Eos zoro vs nappa
- Thread starter Albino 👑
- Start date
- Status
You didn't debunk shit; you cannot debunk feats which already happened.
Try to debunk that Piccolo destroying the moon isn't actually a moon lv feat and try to prove that this was a clear outlier. Don't talk, prove.
I obviously talked about Teen Piccolo; not that King Piccolo matters here.
???
Piccolo destroyed it, lol.
Once again: "Will", "could", "would have" - these things, purely based on speculations, do not matter at all in a crossover battle.
Otherwise I can claim as well that Naruto god tiers will reach universe/multiversal lv at the end, FT characters will destroy entire solar systems, MHA characters having their own multiverse at the end and so on.
Bring facts, not speculations.
It is a mismatch, get over it.
Try to debunk that Piccolo destroying the moon isn't actually a moon lv feat and try to prove that this was a clear outlier. Don't talk, prove.
I obviously talked about Teen Piccolo; not that King Piccolo matters here.
???
Piccolo destroyed it, lol.
Once again: "Will", "could", "would have" - these things, purely based on speculations, do not matter at all in a crossover battle.
Otherwise I can claim as well that Naruto god tiers will reach universe/multiversal lv at the end, FT characters will destroy entire solar systems, MHA characters having their own multiverse at the end and so on.
Bring facts, not speculations.
It is a mismatch, get over it.
What do u mean:"Will", "could", "would have" - these things, purely based on speculations, do not matter at all in a crossover battle.
I didn't create the thread. The thread says EoS Zoro, I don't have EoS Zoro feats so I judge just based on speculation. Otherwise the mods should close the thread.
Till that moment comes I will use: "Will", "could", "would have".
I didn't create the thread. The thread says EoS Zoro, I don't have EoS Zoro feats so I judge just based on speculation. Otherwise the mods should close the thread.
Till that moment comes I will use: "Will", "could", "would have".
Your arguments were based on their previous performance when they were massively weaker than before.
I've already told you how much of big steps their powerlevels make in DB. But I'll repeat that again: Are you going to question as well that DBS Goku can destroy the universe now whereas he was at best galaxy lv before?
We're talking about steps from star lv, solar system lv and galaxy lv in 3 different sagas.
Piccolo grew stronger, his training made him extremely powerful; e. g. he struggled extremely hard to keep up with Radditz whereas Piccolo later one shot a Saibaman which was as strong as Radditz.
IIRC, when Teen Piccolo was about to lose the fight against Goku on the tournament, he wiped out the country.
I've already told you how much of big steps their powerlevels make in DB. But I'll repeat that again: Are you going to question as well that DBS Goku can destroy the universe now whereas he was at best galaxy lv before?
We're talking about steps from star lv, solar system lv and galaxy lv in 3 different sagas.
Piccolo grew stronger, his training made him extremely powerful; e. g. he struggled extremely hard to keep up with Radditz whereas Piccolo later one shot a Saibaman which was as strong as Radditz.
IIRC, when Teen Piccolo was about to lose the fight against Goku on the tournament, he wiped out the country.
Homie, based on ur own logic, ur input is also crappy. Cause from what we know EoS Zoro might be able to send air slashes form East Blue to West Blue.
Can't u see how dumb u are when u say" we don't know shit about EoS Zero thus let's not talk about him" & then u followup with Nappa vs EoS Zoro is a mismatch.
Can't u see how dumb u are when u say" we don't know shit about EoS Zero thus let's not talk about him" & then u followup with Nappa vs EoS Zoro is a mismatch.
No, it is a logical conclusion how to deal with facts.
You are not going to solve any crossover battles with your logic, everyone could come up with some speculation stuff to support their headcanon. Thus, we should stick to pure facts.
No, this is not the case, unless you can prove this.
Which OP character has shown this feat?
I'm not dumb when I say the obvious outcome; we can't compare EOS Luffy to Nappa either; he's featless. Thus, I use at least the best current feats but I'm afraid this is not enough at all to deal with a character like Nappa.
You are not going to solve any crossover battles with your logic, everyone could come up with some speculation stuff to support their headcanon. Thus, we should stick to pure facts.
No, this is not the case, unless you can prove this.
Which OP character has shown this feat?
I'm not dumb when I say the obvious outcome; we can't compare EOS Luffy to Nappa either; he's featless. Thus, I use at least the best current feats but I'm afraid this is not enough at all to deal with a character like Nappa.
You said, EOS Zoro extreme diffs Nappa cuz of lethality; and your statement was proven wrong; you cannot have more lethality than a moon buster, unless you have hax.
And I didn't think anyone would take this thread seriously and actually argues in favour of EOS Zoro, lol.
Yes, Zoro is a mountain buster and yes, I think EOS OP characters will reach continent/multi continent lv or even above but that's just my own headcanon. I cannot use that in crossover battles - other users on other forums would easily destroy my headcanon. That was my point.
And I didn't think anyone would take this thread seriously and actually argues in favour of EOS Zoro, lol.
Post automatically merged:
Yes, Zoro is a mountain buster and yes, I think EOS OP characters will reach continent/multi continent lv or even above but that's just my own headcanon. I cannot use that in crossover battles - other users on other forums would easily destroy my headcanon. That was my point.
Zoro-Brainers. They think he can even take on God himself and still win. They think by headcannons, not logic XD.
Saitama can take on majority of DB characters especially ut was confirm him easily killing Boros who was only Star lvl of power and still hold back and wasn't even serious still.
Post automatically merged:
Saitama can take on majority of DB characters especially ut was confirm him easily killing Boros who was only Star lvl of power and still hold back and wasn't even serious still.
Tbh, Dragonball is at some points inconsistence as fuck, so every fight could be debatable.
One problem with Nappa is his charakter. He underrated his enemies, that´s why Krillin nearly killed him with his destruction disc. Fodder like Yajirobe could cut Vegeta his tail of, when he was off guard. I think Zoro can hurt Nappa, since Zoro should be scale far above Yajirobe, but i didn´t see any chance for him if Nappa rampaged with his fingers, or his Mortal Kombat style. Zoro dies the second, if Nappa gets pissed off. We should let him fight against weaker and slower DB charakters first, then we could say if Zoro wins or not.
If Zoro is bloodlusted and Nappa in charakter, he could win. If both are bloodlusted then Nappa stomps hard. If both are in charakter, then Zoro attacks him, Nappa dogdes probably to late and get hurt by Zoro. That is the moment that Nappa is pissed and blinks Zoro horrible.
One problem with Nappa is his charakter. He underrated his enemies, that´s why Krillin nearly killed him with his destruction disc. Fodder like Yajirobe could cut Vegeta his tail of, when he was off guard. I think Zoro can hurt Nappa, since Zoro should be scale far above Yajirobe, but i didn´t see any chance for him if Nappa rampaged with his fingers, or his Mortal Kombat style. Zoro dies the second, if Nappa gets pissed off. We should let him fight against weaker and slower DB charakters first, then we could say if Zoro wins or not.
If Zoro is bloodlusted and Nappa in charakter, he could win. If both are bloodlusted then Nappa stomps hard. If both are in charakter, then Zoro attacks him, Nappa dogdes probably to late and get hurt by Zoro. That is the moment that Nappa is pissed and blinks Zoro horrible.
- Status