Does somebody belive flat earth?
- Thread starter Veljko
- Start date
look that up yourself, because you didnt understand it. Honestly this experiment is getting regurgitated by flattards all the time, but it simply doesnt say what they think it does lmfao. dont know the other ones by their names, but i think ill assume you (flattards) misunderstand it like the first one.
another interesting experiment you might want to take a look at: Cavendish experiment
nasa is not relevant to our shape of the earth. ancient greeks managed to conclude the earth being a globe and even calculated the circumference and got really close to the actual number.
thats the way to go if you are a reality denying conspiracy nutjob
[automerge]1623784860[/automerge]
satellites are fake, obviously. Its all cgi. Earth photos from the 60s are also cgi #woke
[automerge]1623785140[/automerge]
"The outcome of the experiment was that the angular velocity of the Earth as measured by astronomy was confirmed to within measuring accuracy. "
[automerge]1623785274[/automerge]
like with the michelson morley one, this is about aether, not about the general rotation of the earth.
another interesting experiment you might want to take a look at: Cavendish experiment
nasa is not relevant to our shape of the earth. ancient greeks managed to conclude the earth being a globe and even calculated the circumference and got really close to the actual number.
thats the way to go if you are a reality denying conspiracy nutjob
[automerge]1623784860[/automerge]
satellites are fake, obviously. Its all cgi. Earth photos from the 60s are also cgi #woke
[automerge]1623785140[/automerge]
"The outcome of the experiment was that the angular velocity of the Earth as measured by astronomy was confirmed to within measuring accuracy. "
[automerge]1623785274[/automerge]
like with the michelson morley one, this is about aether, not about the general rotation of the earth.
One in the direction of earth's travel and one at right angles then comparing them for differences, they expected to measure a speed of about 30km/second, however to their amazement there was no movement of this order, for that reason they called it a null result.
It turns out they actually measured a speed of about 10km/second but they still called it a null result.
Later came the fitzgerald lorentz contraction which basically said the tube in line with the direction of movement shortens as it moves through the aether.
There were no evidence for this whatsoever, it was only a way of getting over the implication that the earth was stationary.
[automerge]1623786471[/automerge]
Did you pull that from wikipedia?
So, again, you think youβre not the one spreading misinformation on this forumβ¦do you have any people offline who respect you enough to say youβre completely off base, or do you just get your beliefs from unverifiable YouTubers with no oversight or sense of ethical responsibility? Donβt answer if you donβt want, I know which one it is.
You believe that the earth is flat?
refer to primary source materials by people who mathematically proved that the earth is round...
[automerge]1623787757[/automerge]
i mean there was a famous Mathematician in pakistan that calculated earth's diameter as well from Gilgit(a place in pakistan) i believe
refer to primary source materials by people who mathematically proved that the earth is round...
[automerge]1623787757[/automerge]
i mean there was a famous Mathematician in pakistan that calculated earth's diameter as well from Gilgit(a place in pakistan) i believe
We might as well not bother, this dude has an incredibly warped opinion on damn near everythingβ¦he sure isnβt gonna change my mind, nor I his, so Iβm gonna bounce.
99 percent of all the scientists who have studied this topic for years say your opinion is wrong, so Iβm gonna go with the experts over you. If you canβt understand that, wouldnβt be the first time you rejected an easily comprehensible idea.
99 percent of all the scientists who have studied this topic for years say your opinion is wrong, so Iβm gonna go with the experts over you. If you canβt understand that, wouldnβt be the first time you rejected an easily comprehensible idea.
The mere consideration of taking wack theories that were debunked centuries ago, and spreading some wack experiments which also were debunked, without any consideration for how researches are conducted in any kind of field, is, by itself, spreading misinformation.
You're fuelling a debate that should have never even resurfaced in the first place.
You're fuelling a debate that should have never even resurfaced in the first place.
who's asking you to believe nasa.. but that doesn't mean you choose an opinion thats to the contrary rather than broadening this tunneled view..
you have the moon phase fact that proves the roundness of earth
the time-space fabric theory
if earth was some weird spaghetti in midst of space.. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A VISUAL FLUCTUATION IN GRAVITY.. AND GRAVITY CONSTANTS WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A THING... since if one was near the core of the "spaghetti" would experience excess gravitational pull compared to someone sitting on that meat ball on this spaghetti.
since gravity is approximately constant everywhere on earth.. (i say that coz earth is not a perfect sphere so its an approximate) then the surface should be somewhat uniform...and a sphere has a uniform surface throughout but a ragged circle is not entirely uniform but approximates can be derived to make constants..
a flat earther cannot explain gravity at all for that fact and you can't argue the same for a flat module of earth.. coz the gravity at the end of the disk would vary from the center... hence proving variations in constants.
you have the moon phase fact that proves the roundness of earth
the time-space fabric theory
if earth was some weird spaghetti in midst of space.. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A VISUAL FLUCTUATION IN GRAVITY.. AND GRAVITY CONSTANTS WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A THING... since if one was near the core of the "spaghetti" would experience excess gravitational pull compared to someone sitting on that meat ball on this spaghetti.
since gravity is approximately constant everywhere on earth.. (i say that coz earth is not a perfect sphere so its an approximate) then the surface should be somewhat uniform...and a sphere has a uniform surface throughout but a ragged circle is not entirely uniform but approximates can be derived to make constants..
a flat earther cannot explain gravity at all for that fact and you can't argue the same for a flat module of earth.. coz the gravity at the end of the disk would vary from the center... hence proving variations in constants.
yes, cause fucking aether doesnt exist! that was the point of that experiment! they tried to detect aether! seriously, look up these experiments yourself before listing them as examples for something they simply are not. this is 10/10 scientific illiteracy
No. aether just doesnt exist. The earth is not stationary, even flattards with ring-laser gyroscopes proved that there is a 15Β° per hour drift (netflix documentary, bob knodel).
you simply do not get what the experiments you are listing are even about lmfao. imagine having the nerve to post a list of these, telling others to look them up, while not getting them at all yourself.
[automerge]1623844918[/automerge]
yes, still better than listening to the summary of a flattards on youtube, which is what you must have done to reach these conclusions lmfao.
[automerge]1623844965[/automerge]
and i did look them up, and they were not what you are claiming they are. tehy were all about aether, which doesnt freaking exist genius.
[automerge]1623845070[/automerge]
it cant be flat, sunrise/set and eclipses are literally impossible on a flat earth and no single flattard ever came close to explaining how these would work on a flat earth, cause it just doesnt. get over it
[automerge]1623845140[/automerge]
lmfao most flattards from what i know even think the moon itself is a light scource instead of reflecting light. xD
[automerge]1623845189[/automerge]
inb4 he doesnt think gravity is a thing (i mentioned cavendish experiment because i was assuming this anyway)
[automerge]1623845454[/automerge]
these scientists are not even saying what he claims they are. these experiments were not about the earths rotation, they were about the aether, which doesnt exist.
[automerge]1623845598[/automerge]
anyway, you should watch some of these videos @Yubel . No nasa, just amateur footage (and calculations in one video)
[automerge]1623848757[/automerge]
For anyone else that wants to have some good laughs:
No. aether just doesnt exist. The earth is not stationary, even flattards with ring-laser gyroscopes proved that there is a 15Β° per hour drift (netflix documentary, bob knodel).
you simply do not get what the experiments you are listing are even about lmfao. imagine having the nerve to post a list of these, telling others to look them up, while not getting them at all yourself.
[automerge]1623844918[/automerge]
yes, still better than listening to the summary of a flattards on youtube, which is what you must have done to reach these conclusions lmfao.
[automerge]1623844965[/automerge]
and i did look them up, and they were not what you are claiming they are. tehy were all about aether, which doesnt freaking exist genius.
[automerge]1623845070[/automerge]
it cant be flat, sunrise/set and eclipses are literally impossible on a flat earth and no single flattard ever came close to explaining how these would work on a flat earth, cause it just doesnt. get over it
[automerge]1623845140[/automerge]
lmfao most flattards from what i know even think the moon itself is a light scource instead of reflecting light. xD
[automerge]1623845189[/automerge]
inb4 he doesnt think gravity is a thing (i mentioned cavendish experiment because i was assuming this anyway)
[automerge]1623845454[/automerge]
these scientists are not even saying what he claims they are. these experiments were not about the earths rotation, they were about the aether, which doesnt exist.
[automerge]1623845598[/automerge]
anyway, you should watch some of these videos @Yubel . No nasa, just amateur footage (and calculations in one video)
For anyone else that wants to have some good laughs:
Last edited:
