General Chat

my post is still online... means all your literature is BS
Or that it won't help anybody to delete it at this point, or that the staff can't assure 100% that you spoiled us even though everything points to it. You better shut up because mods already confirmed you added the Nika part after spoilers came out, and even if you were unlucky enough to do it without reading the spoilers (just an unfortunate coincidence many days after publishing your original theory and just half an hour after spoilers were released) it's still the fact that you answered us all while obviously knowing about what was happening in the incoming chapter.

But let's make this clear once for all: sorry to bother you again, @Natalija , but why is this post still open and this user still unpunished after confirming that he edited his post to mention Nika once spoilers were released (no mention of it before that) and he shared responses mentioning the Nika model of the Hito Hito while saying that another user "almost got it" and taunting me by claiming my presence as if he indeed knew the outcome of his "theory" and wanted to rejoice?
 
Or that it won't help anybody to delete it at this point, or that the staff can't assure 100% that you spoiled us even though everything points to it. You better shut up because mods already confirmed you added the Nika part after spoilers came out, and even if you were unlucky enough to do it without reading the spoilers (just an unfortunate coincidence many days after publishing your original theory and just half an hour after spoilers were released) it's still the fact that you answered us all while obviously knowing about what was happening in the incoming chapter.

But let's make this clear once for all: sorry to bother you again, @Natalija , but why is this post still open and this user still unpunished after confirming that he edited his post to mention Nika once spoilers were released (no mention of it before that) and he shared responses mentioning the Nika model of the Hito Hito while saying that another user "almost got it" and taunting me by claiming my presence as if he indeed knew the outcome of his "theory"?
Eh it's because he got away with it, he wasn't reported before and we don't really do retroactive punishing for spoilers, just for insults. (Though I returned his original post)
 
Eh it's because he got away with it, he wasn't reported before and we don't really do retroactive punishing for spoilers, just for insults.
Thank you very much.

So there you go, @Chamm_Timewalker: you just were lucky nobody cared about your theory enough to report your spoilers before the chapter was out and I checked it. Nobody buys your excuses and the mods are perfectly aware you edited your post exactly when spoilers were released and spoiled everybody by pretending you guessed Luffy's fruit right (even though your theory didn't mention Nika at first as your thread currently shows; mods didn't restore your original title, but I know it didn't mention Nika either, so don't try to pretend like it did); they just won't punish retroactively for it.

Don't play with your luck next time because you're too bad of a liar to get away with it again; my personal tip.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much.

So there you go, @Chamm_Timewalker: you just were lucky nobody cared about your theory enough to report your spoilers before the chapter was out and I checked it. Nobody buys your excuses and the mods are perfectly aware you edited your post exactly when spoilers were released and spoiled everybody by pretending you guessed Luffy's fruit right, but they just won't punish retroactively for it.

Don't play with your luck next time because you may not get away with it again, my personal tip.
Report them next time, because then it's a ban :sadgrin:
 
To summarize:

-A user publishes on friday 18 a theory on Luffy having a generic "god god" fruit with no proper argument given.

-Right after spoilers for chapter 1044 are released in tuesday 22 he goes and edits said thread in order to add explicit mentions of Nika to make it look like his theory was about Luffy having the Nika model of the Hito Hito all along.

-He then begins to quote the people who commented on his thread in a spoily way; remember this all happens way before the chapter itself is released so it couldn't be discussed out of the spoiler thread.

-I report him on friday after chapter was released because I was avoiding spoilers and I suspect he edited his theory to make it look like he guessed Luffy's Nika fruit from the start. Mods confirm that he indeed edited everything and no mention of Nika was to be seen originally.

-The user, who is a terrible liar, rejoices in the fact that his thread remains open to deny my accusation and label me a hater. It's eventually proven that moderators are perfectly aware he's playing fool and indeed disguised spoilers as theory but since they won't punish retroactively they will let it be.

And that's pretty much it. So if either you or anybody else see @Chamm_Timewalker sharing spoilers disguised as theories, please make sure to report him so he'll be banned!
 

Finalbeta

Zoro Worshipper
To summarize:

-A user publishes on friday 18 a theory on Luffy having a generic "god god" fruit with no proper argument given.

-Right after spoilers for chapter 1044 are released in tuesday 22 he goes and edits said thread in order to add explicit mentions of Nika to make it look like his theory was about Luffy having the Nika model of the Hito Hito all along.

-He then begins to quote the people who commented on his thread in a spoily way; remember this all happens way before the chapter itself is released so it couldn't be discussed out of the spoiler thread.

-I report him on friday after chapter was released because I was avoiding spoilers and I suspect he edited his theory to make it look like he guessed Luffy's Nika fruit from the start. Mods confirm that he indeed edited everything and no mention of Nika was to be seen originally.

-The user, who is a terrible liar, rejoices in the fact that his thread remains open to deny my accusation and label me a hater. It's eventually proven that moderators are perfectly aware he's playing fool and indeed disguised spoilers as theory but since they won't punish retroactively they will let it be.

And that's pretty much it. So if either you or anybody else see @Chamm_Timewalker sharing spoilers disguised as theories, please make sure to report him so he'll be banned!
I miss the ancient times bans like this were addressed and not ignored. :josad:

These days even throwing 5 insulting slurs at someone in the same post won't get someone banned immediately.
 
To summarize:

-A user publishes on friday 18 a theory on Luffy having a generic "god god" fruit with no proper argument given.

-Right after spoilers for chapter 1044 are released in tuesday 22 he goes and edits said thread in order to add explicit mentions of Nika to make it look like his theory was about Luffy having the Nika model of the Hito Hito all along.

-He then begins to quote the people who commented on his thread in a spoily way; remember this all happens way before the chapter itself is released so it couldn't be discussed out of the spoiler thread.

-I report him on friday after chapter was released because I was avoiding spoilers and I suspect he edited his theory to make it look like he guessed Luffy's Nika fruit from the start. Mods confirm that he indeed edited everything and no mention of Nika was to be seen originally.

-The user, who is a terrible liar, rejoices in the fact that his thread remains open to deny my accusation and label me a hater. It's eventually proven that moderators are perfectly aware he's playing fool and indeed disguised spoilers as theory but since they won't punish retroactively they will let it be.

And that's pretty much it. So if either you or anybody else see @Chamm_Timewalker sharing spoilers disguised as theories, please make sure to report him so he'll be banned!
hi hater
Post automatically merged:

To summarize:

-A user publishes on friday 18 a theory on Luffy having a generic "god god" fruit with no proper argument given.

-Right after spoilers for chapter 1044 are released in tuesday 22 he goes and edits said thread in order to add explicit mentions of Nika to make it look like his theory was about Luffy having the Nika model of the Hito Hito all along.

-He then begins to quote the people who commented on his thread in a spoily way; remember this all happens way before the chapter itself is released so it couldn't be discussed out of the spoiler thread.

-I report him on friday after chapter was released because I was avoiding spoilers and I suspect he edited his theory to make it look like he guessed Luffy's Nika fruit from the start. Mods confirm that he indeed edited everything and no mention of Nika was to be seen originally.

-The user, who is a terrible liar, rejoices in the fact that his thread remains open to deny my accusation and label me a hater. It's eventually proven that moderators are perfectly aware he's playing fool and indeed disguised spoilers as theory but since they won't punish retroactively they will let it be.

And that's pretty much it. So if either you or anybody else see @Chamm_Timewalker sharing spoilers disguised as theories, please make sure to report him so he'll be banned!
please take a snap shot of active theories by @Chamm_Timewalker for future reference
Post automatically merged:

Or that it won't help anybody to delete it at this point, or that the staff can't assure 100% that you spoiled us even though everything points to it. You better shut up because mods already confirmed you added the Nika part after spoilers came out, and even if you were unlucky enough to do it without reading the spoilers (just an unfortunate coincidence many days after publishing your original theory and just half an hour after spoilers were released) it's still the fact that you answered us all while obviously knowing about what was happening in the incoming chapter.

But let's make this clear once for all: sorry to bother you again, @Natalija , but why is this post still open and this user still unpunished after confirming that he edited his post to mention Nika once spoilers were released (no mention of it before that) and he shared responses mentioning the Nika model of the Hito Hito while saying that another user "almost got it" and taunting me by claiming my presence as if he indeed knew the outcome of his "theory" and wanted to rejoice?
LOL....LOL....LOL....LOL...please take a snap shot of active theories by @Chamm_Timewalker for future reference
 

Rottkins

✯ ✧ 𝔾 𝕠 𝕕 𝕠 𝕗 𝕃 𝕚 𝕖 𝕤 ✧ ✯
Holly God Usopp so much drama explaining I see :sanmoji: But yeah, hello. I have like, that stupid one night to make a presentable GDD WIP for the Game Dev lectures but motivation is longe gone :crybeard:
 
Top