It is okay for Dragon/Revos to fail dude. Dragon and Revos going to save Ginney doesn't mean the Holy Knights or Gorosei should look bad. Why is that so hard for you to understand? A writer can make two opposite factions look good. Talented authors don't need to sacrifice one faction in order to make another faction look good. Oda isn't talented so he has no way of making both side look good so he always needs a character or faction to be used as a hype tool for the other character/faction.
There is dozens of different scenarios as to how it could have all played out. All of them have logical reasons as to why or why not it happened in that specific way.
Your sense of entitlement that your way is the right way, and all other thought processes are wrong, is what is the problem with the way you approach all your threads and arguments.
Could Oda have written the Revo's saving Ginny in a manner that makes sense? Yes. Is it also logical the way it was written as to why the Revo's didn't save Ginny? Also yes.
Both scenarios are logical, but your entitled ass wants to argue that your way is the correct way, and all other arguments is just "dick writing Oda agenda."
In this scenario, the Revolutionaries not attacking Mariejois is 100 percent the correct decision. But you don't care about what is or isn't the correct decision. You only care that "this is fiction, and it can happen, and if it doesn't happen they way YOU want it to" then it is shit writing. You don't debate the points brought against you. You just attack and bash people's perspectives, and ignore everything else.
And I love how you say Oda is a talentless author and can't do this, when he's literally done what your saying he is incapable of doing many times before. You even brought up examples of it, Lmfao.