Questions & Mysteries Bet thread: Does Greenbull have one of 12 supreme blades?
- Thread starter kurwa
- Start date
No, that would give him a top tier logia + black blade + supreme blade. It would make him look an entire lvl above Fujitora on paper. Fujitora has been the most swordsman inspired Admiral and for Greenbull to not only have a black blade but also a supreme black blade would give Fuji nothing to stand out.
Great grade black blade vs Supreme Grade non black blade is a good balance.
If Greenbull doesn't have a black blade then it's fair game.
Great grade black blade vs Supreme Grade non black blade is a good balance.
If Greenbull doesn't have a black blade then it's fair game.
Which is why Fuji doesn't have a black blade. Aramaki might be the armament focused one.
Which is why GB apparently has a black blade.
But that's exactly the balance.
Black blade 21 Grade Sword VS Non black blade 12 Grade Sword.
Both with top tier dfs to boot.
gb is inspired by a swordsman just as much, to the point of literally having the same name ("Aramaki") as his movie samurai inspiration
But that's exactly the balance.
Black blade 21 Grade Sword VS Non black blade 12 Grade Sword.
Both with top tier dfs to boot.
Being black blade great grade would still make it inferior to supreme swrod hello?
Just shushui is inferior to other swords. Hell, shushui is not even better than enma in the same class
You are trying to force fake balance when aramaki supposed to be superior in offense
You don’t see aramaki being said to have same lvl of coo as fuji
Just shushui is inferior to other swords. Hell, shushui is not even better than enma in the same class
You are trying to force fake balance when aramaki supposed to be superior in offense
You don’t see aramaki being said to have same lvl of coo as fuji
Same for me.
I have said in the past that I see Aramaki's situation like Ryuma's: O Wazamono forged black.
If he had a supreme balde too, he would be almost too much.
But very happy to be wrong in that case.
In fact, It's the opposite that doesn't make much sense:
If he has one, it's because he forged it. If he's not a good swordsman, it doesn't even make sense for Oda give him a sword like that, let alone create a random samurai just for Greenbull to have stolen a sword that he doesn't even use properly.
Not to mention, can you Imagine that Oda, in the final battle against the Marine, creating a plot of a super random samurai having his sword stolen, just so a side character like Greenbull has a decorative sword.
And in all that you would STILL have a unnamed new character that forged a sword black. It has ten thousand times more sense It Is Aramaki in the first place.
I have said in the past that I see Aramaki's situation like Ryuma's: O Wazamono forged black.
If he had a supreme balde too, he would be almost too much.
But very happy to be wrong in that case.
In fact, It's the opposite that doesn't make much sense:
If he has one, it's because he forged it. If he's not a good swordsman, it doesn't even make sense for Oda give him a sword like that, let alone create a random samurai just for Greenbull to have stolen a sword that he doesn't even use properly.
Not to mention, can you Imagine that Oda, in the final battle against the Marine, creating a plot of a super random samurai having his sword stolen, just so a side character like Greenbull has a decorative sword.
And in all that you would STILL have a unnamed new character that forged a sword black. It has ten thousand times more sense It Is Aramaki in the first place.
