu's ideals differ greatly from Luffy's. (Well, people do die... but not for that reason. See Luffy Vs. Vivi for details).
This storybook is not a world where.... real world applications truly apply... not everybody gets their fair say in things. It's Luffy's way ONLY.
Akainu cannot be considered correct in Luffy's world, and IT IS Luffy's world.
It's an entire world created to show how Luffy is correct in everything... Blind Justice, Absolute Justice, and Lazy Justice are probably all going to be wrong.
There is an agenda here. It's Luffy's Ideal agenda. In that agenda, nobody dies. Akainu's ideals differ greatly from Luffy's. (Well, people do die... but not for that reason. See Luffy Vs. Vivi for details).
This storybook is not a world where.... real world applications truly apply... not everybody gets their fair say in things. It's Luffy's way ONLY.
Akainu cannot be considered correct in Luffy's world, and IT IS Luffy's world.
It's an entire world created to show how Luffy is correct in everything... Blind Justice, Absolute Justice, and Lazy Justice are probably all going to be wrong.
Last edited:
Akainu is a Monster, what other words are appropriate for him?
Absolute justice regardless of anyone does not only apply to people below it, but also to people above it, even dare to argue against the Gorosei.
The definition of justice held by Akainu is not in accordance with the true definition of justice. Iron-handed and has no values of Right or Wrong. beside him he is always right other than that he is wrong.
Mass murder of refugee civilians, killing soldiers who are fleeing war (even though fleeing war is a sin) and attacking opponents who are already helpless is not a form of justice.
If Akainu is in the field, the Impledown function will not be carried out, with his position as Fleet Admiral now his justice is paralyzed because the people under him have their own concept of justice except Ryokugyu.
Absolute justice regardless of anyone does not only apply to people below it, but also to people above it, even dare to argue against the Gorosei.
The definition of justice held by Akainu is not in accordance with the true definition of justice. Iron-handed and has no values of Right or Wrong. beside him he is always right other than that he is wrong.
Mass murder of refugee civilians, killing soldiers who are fleeing war (even though fleeing war is a sin) and attacking opponents who are already helpless is not a form of justice.
If Akainu is in the field, the Impledown function will not be carried out, with his position as Fleet Admiral now his justice is paralyzed because the people under him have their own concept of justice except Ryokugyu.
this may mean that, like the perfect soldier big boss from metal gear solid, he eventually ends up against everyone. i think akainu is a rare type at that high of a level because he actually believes in his code of justice. he's thorough and absolute. he doesn't bend the rules. in fact he's one of the only people who tried to stand up to the gorosei and argue with them over THEM possibly failing to adhere to the code of law.
so i think akainu will always be a villain to the straw hats because of their beliefs, they can never get along. but also akainu might turn against the government or try to take it over because he thinks he knows better than them about how to uphold the law. and then he would be a wild dog without a leash
so i think akainu will always be a villain to the straw hats because of their beliefs, they can never get along. but also akainu might turn against the government or try to take it over because he thinks he knows better than them about how to uphold the law. and then he would be a wild dog without a leash