If you have a man in a wheelchair right
his physical capacity to move and act is limited as he cant even move his legs
That is not equal as there are people who have the ability to move their legs, Should we cleave off people's limbs to make the capable equal to the non capable
Even the whole idea of wealth is based on accumulative conditions from your parents, Do you have a rich father who you can inherit money from no then your poor and unable to climb up the ladder. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that we killed the rich just their dead right
What's to stop the alive misfortunate ones from slowly over a period of time also gaining that same generational wealth afterall even among the poor there are differences in class levels like you have those who are homeless with no wealth whatsoever and maybe some below average guy who lives with his parents and cant so much as find a job
I mean there are differences in status even among just those two people
even if we look at situations which might not entirely be based on wealth like iq or physical power, There are advantages some more muscled man may have over me given his strength maybe because of that built he has he can get more jobs same idea goes with intelligence yknow there may be chances to con or manipulate others for personal gain which might be able to be done by someone who's more dumb as they lack the required knowledge of appealing to the natural desire of people
To make equal all these factors for the sake of fairless, you would have cleave off limbs and make everyone dumb
And even then so if you do that then someone would have be in a position to make that executive choice meaning he/she would be superior
Equality to some level is fine as if there's no fairness whatsoever then tyranny occurs
but you alot of the times get people who are so brought into the concept that punishing the idea of dating preferences itself becomes an actual argument and sure it's not equal but if you force them to date then your also superior cause you have the position of power over them to make choices on their behalf
To sum it up, It's not a concrete idea but there needs to be some level of it for a society to function but the problem being alot of egalitarians take it too far imposing people should not be able to speak as it's hateful or violates some standard of equality, it's a nigh religious devotion to the idea at the cost of realism and common sense. that is my problem here
his physical capacity to move and act is limited as he cant even move his legs
That is not equal as there are people who have the ability to move their legs, Should we cleave off people's limbs to make the capable equal to the non capable
Even the whole idea of wealth is based on accumulative conditions from your parents, Do you have a rich father who you can inherit money from no then your poor and unable to climb up the ladder. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that we killed the rich just their dead right
What's to stop the alive misfortunate ones from slowly over a period of time also gaining that same generational wealth afterall even among the poor there are differences in class levels like you have those who are homeless with no wealth whatsoever and maybe some below average guy who lives with his parents and cant so much as find a job
I mean there are differences in status even among just those two people
even if we look at situations which might not entirely be based on wealth like iq or physical power, There are advantages some more muscled man may have over me given his strength maybe because of that built he has he can get more jobs same idea goes with intelligence yknow there may be chances to con or manipulate others for personal gain which might be able to be done by someone who's more dumb as they lack the required knowledge of appealing to the natural desire of people
To make equal all these factors for the sake of fairless, you would have cleave off limbs and make everyone dumb
And even then so if you do that then someone would have be in a position to make that executive choice meaning he/she would be superior
Equality to some level is fine as if there's no fairness whatsoever then tyranny occurs
but you alot of the times get people who are so brought into the concept that punishing the idea of dating preferences itself becomes an actual argument and sure it's not equal but if you force them to date then your also superior cause you have the position of power over them to make choices on their behalf
To sum it up, It's not a concrete idea but there needs to be some level of it for a society to function but the problem being alot of egalitarians take it too far imposing people should not be able to speak as it's hateful or violates some standard of equality, it's a nigh religious devotion to the idea at the cost of realism and common sense. that is my problem here
