48h days?


  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
What happened to wholesome Ripped

I'll give it to you, what you are saying does make sense.
It's quite possible that this evidence is situational and was scrutinized due to the flip of Conq.

It's a natural response I believe, with the circumstances.


So, do you believe that Aries is in league with Tobi?

Despite it being dirty info, it sounds like Tobi has admitted that one of the scums are one of the people on the wagon
I am wholesome but I absolutely can't stand gamethrowing cringe
 
nope.
you also tried to save one of your mates by saying that he was a lie detector then he flipped scum and they lynched you.
Another time You fake slipped on the thread to get them to lynch you instead of your mate.
This time you tried to CFD someone else to save your mate.
you always do this type of things and you have to stop.
That's wrong. That game my scum buddy asked who can volunteer to be lie detected. None of the scum buddies volunteered so I did.
In the other game all of my team were caught by mech info in the same night by a sensor and players thought the player who had mech info was a psychic and it was between me, one of my buddies, and another town. My buddies told me to sacrifice myself to save the other one.

What both of those completed games had in common was that my scum buddies were caught by mech info. Last day no scum was caught by mech info and for me to be scum I have no reason to save Conq who was not caught by mech info. Me being scum I have no reason to start a wagon on Conq.

T-Peins arguments are so flawed.
 
What would be the motivation for in a world if I am scum why would I switch my vote to Ekko tying up the wagons like that in the last minute?
Because you would lunch a town and save a scum mate? And you would have enough of an excuse being ekko was sus too?

What would I gain for tying up the votes?
The lynch would go to RNG. And you can avoid responsibility somewhat with that by saying "either one could have gotten lynched, it was rng"


I voted Conq 2 times and why would I not want to keep my vote on Conq?
That's exactly the problem. If you are scum, voting for conq makes you seem town. And the moment any info comes out that casts suspicion on any other player, you switch to them. So you can say that you did vote for conq first, you did vote for him 2 times. And you only voted someone else when there was info on them.

But the problem is that the info on mango or ekko wasn't solid at all. At least not as much as conq. We were literally trying to figure out the midnight role block stuff. You just went and voted for ekko before that.

You could very well be town. But you are sus for now.
 
Because you would lunch a town and save a scum mate? And you would have enough of an excuse being ekko was sus too?


The lynch would go to RNG. And you can avoid responsibility somewhat with that by saying "either one could have gotten lynched, it was rng"



That's exactly the problem. If you are scum, voting for conq makes you seem town. And the moment any info comes out that casts suspicion on any other player, you switch to them. So you can say that you did vote for conq first, you did vote for him 2 times. And you only voted someone else when there was info on them.

But the problem is that the info on mango or ekko wasn't solid at all. At least not as much as conq. We were literally trying to figure out the midnight role block stuff. You just went and voted for ekko before that.

You could very well be town. But you are sus for now.
Explain to me if I am scum, why would I want to take risks by making the votes a tie and it being rng when it could very well mean Conq will still get lynched?
 
Normally I prefer to get suspicion off me without having to claim but since most of the players here are incompetent then it leaves me no choice but to claim next day.
 
I hate Mexico wifi, was disconnected all day and just barely got it back now, as for Juliet's questions the reason I didn't answer them was because they were irrelevant to my main argument which was why wouldn't you save your scum mates if you had the chance. The fact someone else bothered to answer them should tell you how little of a argument you had in the first place. Your entire arguments are reliant on people having knowledge on your play style to make sense of your actions but this is the first time we are playing with one another. You have yet to answer or prove why it doesn't look bad and no going town is dumb for not believing in me is a terrible argument in a game where the whole gist is to lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top